Why Did These Black Pacific Islanders Look So Much Like Many Black Americans? 1492. - page 9

Olmecs were not black

Stop the vulturing

Neither were natives

Yall are actually dumbazzhell. This thread dumb as sh1t. Have a good life everyone BX aint for me no more

Yall are actually dumbazzhell. This thread dumb as sh1t. Have a good life everyone BX aint for me no more

African isn’t a phenotype

Lowriders came from 1950s white American greaser culture

David Jaramillo began converting a 1969 Ford LTD in the late 1970s. His lowrider, known as “Dave’s Dream,” became a community favorite in towns north of Santa Fe, New Mexico, where it won many trophies. Tragically, David was killed in an accident in a different vehicle. In 1990, curators at the Smithsonian National Museum of American History visited Chimayó, New Mexico to acquire Dave’s Dream. Between 1990 and 1992, friends, family, and club members lovingly completed the conversion work that David had begun. They also installed the hydraulic hopping mechanism that adds dance to motion, animating the car and giving it life.

Natives crossed a land bridge right? You know why Columbus came to America? Treasure


This treasure was the gran khans treasure.. el preste Juan

The noble ETHIOPIAN..


The Hindu caste is based on white and black.. the Dravidians or the untouchables are the natives of India

Columbus and his fellow crooks all noted many tribes of which there were people with curls in the extreme aka nappy to bushy afros and indeed what you see as natives


Do me a favor and find a source before 1700 that calls people black


What would you call Papuans?

I don't want your history. I just like learning about the intricacies of my home, America.

The irony is that stupid fu#k claiming we're Russian/Europeans, when he's using European racism to claim West Africans didn't have the technological advancement or Intelligence to travel to or contribute to Egypt.

Native American group from California that look like black Polynesians

[see photo]

Native American people from South America that look Polynesian

[see photo]

Natives of Virginia. Never seen any Native Americans this swole and thick

[see photo]

[see photo]

[see photo]

More Cali natives

[see photo]

[see photo]

[see photo]

The white/yellow washing of the mongol type Native American

[see photo]

I propose 366,000 Africans were brought to the United States alone. Today there are close to 40 million of their descendants in the states.

If you think I am proposing that black Americans are "the real native Americans" you're wrong.

If you think its impossible that black people from all over Asia, the Pacific Islands, Australia, and other Indian Ocean regions to have been living in America when the white man got here then you are out of your mind. Native American is not a race. It is technically a nationality that can be and obviously was applied to anyone that was living in the Americas when the Europeans first got here.

If you think that it was impossible for those of the black natives that survived genocide and foreign disease to have been usurped into the black American populations slave/gene pool then you are crazy. Especially crazy since those genetic markers show up in black American ancestry results very often and we have evidence supporting that they were here. You also have legal documents were they reclassified these people negro. Plus, you know just by taking a look at Asia that you had a black population and a mongol population that were indigenous to all of these bodies of land. Also, take into consideration that plenty of the Mexicans in Cali and Texas look like mullatos anyway. A lot of your ancestors that you think were mongol were probably some black looking Asian descended people. You can look at ancient artifacts from down there like the Bonampak Murals and can tell those people were some type of black Pacific Island or Asian people. They look nothing like 5 foot brown skin Mexicans you see at Walmart.

I don't want your history. I just like learning about the intricacies of my home, America.

Okay but Africa has many phenotypes and some are present in some Pacific Islanders. Semantics.

Semantics aren’t scientific

They are present for a reason.. stop trying to marginalize dark skinned people


You are only providing the point here tho. The term black has bothering to do with trying to make what appears “African “ from Africa


Asians have “African “ phenotype in such case so does everyone..

Those are not Virginia indians

That first painting is brazil indians
Second is Cuban indians marriage

I read that book

Thank you for that fact. In 1700, there were roughly 260,000 European colonists. Today, there are over 265,000,000 European Americans.

Do you have a genetic study affirming your belief in two separate Native populations?

Do you have a genetic study arguing for multiple populations from across Asia and the Pacific populating the Americas in ancient history?

For example, there may have been who did come in the very distant past. But the population was absorbed and only left a faint genetic trace, or, it could be a genetic signature of the specific Siberian population that came to the Americas.

What makes a dark-skinned mongol not black?

Lol, that's because European immigration to America has been happening nonstop since 1700, while 366,000 is the total and final number of Africans brought to the US to be enslaved.

I'm sure I could pull up receipts for everything you inquired, but I have to be honest. I really don't care that much about this subject to get that deep.

Yes, they have found Polynesian DNA in some natives.

Yes, the Bering Straight Theory is a theory, not a fact, and you can easily find articles, some even written by native mongols providing evidence that Polynesians were in the Americas before white people.

There were more than two separate native populations. There were many. As I've already stated, all mongol natives didn't even look alike.

Not looking like a black person makes a dark skinned mongol not black.

Sounds like stating numbers without context is deceiving

To summarize, you go by looks and non-scientific written sources to determine ethnic/racial differences in ancient people. I can't tell you how to use your time, but the time you spent replying to people in this thread could have been used to actually learn this history of the Americas. At the moment, you're just skimming the surface historically, and scientifically, you're speaking a different language. You're applying some weird pan-African model of white supremacy to classify ancient peoples.

The first one is definitely the Oholne tribe of California.

You have no point on the second one. They are still black Polynesians that were indigenous to modern day Latin America.

Third, those are Virginian natives. They have on the typical attire for natives along the Atlantic coast during that time period.

You're welcome to post your sources.

The only source for the first picture is lipstick alley/pintrest and some random blogs, LMAO

The only source for the first picture is lipstick alley/pintrest and some random blogs, LMAO

The first one is definitely the Oholne tribe of California.

You have no point on the second one. They are still black Polynesians that were indigenous to modern day Latin America.

Third, those are Virginian natives. They have on the typical attire for natives along the Atlantic coast during that time period.

You're welcome to post your sources.