Why Did These Black Pacific Islanders Look So Much Like Many Black Americans? 1492. - page 8

Yeah because those are the ones that have actually been properly preserved and not extensively tampered with, genius

Who?

Oh wait you mean the debunked psuedohistorian

(WARNING: Viciously brutal L incoming)

[see photo]

[see photo]

[see photo]

[see photo]

Miss me with this dusty hotep projection

I provided peer-reviewed research data from one of the most prominent scientific journals in the world.

You cited a fraud.

Again, more raging projection because I destroyed your fantasy

Look at you fantasizing about white men raping women while you speak your oppressor's language, pay taxes to your oppressor, never visited your ancestral homelands, had your culture utterly extinguished AND hate your own identity so much you have to claim other cultures as your own

It was our world until the conquers who were all white started committing genocide amongst all our people scattered across Earth. They r@ped and had s3x with all the women causing them to have lighter offspring until the majority of the population was light or took on different mixed features. Like the Indians of Americas, the islanders we mostly see today Mexicans or even the modern Asian. Look at the black people of America today interracial mixing has changed us completely. Now a huge number of our people look like the Ball boys. They were only less than 10% off the works population but yet they were able to take over the world and change our nature

You're a spainard lol.

You're always talking sh1t but you in here using mental gymnastics on why they only test mummies from a a later period. After the Greeks conquered Eygpt.

The tombs of ancient Egypt have yielded golden collars and ivory bracelets, but another treasure — human DNA — has proved elusive. Now, scientists have captured sweeping genomic information from Egyptian mummies. It reveals that mummies were closely related to ancient Middle Easterners, hinting that northern Africans might have different genetic roots from people south of the Sahara desert.

The study, published on 30 May in Nature Communications1, includes data from 90 mummies buried between 1380 bc, during Egypt’s New Kingdom, and ad 425, in the Roman era. The findings show that the mummies’ closest kin were ancient farmers from a region that includes present-day Israel and Jordan. Modern Egyptians, by contrast, have inherited more of their DNA from central Africans.

Then you want to use genetics as if genotype determines phenotype, which we kno isn't the case.

The term "phenotype" refers to the observable physical properties of an organism; these include the organism's appearance, development, and behavior. An organism's phenotype is determined by its genotype, which is the set of genes the organism carries, as well as by environmental influences upon these genes. Due to the influence of environmental factors, organisms with identical genotypes, such as identical twins, ultimately express nonidentical phenotypes because each organism encounters unique environmental influences as it develops. Examples of phenotypes include height, wing length, and hair color. Phenotypes also include observable characteristics that can be measured in the laboratory, such as levels of hormones or blood cells.

You can go on and on being mad about because we're the best athletes and we look similar to Egyptians and we conquered Iberia.

And we went through slavery with out all our people being mingled into a completely different race.

The dumb a$s theory you people have that the ancestors of West African people lived in west Africa for hundreds of thousands of years and didn't migrate didn't build sea faring vessels had no language is racist and only show how weak and insecure you are.

You can't call people Russians and then rely on racist theories that suggest all black people were primitive and the Sahara was to much of a obstacles for the west African to expand.

What's your method for discerning reliability?

So far based on our past interactions, it seems like anything that supports your conclusions is reliable and anything to the counter is doctored, without technical or scientific explanations.

All those words just to say I'm right

So to summarize, you have no claim, you're just wondering out loud? This is an overglorified diary post?

is Canadian....

Whites have absolutely no incentive to lie about there being blacks that were indigenous to the Americas.

You're a spainard lol.

You're always talking sh1t but you in here using mental gymnastics on why they only test mummies from a a later period. After the Greeks conquered Eygpt.


Then you want to use genetics as if genotype determines phenotype, which we kno isn't the case.

You can go on and on being mad about because we're the best athletes and we look similar to Egyptians and we conquered Iberia. And we went through slavery with out all our people being mingled into a completely different race.

The dumb a$s theory you people have that the ancestors of West African people lived in west Africa for hundreds of thousands of years and didn't migrate didn't build sea faring vessels had no language is racist and only show how weak and insecure you are.

You can't call people Russians and then rely on racist theories that suggest all black people were primitive and the Sahara was to much of a obstacles for the west African to expand.

Yo, that sh1t right there in the bold is crazy fu#king irony.

This racist dirt eating, wanna be native confused a$s white boy is the worst poster I've ever come across on any message board. Automatic slap status.

Ask Ronnie would he have a website if it didn't focus on black American culture, news, and current events.

No one is here to discuss your culture, whatever that is. If this site was based around your ethnicity it wouldn't be in business.

This is an African American message board and it doesn't matter how you have to lie to yourself about it to make yourselves feel better. If this wasn't an African American message board you wouldn't want to post here.

Actually you do

Your pathetic little scheme is not going to work, Dmitry

By pretending to be Black and trying to steal the heritage and cultural identity of Indigenous Native Americans --whom Hispanic actually descend from-- you can then claim this land "belongs" to Black people, when it really doesn't.

This land belongs to Hispanics and Native Americans because they were here first before anybody and everyone else is guests

Why on earth would a black American who comes from one of the most influential and imapctful ethnic groups to ever exist want or need to steal the heritage and cultural identity of a shirtless group of people like native mongols and polynesians?

My people have contributed nothing to society, no music, no films, no literature, no inventions, no cultural relevance.

You cannibals have no modern culture.

Why on earth would I trade my glorious black American culture in for the absolute nothing that you dirt diggers have. You're on a black American message board. This isn't Brown pride. Latinos have no culture.

Post a receipt of me claiming this was black peoples land.

The land belongs to natives but not no dirt eating hispanic like you. Your ancestry and heritage is in Spain, white boy. I find it hilarious you call me Russian but I gurantee you look like a whole white boy and I'm a whole black man.

Yo, that sh1t right there in the bold is crazy fu#king irony.

This racist dirt eating, wanna be native confused a$s white boy is the worst poster I've ever come across on any message board. Automatic slap status.

History fail.



The Greeks conquered Egypt in 330 BC

The DNA tested was from...




and I quote....

WARNING: another viciously brutal L incoming



Can you count?



That's literally over a thousand years before Greece conquered Egypt

AHT! AHT!

It's not me who wants to use genetics that's way, it's SCIENCE

And on the contrary we do "kno" that IS the case

WARNING: ANOTHER viciously brutal L incoming







So not only do you not "kno" Egyptian history but you don't understand basic biology either

1) You never conquered sh1t

2) The Moors weren't Black either

The difference is Hispanics are not oppressed by Spain, genius

That sh1t happened hundreds of years ago. n1ggas moved on from that and done adapted already. Hispanics have fully absorbed and embraced Spanish/Latin culture.

There's over half a BILLION *MORE* Christian practicing, Spanish speaking Hispanics in the Americas than in Spain.

You're being fu#ked up the a$s LONG. d1ck. STYLE. by your oppressor TODAY

You're a guest in this country, Hispanics are already home

No wonder you're so jealous and desperate to try and claim civilizations that aren't your own

So where are those "sea faring vessels" now? Wakanda?

Where is the historical evidence? The archaeological proof? The receipts? Anything?

Oh right they don't exist anywhere except in your fantasies

Nobody said sh1t about "all black people were primitive" you projected that all on your own.

Black Americans have never copied anything from Hispanics and Polynesians. Can't say the same in reverse.

Lmao but the middle easterners were dark-skinned.

You're talking about haplogroup E when you speak of middle Easterners.

The middle east was black. Go to the Google and search the sussain guard.

Whites have absolutely no incentive to lie about there being blacks that were indigenous to the Americas.

Whites have every incentive in the world to lie and say there were no blacks in the Americas(even though blacks were everywhere) before whites discovered it. Because in their mind they'll view it as blacks "discovering" it before them. The Americas seemed to be way more of a prize to Whites than the "discovery" of any other land.


You don't know sh1t about black American people, especially not black American southerners. You don't know what the hell we look like.

Right about what? You're wrong because there is a black American that looks like every person I posted. This thread was never about the ones that don't. Straw manning and goal post moving. I'm not one of these idiots that post pics of some Danny Trejo lookin cat and says see they black like us.

If you're some type of latino you are worrying about the wrong blacks anyway. You need to be worried about all them black folks in Latin America that you always try to hide. Those people are the real Olmecs. A lot of you muthafu#kas down there think you're native Americans but yall are Polynesians anyway. Yall don't look sh1t like North American mongol natives or the Siberians those people come from. Yall people ain't got enough sense to figure out your own hidden history but trying disprove someone else's.

What claim do you think I'm attempting to make? Why does this claim make you so nervous.

Why did these groups in the op that were situated so close to the Americas and show up in black American ancestry results look so much like black Americans?

That's who I'm talking about ain't no irony

(viciously brutal L incoming)


Hispanics started lowriders

[see photo]

you wouldn't know about any of this way out in russia

don't even get me started on Black owned taco trucks

or gangbanging either

gangs like White Fence have been around for decades before The Avenues/Crips or the Vice Lords as well

Well the Columbus journals have been used to support your proposition. You called them doctored in another thread for containing one detail that countered the notion of the Moors on his ship having secret navigational knowledge. It's odd they would doctor one part and leave the other parts where he mentions black people and mosques alone. It also doesn't make sense that you have all these old sources to begin with given that Europeans were supposed to scrub them. And yet, many of these sources were mass published in Europe as adventure literature. We know these explorer accounts are filled with fantastical stuff, people were trying to sell books. It's puzzling that people would use these to make scientific determinations of ethnicity, especially when you acknowledge that in modern times not all melanated populations are related.





I don't get what point you are making because this is such a shallow observation to begin with. This is a thread about people looking alike with no historical or genetic information provided. You also haven't helped clarify in your responses to me. Your rebuttal to my initial post wasn't even a rebuttal, just you re-stating your question without addressing the most common sense explanation why people thousands of miles apart would share some phenotypical features.



Isn't the simplest explanation that Africans mixed with Natives post-1619 once already here in the Americas?

It's corroborated by history and genetics. It doesn't require any additional assumptions and explains why some black Americans would resemble people who descended from ancient Asian populations, and eventually mixed with Africans.

What do you propose?

The only black americans who are of
African descent are in Coastal south Carolina,
Virginia, DC. Eastcoast


My people from present day Atlanta
Area (creek)

And Bigg Gipp he's a Georgia
Black indian. His people from GA

Not every Polynesian was this dark or had an African phenotype but a lot were. 400 years of interbreeding with white and Asians will change a lot.

You still see some that still have the same looks as before. Some you can make out certain traits or features too.

I see the shxt everyday. It's exactly what happened to all the Native Americans too.

Also the churches basically erased a lot of their history. Europeans are wild bunch of hypocrites. Trash culture.