Why Did These Black Pacific Islanders Look So Much Like Many Black Americans? 1492. - page 7

There's always a white boy that told the truth about sh1t somewhere. De Volney told the truth about ancient Egyptians.

First of all, you're a hispanic most likely from the south-west, where next to no black Americans live. You don't know a GODDAMN thing about black American people, culture, history, none of that. You've never been to the rural South in all black towns where the majority of black Americans live. I know a black American that looks like every person I posted. I'm not one of these typical dummies you argue with in these threads.

But those pictures are representative of the people I'm posting. And you watching Boyz N The Hood and rap videos on BET doesn't mean you have the knowledge to speak on what the majority of black Americans look like.

I know not every black American looks like these people, which is why the thread title clearly states SOME black Americans.

I didn't say anything about genetics. Stop putting words in my mouth.

This info is STILL incorrect. The Earth is 6000 years old.

Lots of cross-cultural fu#king going on. Just like today. People don't like to talk about it but it was happening with and without consent.

Why were there 0 black people in France, Germany, Scandinavian countries, etc?

False

nope.

post up some verified sources proving me wrong.

oh wait you can't

India: Gupta Period of India

[see photo]

[see photo]

Arabs: The Sumerians called themselves “the black headed people” and their land, in cuneiform script, was simply “the land” or “the land of the black headed people” and, in the biblical Book of Genesis, Sumer is known as Shinar.

Cheddar Man

[see photo]

Smithsonian good enough for you, f@ggot?

[see photo]

Edit: Pics loaded in the wrong order for some reason. Point stands.

For example, earlier this year, the genome sequencing of a hunter-gatherer who lived in what is now Spain helped build the case that Europe was home to blue-eyed but dark-skinned people. This man, however, lived just 7,000 years ago. The researchers write that their analysis suggests that light skin was not yet widespread and ubiquitous in Europe at the time. Earlier work done with the genes of the 83 people in the new study, supported by linguistic evidence, also shows that populations in Europe about 8,000 years ago would have been mixed and diverse.

The new study adds to this growing pile of evidence. Gibbons reports that the researchers found that Europeans probably couldn’t have digested milk until about 4,300 years ago. And the story of skin pigmentation is complex. She writes:

[T]he new data confirm that about 8500 years ago, early hunter-gatherers in Spain, Luxembourg, and Hungary also had darker skin: They lacked versions of two genes—SLC24A5 and SLC45A2—that lead to depigmentation and, therefore, pale skin in Europeans today.

But in the far north—where low light levels would favor pale skin—the team found a different picture in hunter-gatherers: Seven people from the 7700-year-old Motala archaeological site in southern Sweden had both light skin gene variants, SLC24A5 and SLC45A2. They also had a third gene, HERC2/OCA2, which causes blue eyes and may also contribute to light skin and blond hair. Thus ancient hunter-gatherers of the far north were already pale and blue-eyed, but those of central and southern Europe had darker skin.

Why were there 0 black people in France, Germany, Scandinavian countries, etc?

but not France, Germany, Wales, Belgium, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Finland, etc. tho

how can you "cover the whole planet" when it's millions and millions of square miles that went "uncovered"?

that's like hiring someone to paint your "whole house" and they only do the front door and bounce

so called black people were the 1st race on the planet so it makes sense that we our native to all lands. people think we were just in Africa smdh thats not logical

Why were there 0 black people in France, Germany, Scandinavian countries, etc?

But that is quite wrong. Numbers might not have been as high as in England, but there were almost certainly more than 1,000 Africans in late-18th-century Ireland, and, my research suggests, between 3,000 and 10,000 who were black or mixed-race in the mid-19th century. Therefore many apparently white Irish people today could have African recessive genes in their DNA, and these might be expected to appear in some individuals.

Look at this racist piece of sh1t here

I'm not culturing sh1t, you racist son of a bi#ch. You're the one that posts on a black American message board. This ain't Brown pride, boy. All I did was post some pics and ask why they look so much like black Americans.

I ain't said sh1t about no damn Olmecs but since you want some attention, here you go

I guess this big Mark Henry, Pat Ewing head n1gga got on a helmet huh?

[see photo]

[see photo]

Ireland and their Twa Pygmy ancestors lol

Leprechaun legends really stem from the original Pygmy people that settled there. “Black Irish” used as a derogatory term is no coincidence and Anglos hate for them stems from their Black ancestry.

You can duck all you want, doesn’t change facts.

Ireland and their Twa Pygmy ancestors lol

They had hood chicks back then too?!?

The one on the bottom looks like she kinda bougie and says "girl bye" a lot and call all her friends "bi#ch".

The one on top look like she mix tobacco with her weed and be scamming n1ggas to buy fake designer clothes

From your own source

Point out where in my post I ever mentioned Spain, Luxembourg or Hungary

Do they not have maps in your village, Boris?

I said...








And I quote.......










Do you russians not understand the difference between France, Germany, Scandinavian countries and Spain, Hungary and Luxembourg?

I'm not "ducking" anything, you're the one changing the subject to Ireland for some strange reason and talking about Irish people because your russian education system failed to teach you about basic geography

Oh.. and.....




another brutal L incoming




(your third straight in a row btw

)


Irish dude gets DNA test:




Timestamp - 3:39

90% Irish/Scottish/Welsh

8.8% English

1.2% Middle Eastern





Timestamp - 5:47


96.5% Irish, Scottish and Welsh and 3.5% Iberian

You are currently 0 for 3 right now, Boris

[see photo]

[see photo]

Pale faces didn’t show up until around 7k to 6k years ago in Scandinavia either. That’s almost 6k years after the Dark Skin/Black original settlers of that part of Europe. This still backs the fact that whites didn’t show up in the archaeological record until the time frame I specified, 6 to 7k years ago. Dumass……


Next…..

Edit: The linked article was written by an academic journalist from Lund University in Sweden. f@ggot….

I’m not going to explain the fallacy of those tests on BX for the 1,000th time. This conversation is over because you’re already playing the game y’all love to play and I’m not having it today. You’re about to be put in the lost and found, you sea-lioning f@ggot.

and I’m not having it today

They had hood chicks back then too?!?

The one on the bottom looks like she kinda bougie and says "girl bye" a lot and call all her friends "bi#ch".

The one on top look like she mix tobacco with her weed and be scaming n1ggas to buy fake designer clothes

The guy who doesn't know the difference between Greece and France/Germany/Scandinavia wants to talk about "ret@rded"

so what happened to all these imaginary, "pure", "Black" Mescalero Apaches then? did they ride their unicorns back to Wakanda?

Oh you wanna look at Egypt now huh

WARNING: (brutal L incoming)



The tombs of ancient Egypt have yielded golden collars and ivory bracelets, but another treasure — human DNA — has proved elusive. Now, scientists have captured sweeping genomic information from Egyptian mummies. It reveals that mummies were closely related to ancient Middle Easterners, hinting that northern Africans might have different genetic roots from people south of the Sahara desert.

The study, published on 30 May in Nature Communications1, includes data from 90 mummies buried between 1380 bc, during Egypt’s New Kingdom, and ad 425, in the Roman era. The findings show that the mummies’ closest kin were ancient farmers from a region that includes present-day Israel and Jordan. Modern Egyptians, by contrast, have inherited more of their DNA from central Africans.

Archaeological discoveries and historical documents suggest close ties between Egypt and the Middle East, but “it is very nice that this study has now provided empirical evidence for this at the genetic level”, says evolutionary anthropologist Omer Gokcumen of the State University of New York at Buffalo.

Egypt’s searing climate and the ancient practice of embalming bodies has made the recovery of intact genetic material daunting. The first DNA sequences thought to be from a mummy2 were probably the result of modern contamination, and many scientists are sceptical3 of purported genetic information acquired from the mummy of King Tutankhamun4.

The latest analysis succeeded by bypassing soft tissue — often abundant in Egyptian mummies — to seek DNA from bone and teeth. Researchers carefully screened the DNA to rule out contamination from anyone who had handled the mummies since their excavation a century ago in the ancient town of Abusir el-Meleq.

“More than half of the mummies we studied had pretty decent DNA preservation,” says co-author Johannes Krause, a palaeogeneticist at the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History in Jena, Germany.

The team “succeeds where previous studies on Egyptian mummies have failed or fallen short”, says Hannes Schroeder, a palaeo*geneticist at the University of Copenhagen. Now, researchers can hope to answer questions such as whether immigration drove ancient-Egyptian population growth, adds Sonia Zakrzewski, a bioarchaeologist at the University of Southampton, UK.

The scientists obtained information about variations in mitochondrial DNA, which is passed from mother to child, from 90 mummies. Because of contamination, the team was able to acquire detailed nuclear DNA, which is inherited from both parents, from only three mummies.

Both types of genomic material showed that ancient Egyptians shared little DNA with modern sub-Saharan Africans. Instead, their closest relatives were people living during the Neolithic and Bronze ages in an area known as the Levant. Strikingly, the mummies were more closely related to ancient Europeans and Anatolians than to modern Egyptians.

The researchers say that there was probably a pulse of sub-Saharan African DNA into Egypt roughly 700 years ago. The mixing of ancient Egyptians and Africans from further south means that modern Egyptians can trace 8% more of their ancestry to sub-Saharan Africans than can the mummies from Abusir el-Meleq.

The new data can’t explain why the ancient Egyptians were so tightly aligned with people from the Middle East. Was it the result of migration, or were the Stone Age hunter-gatherers of northern Africa genetically similar to those of the Levant? It’s too early to tell, Krause says, but there’s a better chance now of getting answers. “This is the first glimpse of the genetic history of Egypt,” he says. “But it’s really just the start.”

The Bible is correct not science in this regard.

They only test mummies from the a certain time period for a reason.

Go look at the teat Diop did on the mummies.

You jus racist and mad. You don't have any facts.

I guess you mad because your race is mingled for real and yall all mixed up.

You don't know whether to be white or Indian

They talkiled about the white man raping are women, but allele them Mexico bithces got fu#ked back then.


Made a new race you mingled metizo fu#k