He wouldnt be online in cancel culture era talking his sh1t . pretty sure he dgaf .
Yes because felons did something to have the right taken. But does it mean that everyone who isn't a felon should automatically be entitled to one
He didn't say traveling he said driving
Wtf are you doing driving goin no where. Wtf would they be driving when they wrote these “rights”. Save your ill conceived logic for people who don’t study language…he is only fooling you not me
This concept is further amplified in 11 Am.Jur., Constitutional Law, § 329, p. 1135 wherein it is said:
"Personal liberty largely consists of the right of locomotion -to go where and when one pleases - only so far restrained as the rights of others may make it necessary for the welfare of all other citizens. The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horse drawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
The drivers in the cases Bernard v. Minnesota, Birchfield v. North Dakota, and Beylund v. Levi are arguing that states cannot charge an individual with a crime for refusing a blood or breath test that was conducted without a warrant. They essentially state that this action constitutes an unreasonable search, because it is severely intrusive, does not fall within any of the exceptions to the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement, and cannot be justified as reasonable given the fact that there is nothing stopping the government from simply obtaining warrants for these tests.
The States, specifically North Dakota and Minnesota have offered multiple rationales justifying their laws. The States argue: a blood or breath test for the presence of alcohol falls within the warrant exception of “search incident to arrest”;
Teaching men how to be men should def be a priority. But we need to define those masculine qualities. Otherwise this is just random rambling.
Also buddy said that bearing arms is a constitutional right and therefore you don't need a license... So any and every American citizen should have a right to It? The lack of restriction is how the crazies are getting guns in the first place. Idk if we should be telling people that you shouldn't need a license to have one
What he mean by hallway?
Generally speaking I rock with Joe, but this a bunch of rambling disconnected points. He could’ve worded this better .
Teaching men how to be men should def be a priority. But we need to define those masculine qualities. Otherwise this is just random rambling.
Also buddy said that bearing arms is a constitutional right and therefore you don't need a license... So any and every American citizen should have a right to It? The lack of restriction is how the crazies are getting guns in the first place. Idk if we should be telling people that you shouldn't need a license to have one
Judge Joe brown doesn't have a checkmark? Wff
We can't even shame the King Vons, Lil Durks, Pop Smokes and FBG ducks in our communities without coddling them, claiming they're a "product of their environment" and that "nobody is perfect". FGB Duck got gunned down and when people said he was going to hell for the life he lived, his fans became good Christians just in time to say nobody knew what his relationship with god was like so it wasn't our place to judge, plus "his mom is grieving".
We can't even shame gangs without the inevitable optimist repeating that bullsh1t a$s mission statement from 1964: "Gangs were formed to protecc da hood"
We still got negroes trying to unleash Larry Hoover back on the streets, throwing concerts n sh1t because "if da OGs were out, there would be order wit da young jits"
Sadly masculinity and perceived alpha behavior amongst our people has often been introduced and glorified through the examples listed.
:roseidk:
we can speculate or you can side with.. the judge as his speculation somehow overrules freedumb
Dudes is agents if you are in here in defense of their admiralty bs.
Supreme Court Has The Opportunity To Declare That Driving A Right Not Merely A Privilege
All of them think that they're Teflon. Which makes the fall from grace even greater.