Have you been 'Boxden'? Enemies of the State: THE OP LIST PART I - page 5

iDon't know about being safe homie but an AI gave this analysis of you:

historical observations of Boxden discussions information about the poster **@BrooklynDamien** is less prominent. Here's a summary of what was commonly associated with this username:

1. **Activity & Focus:**
* Primarily active in **The Locker Room (General Forum)** and occasionally in the **Sports section** (especially NBA).
* Appeared to be a **regular but not necessarily ultra-high-volume poster**. He wasn't typically mentioned among the *most* notorious or instantly recognizable names.

2. **Persona & Style:**
* **Brooklyn-Centric:** As the username suggests, his identity was strongly tied to representing a **Brooklyn perspective**. He often chimed in on topics related to NYC, borough rivalries (especially vs. Bronx, Queens, NJ), NYC culture, and local issues.
* **Defensive of Brooklyn:** Frequently engaged in arguments defending Brooklyn's reputation, its neighborhoods, rappers, sports teams (Nets), or simply countering stereotypes or criticisms from posters representing other areas.
* **Opinionated:** Like most active Boxden users, he shared strong opinions on current events, hip-hop, sports, and social issues, often filtered through his Brooklyn lens.
* **Confrontational (Typical for Boxden):** Engaged in arguments and debates, which is standard forum behavior. His confrontations often stemmed from defending Brooklyn or clashing with posters from rival areas.
* **Less Distinctive Language:** Unlike many, he didn't have a widely recognized, unique linguistic style (like heavy patois). His posting style was more typical of general Boxden discourse – informal, slang-heavy, and direct.

3. **Content Themes:**
* **NYC/Brooklyn Affairs:** Local news, gentrification, borough comparisons, NYC politics, defending Brooklyn rappers or cultural figures.
* **NBA:** Discussions about the Brooklyn Nets, NBA news, and player debates (likely with a Brooklyn bias).
* **Hip-Hop:** Commentary on rap music, especially artists from Brooklyn or NYC, and regional rap beefs.
* **Social/Political Commentary:** Weighing in on national or local issues, often from a perspective perceived as representative of a certain Brooklyn demographic.
* **Arguments:** Engaging in the frequent "stan wars," location wars (Bronx vs. BK, NYC vs. elsewhere), and general forum disputes.

4. **Perception:**
* Seen as a **staunch Brooklyn representative** within the forum's often location-centric arguments.
* Considered a **solid poster** by some who shared his perspective or appreciated the borough representation.
* Viewed as **argumentative or biased** by others, particularly those from rival areas or who disagreed with his takes.
* Generally **less polarizing or meme-worthy** than other boxden characters. He was more of a "known regular" than a major forum personality.

**Key Takeaways:**

* **Core Identity:** His defining characteristic was being a vocal **representative and defender of Brooklyn** in forum discussions.
* **Activity:** Active primarily in general (Locker Room) and sports discussions, but not among the *most* prolific or infamous posters.
* **Style:** Opinionated and confrontational in a way typical for Boxden, but without a unique linguistic hook.
* **Impact:** More of a recognizable "regular" than a major forum-wide personality or source of significant controversy/memes.

**Important Caveats:**

* **Subjectivity:** This reflects common perceptions within Boxden discussions about this poster.

Cointelpro type sh1t.

[
Weasel - He shows feet in racial chats.
- Collector of odd desires, secretly wants to fu#k his mom.

- Rejected by mother at birth, breast fed by father until 13.
- He likes them young.
eligion - Lusts after own sister.
igitalSC - Promoter with niches such as, horse on guy.
- Lonely and possibly very gay.

- Does not want his girl to know he obsesses over older men.
M - His mom was a hooker, possibly still hooking
.

Meh. I don't follow the Nets. Notable talk I've had about them would be the restricted free agent they're fu#king over or how they fu#ked ky over with the shots sh1t. Not a fan of the organization. I'm guessing the ai assumed all that bc of my name. Post up from just yesterday trying to play bk n1ggas I ain't have nothing to say in there. I don't feel the need to defend Brooklyn in general. Just be speaking my mind and I have no idea what rappers I'm defending from Brooklyn lol I stated how I don't fw jay bc he disrupted the NFL movement and even how I ain't trying to hear Joey bc he jumped in the beef rap bullsh1t to promote his music. The analysis is flaw but what you do, use a site scraper? Or just typed in the url with my user name as the focus?

Word, The reason I asked cause it’s connected to your name

Just typed your user name in the LLM. But it seems that having a named tied to a city the AI doesn't really do a deep dive. It just provides a vague pro-city evaluation of the user. Which most people are pro-city. So if you wanted to be somewhat anonymous choosing a name like @LasvegasRobert or Bobby would inspire the AI to just give blanket summaries about your post and comments. But a name like Galaxy100 allows for it to scrape a site more accurately to hone in and analyze specific things you typed

With the name PsyOp

how the hell do you even remember all these people and what type of poster they are??

I know about 15 and most are my packers family, ALL the weak threads are baggio, the n1ggas who only post th0ts and others like strungout, reelife etc


Then of course the n1ggas like kalua and Mavs who only post about Drake and Kendrick



But how the fu#k do u have a file on all these people? And why?

Damn man, somebody do mine lol (pause)

The fact this mothafu#ka has a list of people on this forum, should tell everyone exactly what he is.

That's hella ironic. Ai like oh yeah, jay z Stan fo shoooo

favorite song the take over, least favorite song ether

Not all of them are sh1tty, I'm using an LLM that is seldom used but accurate. So I picked a random user here for it to analyze: Language

I'm well aware that some are better than others.