registerlogin | squad up
  3,354 HIPHOP SPORTS WILD ISH NEWS open menu
THOTTIES        TV/MOVIES        GAMING        RANDOM ISH        GOOD EATS        BXWF        GEAR        GUAP        TECH

icon Nov. 27| 🇺🇸 Teófimo López vs 🇦🇺 George Kambosos Jnr. |DAZN: 8 pm ET/5 pm PT - page 34

ADVERTISEMENT
People viewing this now  1   0 bx goons and 1 bystanders Share this on Twitter       Share this on Facebook

 
topics gone triple plat - Number 1 spot 3X PLAT section sports
Who is winning this match???
Teófimo López 14 100.00%
George Kambosos Jr. 0 0%
Draw 0 0%
Voters: 14.   (BX member poll)

34/35
                   34       
avatar
psylence2k triple plat x2
Props 8 K    
  '04 
 CJ Schwarz said
Why would I stop bring up the original Franchise Rules? It's clear they made a mistake and they're too prideful to admit it.

Also Peoples is about unification over mandatory. He and the IBF would have let Lopez fight Haney instead of Kambosos. However Teo Sr. and Teo Jr. wanted to move ahead with the Kambosos fight instead.

It's all good now. We'll have an undisputed Champ at lightweight soon if Haney wins Saturday. If he loses we may have to wait until the summer.
because at this point people should already know what it is. When the WBC FIRST changed their rules. Okay, express shock and dislike but by now people should already know they changed the rules because well.....it's their belt so they can do that but people making it seem like it's something new and shocking that no one is noticing. The WBC basically made it clear by now they chose to change it but hey it's their belt.

It's like in YOUR house, one week you can tell you guests one set of rules. The next week it can be completely different and they can complain but guess what ? It's YOUR house. YOU make the rules.

I'm not saying people can't say they don't like it, sure, say you don't like it personally, but the WBC makes the rules.

Sure maybe the IBF would've let Lopez fight Haney if he chose to but the whole franchise situation was still new and complicated. Lopez was being called undisputed by the WBC so Haney might not have even been looked at as a unification since it's the same organization. That would be like the WBA super champ choosing to fight the WBA regular champ. Would they call that person the unified champion after that ? Very likely not. Unified typically means two different organizations.

The whole undisputed debate is a mess now but the WBC is calling Kambosos undisputed which means they had full intention of giving him the franchise belt and they also still recognize the franchise belt as their top belt.

If the WBC wants to just silence everything they should've just made a franchise belt for every division then it basically becomes like the WBA's super champion belt. Sulaiman basically said it was the same type of thing.


Last edited by psylence2k; 11-29-2021 at 09:03 AM..
avatar
No Religion triple plat x14
Props 76 K    
  '18 
 yousabi#ch said
Like I said he doesnt stand a chance nor has he deserved it. Who the fu#k has this clown Charlo beaten
 HubrisOfMan said
Address what I said or step off the porch.
I took all comers and they all had to accept the light.
emoji
Rocky Fielding, JCC Jr, Avni Yildrum, Callum Smith, Liam Smith, Ilunga Makabu.... who have they beaten? You're a shameless, d1ck eating man fan.
emoji


Last edited by No Religion; 11-29-2021 at 09:38 AM..
avatar
killadre triple plat x4
Props 92 K    
  '04 
emoji
Kam beat that boy so bad he disabled his Twitter account
+6   
avatar
Mexicanelvis
Props 16 K    
  '15 
 psylence2k said
If there were no WBC belts on the line then what WBC belts was Kambosos holding after the fight ???

Teo use to run around with two WBC belts.

Now Kambosos has two WBC belts, plus the WBC shirt they give to the new champs.

emoji
Cause WBC is full of sh1t and gonna try to extort this dude lol

It doesn't matter what the WBC want to call him on twitter or what belts they give him, unless they strip Devin Haney of his belt then there is no Undisputed Lightweight Champion

The undisputed champ needs the WBA, WBC, IBF and WBO world titles at the same time, the current WBC lightweight champion is Devin Haney
emoji


Lets use their twitter for another example, what do they say is happening this weekend? Oh the Lightweight World title is being defended, by who?

[see tweet]

That doesn't look like Kambosos to me
+2   
avatar
HubrisOfMan
Props 7 K    
  '20 
 No Religion said
Rocky Fielding, JCC Jr, Avni Yildrum, Callum Smith, Liam Smith, Ilunga Makabu.... who have they beaten? You're a shameless, d1ck eating man fan.
emoji
Tell me who Jermall Charlo beat to gain the WBC title
emoji


You a fan of underdogs who just want to skip the line.
avatar
HubrisOfMan
Props 7 K    
  '20 
 Mexicanelvis said
Cause WBC is full of sh1t and gonna try to extort this dude lol

It doesn't matter what the WBC want to call him on twitter or what belts they give him, unless they strip Devin Haney of his belt then there is no Undisputed Lightweight Champion

The undisputed champ needs the WBA, WBC, IBF and WBO world titles at the same time, the current WBC lightweight champion is Devin Haney
emoji


Lets use their twitter for another example, what do they say is happening this weekend? Oh the Lightweight World title is being defended, by who?

emoji

That doesn't look like Kambosos to me
Who did Devin beat to become the WBC Belt holder?
What was the name of the champ he defeated in combat by 12 rounds of boxing?

emoji
avatar
Mexicanelvis
Props 16 K    
  '15 
 HubrisOfMan said
Who did Devin beat to become the WBC Belt holder?
What was the name of the champ he defeated in combat by 12 rounds of boxing?

emoji
The same way lomachenko won his when he beat Luke Campbell for a vacant belt, he beat Zaur Abdullaev for a vacant belt… Lomachenko was then stripped and Haney became lightweight world champ, then he had 3 defenses of that title with another one coming this weekend.

It doesn’t matter what new belts WBC wants to create, if you don’t have the WBC Lightweight World champion belt you are not undisputed.
avatar
HubrisOfMan
Props 7 K    
  '20 
 Mexicanelvis said
The same way lomachenko won his when he beat Luke Campbell for a vacant belt, he beat Zaur Abdullaev for a vacant belt… Lomachenko was then stripped and Haney became lightweight world champ, then he had 3 defenses of that title with another one coming this weekend.

It doesn’t matter what new belts WBC wants to create, if you don’t have the WBC Lightweight World champion belt you are not undisputed.
WRONG, WRONG

Loma was NOT stripped.
These are NOT semantics.

Loma was elevated and Haney being the Interim Champ was ELEVATED in response.

"In October 2019, Haney became the youngest (i.e. latest-born) world champion in boxing when he was elevated as the WBC lightweight champion after previous WBC lightweight champion Vasiliy Lomachenko was promoted to "Franchise Champion" by the WBC"
+1   
avatar
Mexicanelvis
Props 16 K    
  '15 
 HubrisOfMan said
WRONG, WRONG

Loma was NOT stripped.
These are NOT semantics.

Loma was elevated and Haney being the Interim Champ was ELEVATED in response.

"In October 2019, Haney became the youngest (i.e. latest-born) world champion in boxing when he was elevated as the WBC lightweight champion after previous WBC lightweight champion Vasiliy Lomachenko was promoted to "Franchise Champion" by the WBC"
What’s it called when they take your belt and say someone else has it now, regardless of whatever honorary titles they gave him he was stripped and Haney became the holder of the WBC Lightweight World Champion one of the belts required to be considered undisputed champ

emoji


Here’s the actual notes from the WBCs 57th convention

Unified world champion Lomachenko, who won the vacant WBC belt by decision over Luke Campbell on Aug. 31, was stripped of the belt and given the honorary title of "franchise champion," the second in WBC history since its recent creation for Canelo Alvarez. Interim titlist Haney, who elevated to the WBC's world titleholder, had been scheduled to defend the interim belt on Nov. 9 against an opponent to be named and now will defend the full title. Also, the Nov. 2 bout between former titleholders Javier Fortuna and Jesus Cuellar was approved as a final eliminator to determine Haney's mandatory challenger.
-1   
avatar
psylence2k triple plat x2
Props 8 K    
  '04 
 Mexicanelvis said
Cause WBC is full of sh1t and gonna try to extort this dude lol

It doesn't matter what the WBC want to call him on twitter or what belts they give him, unless they strip Devin Haney of his belt then there is no Undisputed Lightweight Champion

The undisputed champ needs the WBA, WBC, IBF and WBO world titles at the same time, the current WBC lightweight champion is Devin Haney
emoji


Lets use their twitter for another example, what do they say is happening this weekend? Oh the Lightweight World title is being defended, by who?

emoji

That doesn't look like Kambosos to me
You said the franchise title wasn't on the line because they didn't vote.

That was a lie.

Kambosos is now the franchise champion. It's now a title you can win through a fight, therefore it's a FACT that it's a championship belt because Kambosos was announced WBC franchise CHAMPION as soon as he won. The rules changed a while back because the WBC said so. It's their belt/organization, they can do that.

It DOES matter what the WBC says because the WBC runs their own organization. They make the rules, not some random person sitting behind a keyboard

You're saying Kambosos isn't a champion with a WBC belt because there's someone else in the organizatoin being called a champ also ? You want to use twitter as an example ? Okay, let's do that.

Let's look at a picture from a recent WBA tweet:



What does that say ? Tank vs Cruz for the light championship ?

By YOUR logic, does that mean Tank is the real WBA champion ? Since the WBA is calling him one through a tweet ? I mean that's YOUR logic.

The WBC already said they treat the franchise like the WBA super championship. The top title at the WBA is the super champ who is now Kambosos vs the WBA regular champion who is Tank for the WBA. Haney is the equivalent of the regular champ (Tank/WBA) for the WBC. Sulaiman said himself the franchise is like the WBA super champ (top belt).

Haney is defending his lightweight championship soon ? Okay, well so is Tank. Gervonta is also a lightweight champion.

At the end of the day the WBC can make their own rules because well it's their organization.

IF they really wanted to shut everyone up they could just introduce a franchise belt at every weight class and that really would drive the point home that it's basically the same as the WBA super champion.

Bottom line is you said there were no WBC belts on the line at last Sunday's fight. That was a lie and you were wrong.


Last edited by psylence2k; 11-29-2021 at 09:15 PM..
+1   
avatar
psylence2k triple plat x2
Props 8 K    
  '04 
 Mexicanelvis said
It doesn’t matter what new belts WBC wants to create, if you don’t have the WBC Lightweight World champion belt you are not undisputed.
You keep saying "world champion". You do know the franchise is a world championship too right ?

That's why it says "WORLD CHAMPION" on the franchise belt. There's TWO world lightweight champions now at the WBC. Just like there is at the WBA.

A Franchise world champion then a regular world champion. Just like the WBA has a super world champion (Kambosos) and a regular world champion ( Tank).

You're saying because Lomachenko was elevated to a new higher belt he was no longer champion.

Was Lennox Lewis no longer WBA champion when the WBA made the super champ designation for him and elevated him ? When the WBA elevated Floyd to super champion, was he no longer a world champion ?


Last edited by psylence2k; 11-29-2021 at 08:16 PM..
+1   
avatar
RustyLorcin
Props 3 K    
  '08 
 tre0624 said
That's a lie. Tell me who said Ali, Frazier, Foreman, sugar ray Leonard, Hagler was a bum after 1 loss?

Stop being stupid bro. That sh1t got like this because of floyd
Low iq poster. Go see how undefeated fighters have been marketed since Marciano.

Check how sugar ray Leonard was marketed before he got his a$s whooped by Duran. Then check afterwards, he basically made a career of cheating dudes on fights, before cherry picking an out of shape and coked out camacho and getting whooped.

Foreman was always known as overrated. So that doesn't matter and even then when he was undefeated he was a "bad dude" then he got whooped and his aura left and retired.
Ali was marketed differently after he lost. He wasn't the greatest ever then or was he? Go look at the promotional stuff from that era.
Frazier was overrated. Only one good win.
Hagler was what he was. Dude lost to inferior fighters and let a lightweight move up and give him a close fight. Never moved up in weight. Only after the fact is Hagler looked at as a top 20 atg. During that time he was likely looked at differentl, probably in similar way to how people looked at GGG. But you wouldn't know you aren't old enough to know how the dude was marketed and you're posting based on emotions. He lost early on his career too. But his greatness aged with time. But once again i dont think his whole thing was "being unbeatable" or the greatest. Just a tough a$s middle weight action fighter.

Now look at rocky marciano and that undefeated record. Marketed as a god.

Chavez at 89-0 was marketed as a god.

Floyd yeah 45-0+ marketed as a god as well.

The undefeated record sh1t started with Marciano, then into thr 60s-70s with ali, sugar ray, then into the 80s with chavez, 90+ calzaghe, ottke, etc, and so on. It wasn't floyd that started it.


Last edited by RustyLorcin; 11-29-2021 at 10:33 PM..
avatar
Mexicanelvis
Props 16 K    
  '15 
 psylence2k said
You keep saying "world champion". You do know the franchise is a world championship too right ?

That's why it says "WORLD CHAMPION" on the franchise belt. There's TWO world lightweight champions now at the WBC. Just like there is at the WBA.

A Franchise world champion then a regular world champion. Just like the WBA has a super world champion (Kambosos) and a regular world champion ( Tank).

You're saying because Lomachenko was elevated to a new higher belt he was no longer champion.

Was Lennox Lewis no longer WBA champion when the WBA made the super champ designation for him and elevated him ? When the WBA elevated Floyd to super champion, was he no longer a world champion ?
I keep saying “WBC World Lightweight Champion” because that’s what the title Haney holds is called. That’s one of the 4 major titles a fighter needs to hold to be considered “Undisputed”, “WBC Franchise Champion” isn’t a title it’s a special designation, and having that designation is not one of the requirements for a fighter to be “undisputed”

The WBC did change the rules to make it transferable, but only by vote after the promoters petition for it. Also if I’m not mistaken WBA has the super and regular titles for every weightclass? Is there a franchise champion in every class? No , because it’s just a special designation that the WBC decides to hand out. So it’s not comparable at all to the WBA belts especially because there wasn’t a way for fighters to win the “franchise champion” designation until the WBC fu#ked up and voted to let Teo win it from Loma now Teo lost and they get caught with their d1cks in hand

If the “franchise champion” is higher than the “world champion” why didn’t they have Teos picture on the champions list and Haney as a footnote? If a major WBC belt was on the line why does the DAZN article say

So, what seemed as a grand stage for Lopez to lay out the blueprint for a huge 2022 wound up shaking up boxing with a new holder of three (WBA, WBO and IBF) of the four major lightweight titles . Devin Haney is the WBC lightweight champ and used Saturday night to kick Lopez while he's down.
emoji
it’s confusing as fu#k and that snake Mauricio flip flops on this sh1t every other week, most likely he’s trying to bleed every $ he can out of these fighters.
+1   
avatar
psylence2k triple plat x2
Props 8 K    
  '04 
 Mexicanelvis said
I keep saying “WBC World Lightweight Champion” because that’s what the title Haney holds is called. That’s one of the 4 major titles a fighter needs to hold to be considered “Undisputed”, “WBC Franchise Champion” isn’t a title it’s a special designation, and having that designation is not one of the requirements for a fighter to be “undisputed”

The WBC did change the rules to make it transferable, but only by vote after the promoters petition for it. Also if I’m not mistaken WBA has the super and regular titles for every weightclass? Is there a franchise champion in every class? No , because it’s just a special designation that the WBC decides to hand out. So it’s not comparable at all to the WBA belts especially because there wasn’t a way for fighters to win the “franchise champion” designation until the WBC fu#ked up and voted to let Teo win it from Loma now Teo lost and they get caught with their d1cks in hand

If the “franchise champion” is higher than the “world champion” why didn’t they have Teos picture on the champions list and Haney as a footnote? If a major WBC belt was on the line why does the DAZN article say

emoji
it’s confusing as fu#k and that snake Mauricio flip flops on this sh1t every other week, most likely he’s trying to bleed every $ he can out of these fighters.
RIght Haney is the WBC regular world champion just like Tank is the WBA regular world champion.

Kambosos is currently the Franchise WORLD champion. The WBA puts the super champ above the regular champ. The WBC puts the franchise over the regular champ.

It doesn't matter if there's not a franchise champion in every division. When the WBA first introduced the super champ there wasn't a super champ in every division. It started with just one guy being elevated.

WHO (meaning what authoritative body) says the regular wbc belt (that haney holds) is the one that's needed towards undisputed and not the franchise ? WHO has the authority OVER the WBC to say that ?

Newsflash, there is none. So nobody has that authority except the governing bodies themselves to dictate their own belts. THEY choose what their top belt is and what counts from their own organization towards undisputed. WBC has designated that the franchise is the top prize and it counts from them towards undisputed. How is someone else going to tell the WBC what counts from THEIR organization ?

You may not like it but YOU don't make the rules.

Why is it so hard to understand the fact that an organization can not only MAKE whatever rules they want but also CHANGE the rules whenever they want.

When WBC made the franchise they said it's our HIGHEST belt and we WILL recognize it towards undisputed. What governing body above the WBC can say it's NOT undisputed ? NOBODY. So the WBC has the last word on THEIR belt that comes from THEIR organization because THEY make the rules for THEIR titles and they can also CHANGE the rules whenever THEY want.

Once Teo's petition got approved that was it. I don't think Kambosos petitioned so it's basically functioning as a regular title now BUT even when it wasn't it was still counted towards undisputed by the WBC and there's no one above them that says it can't be seen that way.

but NOW it functions and moves as any other belt. They didn't "F up" just because YOU don't like it. They made a decision to change it because they can do that. It's THEIR belt.

Just because other promoters and networks that don't have Lopez under contract didn't want to mention him as franchise champ doesn't mean anything.

Crawford was ignored by PBC and not shown or mentioned multiple times when talking about 147 champs. That doesn't mean he's not a champ because PBC wanted to ignore him.


Last edited by psylence2k; 11-30-2021 at 03:12 AM..
avatar
Mexicanelvis
Props 16 K    
  '15 
 psylence2k said
RIght Haney is the WBC regular world champion just like Tank is the WBA regular world champion.

Kambosos is currently the Franchise WORLD champion. The WBA puts the super champ above the regular champ. The WBC puts the franchise over the regular champ.

It doesn't matter if there's not a franchise champion in every division. When the WBA first introduced the super champ there wasn't a super champ in every division. It started with just one guy being elevated.

WHO (meaning what authoritative body) says the regular wbc belt (that haney holds) is the one that's needed towards undisputed and not the franchise ? WHO has the authority OVER the WBC to say that ?

Newsflash, there is none. So nobody has that authority except the governing bodies themselves to dictate their own belts. THEY choose what their top belt is and what counts from their own organization towards undisputed. WBC has designated that the franchise is the top prize and it counts from them towards undisputed. How is someone else going to tell the WBC what counts from THEIR organization ?

You may not like it but YOU don't make the rules.

Why is it so hard to understand the fact that an organization can not only MAKE whatever rules they want but also CHANGE the rules whenever they want.

When WBC made the franchise they said it's our HIGHEST belt and we WILL recognize it towards undisputed. What governing body above the WBC can say it's NOT undisputed ? NOBODY. So the WBC has the last word on THEIR belt that comes from THEIR organization because THEY make the rules for THEIR titles and they can also CHANGE the rules whenever THEY want.

Once Teo's petition got approved that was it. I don't think Kambosos petitioned so it's basically functioning as a regular title now BUT even when it wasn't it was still counted towards undisputed by the WBC and there's no one above them that says it can't be seen that way.

but NOW it functions and moves as any other belt. They didn't "F up" just because YOU don't like it. They made a decision to change it because they can do that. It's THEIR belt.

Just because other promoters and networks that don't have Lopez under contract didn't want to mention him as franchise champ doesn't mean anything.

Crawford was ignored by PBC and not shown or mentioned multiple times when talking about 147 champs. That doesn't mean he's not a champ because PBC wanted to ignore him.
Go to 2:30


[see video]

He says Lopez is in his own category free to fight anyone without obligations, and Haney is the lightweight champ that has to fight mandatories. Notice how also calls it a “designation” He doesn’t say sh1t about one being above the world champ belt so stop comparing it to the WBA super and regular belts that both have rankings and mandatories they have to face.

There isn’t an authority that gives someone the “Undisputed”
title, it’s just common knowledge that it’s the WBC, WBA, WBO, and IBF belt holder in one weightclass. Before it looked like this

1922–1963, a boxer who held both the NYSAC and NBA (WBA) world titles simultaneously
1963–1983, a boxer who held both the WBA and WBC world titles simultaneously
1983–2007, a boxer who held the WBA, WBC, and IBF world titles simultaneously
2007–present, a boxer who holds the WBA, WBC, IBF and WBO world titles simultaneously

If the WBC wants to make the franchise belt be their main belt then they need to establish it in every weight class and set up rankings so that fighters can actually win the belt, until then no matter what they say no one is gonna recognize that as part of undisputed
emoji


Edit: I’ve heard Mauricio specifically referring to Teo as “unified” and not “undisputed” so maybe that fu#king weasel shouldn’t be trusted
emoji


Last edited by Mexicanelvis; 11-30-2021 at 09:47 AM..
+1   
avatar
Samich Eater
Props 17 K    
  '17 
 yousabi#ch said
Canelo is boxing he chooses who to fight and when to fight them that’s the thing. He’s the cash cow like flloyd was. They all do it.
Yea but that wasn't the argument. A lot of pro Canelo or Canelo stans state Charlo, Benavidez and Andrade doesn't deserve a fight with Canelo.

They try to justify it with whatever means or excuses they can find. And that's fine. Just call a spade a spade.
+3   
avatar
psylence2k triple plat x2
Props 8 K    
  '04 
 Mexicanelvis said
Go to 2:30

emoji

He says Lopez is in his own category free to fight anyone without obligations, and Haney is the lightweight champ that has to fight mandatories. Notice how also calls it a “designation” He doesn’t say sh1t about one being above the world champ belt so stop comparing it to the WBA super and regular belts that both have rankings and mandatories they have to face.

There isn’t an authority that gives someone the “Undisputed”
title, it’s just common knowledge that it’s the WBC, WBA, WBO, and IBF belt holder in one weightclass. Before it looked like this

1922–1963, a boxer who held both the NYSAC and NBA (WBA) world titles simultaneously
1963–1983, a boxer who held both the WBA and WBC world titles simultaneously
1983–2007, a boxer who held the WBA, WBC, and IBF world titles simultaneously
2007–present, a boxer who holds the WBA, WBC, IBF and WBO world titles simultaneously

If the WBC wants to make the franchise belt be their main belt then they need to establish it in every weight class and set up rankings so that fighters can actually win the belt, until then no matter what they say no one is gonna recognize that as part of undisputed
emoji


Edit: I’ve heard Mauricio specifically referring to Teo as “unified” and not “undisputed” so maybe that fu#king weasel shouldn’t be trusted
emoji

Why do you keep the same things over and over that have already been debunked ?

The franchise is over/above the world champ belt because Sulaiman has said multiples times that it's the HIGHEST honor from the WBC and you have to ELEVATED to it.

Do you know what ELEVATED and HIGHEST means ? Does that mean it's higher or lower ? Superior or inferior ? Over or under ?

Let's use LOGIC and a BASIC understanding of english. The WBC Franchise is OVER the REGULAR title because Sulaiman said it's the HIGHEST honor and Canelo and Loma had to get the WBC regular title first then be voted and approved to be ELEVATED to franchise. Were they lowered or downgraded to franchise ? NO. Like C'mon man, stop acting like you don't know what basic words mean.

Like Sulaiman said the franchise is the HIGHEST honor so even a 5th grader could tell you it's OVER the regular WBC title by simple use of the word HIGHEST. Do you know what happens when you're the HIGHEST ? You're over everything else right ?

You know what WBC has also said ? It counts toward undisputed. You know what else they made happen since last year ? It can be transferred now in fights.

So HOW is it different from any other belt ?

The WBA super can't be used to bypass mandatories ? Yes they can and have. the WBA has gone back and forth and changed on this issue over the years but WBA super champs have definitely used it to not face mandatories.

Keith Thurman was WBA interim and Floyd's mandatory when Floyd was a WBA regular champ. The WBA ELEVATED fFoyd to WBA super champ and Thurman got bumped up to WBA regular champ just like Haney did with the WBC and guess what ? Floyd no longer had to face Thurman.

So Floyd was ELEVATED to a "designation" that allowed him to bypass his mandatory, that also counted towards undisputed if the other belts were collected, and could be transferred in fights.

HOW is that any different than what happened with the Franchise situation ?

There isn’t an authority that gives someone the “Undisputed”
Duh, that's what I just said in the my last post.

Therefore each organization gets to decide what their highest title is and what counts towards undisputed.

and the WBC has said franchise counts and is their highest championship. Doesn't matter if you don't like it. They make the rules for their belts.


If the WBC wants to make the franchise belt be their main belt then they need to establish it in every weight class and set up rankings so that fighters can actually win the belt, until then no matter what they say no one is gonna recognize that as part of undisputed
emoji

Why ? because you said so ? Smh. You still don't understand it's THEIR organization so THEY make the rules.

When the WBA first made up the super championship, they didn't just make one automatically available for every division. You had to be considered and elevated.

Edit: I’ve heard Mauricio specifically referring to Teo as “unified” and not “undisputed” so maybe that fu#king weasel shouldn’t be trusted
emoji
You do know that when you're undisputed you're unified too right ? Unified just means you have two or more of the main belts. When someone is undisputed they're by default also unified. So you can rightfully be addressed as either.


Last edited by psylence2k; 12-01-2021 at 09:58 AM..
avatar
Mexicanelvis
Props 16 K    
  '15 
 psylence2k said
Why do you keep the same things over and over that have already been debunked ?

The franchise is over/above the world champ belt because Sulaiman has said multiples times that it's the HIGHEST honor from the WBC and you have to ELEVATED to it.

Do you know what ELEVATED and HIGHEST means ? Does that mean it's higher or lower ? Superior or inferior ? Over or under ?

Let's use LOGIC and a BASIC understanding of english. The WBC Franchise is OVER the REGULAR title because Sulaiman said it's the HIGHEST honor and Canelo and Loma had to get the WBC regular title first then be voted and approved to be ELEVATED to franchise. Were they lowered or downgraded to franchise ? NO. Like C'mon man, stop acting like you don't know what basic words mean.

Like Sulaiman said the franchise is the HIGHEST honor so even a 5th grader could tell you it's OVER the regular WBC title by simple use of the word HIGHEST. Do you know what happens when you're the HIGHEST ? You're over everything else right ?

You know what WBC has also said ? It counts toward undisputed. You know what else they made happen since last year ? It can be transferred now in fights.

So HOW is it different from any other belt ?

The WBA super can't be used to bypass mandatories ? Yes they can and have. the WBA has gone back and forth and changed on this issue over the years but WBA super champs have definitely used it to not face mandatories.

Keith Thurman was WBA interim and Floyd's mandatory when Floyd was a WBA regular champ. The WBA ELEVATED fFoyd to WBA super champ and Thurman got bumped up to WBA regular champ just like Haney did with the WBC and guess what ? Floyd no longer had to face Thurman.

So Floyd was ELEVATED to a "designation" that allowed him to bypass his mandatory, that also counted towards undisputed if the other belts were collected, and could be transferred in fights.

HOW is that any different than what happened with the Franchise situation ?



Duh, that's what I just said in the my last post.

Therefore each organization gets to decide what their highest title is and what counts towards undisputed.

and the WBC has said franchise counts and is their highest championship. Doesn't matter if you don't like it. They make the rules for their belts.





Why ? because you said so ? Smh. You still don't understand it's THEIR organization so THEY make the rules.

When the WBA first made up the super championship, they didn't just make one automatically available for every division. You had to be considered and elevated.


You do know that when you're undisputed you're unified too right ? Unified just means you have two or more of the main belts. When someone is undisputed they're by default also unified. So you can rightfully be addressed as either.
You breathe with your mouth open don’t you
emoji


WBC doesn’t decide who’s undisputed they can market whoever they want as undisputed but the only way you can be considered that is if you have the “WBC World Champion” belt as well as the other major titles go look at every boxing publication and website and tell me who’s listed as the Lightweight world champion, go to the WBC website and tell me who the lightweight world champion is. The franchise designation has nothing to do with the WBA belts
+1   
avatar
psylence2k triple plat x2
Props 8 K    
  '04 
 Mexicanelvis said
You breathe with your mouth open don’t you
emoji


WBC doesn’t decide who’s undisputed they can market whoever they want as undisputed but the only way you can be considered that is if you have the “WBC World Champion” belt as well as the other major titles go look at every boxing publication and website and tell me who’s listed as the Lightweight world champion, go to the WBC website and tell me who the lightweight world champion is. The franchise designation has nothing to do with the WBA belts
Don't be mad at me because you don't understand basic english about how highest and elevated means something is above other things and you keep repeating the same debunked points over and over again.

WBC decides which one of THEIR belts counts towards undisputed.

We're not arguing about the IBF, WBO, or WBA champ are we ?

We're arguing over WBC. Who makes the rules about the WBC champion ?

Oh that's right the WBC not you from behind a keyboard.

Like I said with the WBA super champ. WBA super champs in the past have been elevated by WBA consideration, the mandatory interim becomes bumped up to the regular champ, the super champ then gets to bypass a mandatory and the super champ is the top champ and counts towards undisputed.

HOW is the WBC franchise different at this point ? You can't answer. Which is why your bad logic keeps jumping all over the place. Why is no one arguing the WBA regular champ Tank is the real champ ?

When Floyd was elevated to super champ and didn't have to fight Thurman did people say "Nah Floyd aint the real champ until he fights Thurman" ??? Nah they didn't. Tell me how this situation is any different ??

Let's still not forget this all started from you saying no WBC belts were on the line last sunday which you were clearly wrong about since Kambosos is walking around with two WBC belts.

You also said the WBC board didn't vote for the franchise belt to be up for grabs so it wasn't on the line last Sunday which is also wrong.


Last edited by psylence2k; 12-01-2021 at 11:49 PM..
avatar
victorious187
Props 4 K    
  '05 
Haney is champion, franchise is a higher title, teofimo was undisputed for defeating loma, kambosas defeated teo. Haney now has a shot at fighting kambosas after he gets through jojo. Super champs and Franchise champs, whoever wins is going to drop the WBC belt and keep Franchise since it is held higher
avatar
Proveone triple plat x5
Props 167 K    
  '16 
 CJ Schwarz said
Final Press Conference
emoji
emoji
You got the boxing threads on lock, you should post a thread on this :
emoji
avatar
Adwerdz triple plat x223
Props 331 K    
  '04 
 Proveone said
You got the boxing threads on lock, you should post a thread on this :
emoji
Just made one bi#ch a$s n1gga
-1   
avatar
Proveone triple plat x5
Props 167 K    
  '16 
 Adwerdz said
Just made one bi#ch a$s n1gga
Yea I just saw that and posted in it, you fu#king lame. Acting like you own the rights to the story
avatar
Adwerdz triple plat x223
Props 331 K    
  '04 
 Proveone said
Yea I just saw that and posted in it, you fu#king lame. Acting like you own the rights to the story
You seen my thread then ran and told dude to make a thread, you a bi#ch a$s hatin pillow talking a$s n1gga in real life I see
emoji
-1   
avatar
Proveone triple plat x5
Props 167 K    
  '16 
 Adwerdz said
You seen my thread then ran and told dude to make a thread, you a bi#ch a$s hatin pillow talking a$s n1gga in real life I see
emoji
Wrong, but you need to get a life my guy. The internet is not real
34/35
                   34       
say something...


Sign me up
 
 
yesterday
most viewed right now
+50
Video inside Bruh I’ve Watched This Clip A Million Times And Never Caught This Until..
25 sectionmovies  •  99 replies  •  1 hr ago
by JohnnyCage202  •  20 hr
most viewed right now
+27
Dolph's final moments played in court today.
10 sectionhiphop  •  143 replies  •  1 hr ago
by Victor  •  22 hr
back to top
register iwantin contact privacyprivacy/DMCA