Will Bush cancel the 2008 election?

most viewed right now
 124
Video inside US DEPARMENT OF DEFENSE RELEASES NAVY JET ENCOUNTER WITH UFO VIDEO :mjd..
23 comments
@wild'ish
most viewed right now
 84
Steph Kegels
96 comments
@thotsdimesetc
most viewed right now
 82
Kevin Hart X-mad card
72 comments
@movies
most viewed right now
 64
Nicki Minaj speaks up against White rappers taking over the charts
267 comments
@hiphop

section   (0 bx goons and 1 bystanders) Share this on Twitter   Share this on Facebook
 

Props Slaps
 08-01-2007, 03:27 PM         #1
6358 pageviews
172 comments


Karl Spackler 
space
space
space
$n/a | Props total:  
Will Bush cancel the 2008 election?
 

 
Will Bush cancel the 2008 election?


By Harvey Wasserman & Bob Fitrakis
Online Journal Guest Writers
Aug 1, 2007, 01:11


It is time to think about the "unthinkable."

The Bush administration has both the inclination and the power to cancel the 2008 election.

The GOP strategy for another electoral theft in 2008 has taken clear shape, though we must a.ssume there is much more we don't know.

But we must also a.ssume that if it appears to Team Bush/Cheney/Rove that the GOP will lose the 2008 election anyway (as it lost in Ohio 2006), we cannot ignore the possibility that they would simply cancel the election. Those who think this crew will quietly walk away from power are simply not paying attention.

The real question is not how or when they might do it. It's how, realistically, we can stop them.

In Florida 2000, Team Bush had a game plan involving a handful of tactics. With Jeb Bush in the governor's mansion, the GOP used a combination of disenfranchisement, intimidation, faulty ballots, electronic voting fraud, a rigged vote count and an aborted recount, courtesy of the US Supreme Court.

A compliant Democrat (Al Gore) allowed the coup to be completed.

In Ohio 2004, the arsenal of dirty tricks exploded. Based in Columbus, we have documented more than a hundred different tactics used to steal the 20 electoral votes that gave Bush a second term. More are still surfacing. As a result of the King-Lincoln-Bronzeville federal lawsuit (in which we are plaintiff and attorney) we have now been informed that 56 of the 88 counties in Ohio violated federal law by destroying election records, thus preventing a definitive historical recount.

As in 2000, a compliant Democrat (John Kerry) allowed the coup to proceed.

For 2008 we expect the list of vote theft maneuvers to escalate yet again. We are already witnessing a coordinated nationwide drive to destroy voter registration organizations and to disenfranchise millions of minority, poor and young voters.

This carefully choreographed campaign is complemented by the widespread use of electronic voting machines. As reported by the Government Accountability Office, Princeton University, the Brennan Center, the Carter-Baker Commission, US Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) and others, these machines can be easily used to flip an election. They were integral to stealing both the 2000 and 2004 elections. Efforts to make their source codes transparent, or to require a usable paper trail on a federal level, have thus far failed. A discriminatory Voter ID requirement may also serve as the gateway to a national identification card.

Overall, the GOP will have at its command even more weapons of election theft in 2008 than it did in Ohio 2004, which jumped exponentially from Florida 2000. The Rovian GOP is nothing if not tightly organized to do this with ruthless efficiency. Expect everything that was used these past two presidential elections to surface again in 2008 in far more states, with far more efficiency, and many new dirty tricks added in.

But in Ohio 2006, the GOP learned a hard lesson. Its candidate for governor was J. Kenneth Blackwell. The secretary of state was the essential on-the-ground operative in the theft of Ohio 2004.

When he announced for governor, many Ohioans joked that "Ken Blackwell will never lose an election where he counts the votes."

But lose he did . . . along with the GOP candidates for secretary of state, attorney general and US Senate.

By our calculations, despite massive grassroots scrutiny, the Republicans stole in excess of 6 percent of the Ohio vote in 2006. But they still lost.

Why? Because they were so massively unpopular that even a 6 percent bump couldn't save them. Outgoing Governor Bob Taft, who pleaded guilty to four misdemeanors while in office, left town with a 7 percent approval rating (that's not a typo). Blackwell entered the last week of the campaign down 30 percent in some polls.

So while the GOP still had control of the electoral machinery here in 2006, the public tide against them was simply too great to hold back, even through the advanced art and science of modern Rovian election theft.

In traditional electoral terms, that may also be the case in 2008. Should things proceed as they are now, it's hard to imagine any Republican candidate going into the election within striking distance. The potential variations are many, but the graffiti on the wall is clear.

What's also clear is that this administration has a deep, profound and uncompromised contempt for democracy, for the rule of law, and for the US Constitution. When George W. Bush went on the record (twice) as saying he has nothing against dictatorship, as long as he can be dictator, it was a clear and present policy statement.

Who really believes this crew will walk quietly away from power? They have the motivation, the money and the method for doing away with the electoral process altogether. So why wouldn't they?


Last edited by Karl Spackler; 08-01-2007 at 03:29 PM..

172 comments for "Will Bush cancel the 2008 election?"

 08-01-2007, 03:28 PM         #2
Karl Spackler  OP
space
space
space
$n/a | Props total:  
The groundwork for dismissal of both the legislative and judicial branch has been carefully laid. The litany is well-known, but worth a very partial listing:

The continuation of the drug war, and the USAPATRIOT Act, Homeland Security Act and other dictatorial laws prompted by the 9/11/2001 terror attacks, have decimated the Bill of Rights, and shredded the traditional American right to due process of law, freedom from official surveillance, arbitrary violence, and far more.

The current attorney general, Alberto Gonzales, has not backed away from his announcement to Congress that the Constitution does not guarantee habeas corpus. The administration continues to act on the a.ssumption that it can arrest anyone at any time and hold them without notification or trial for as long as it wants.

The establishment of the Department of Homeland Security has given it additional hardware to decimate the basic human rights of our citizenry. Under the guise of dealing with the "immigration problem," large concentration camps are under construction around the US.

The administration has endorsed and is exercising its "right" to employ torture, contrary to the Eighth Amendment and to a wide range of international treaties, which Gonzales has labeled "quaint."

With more than 200 "signing statements," the administration acts on its belief that the "unitary executive" trumps the power of the legislative branch in any instance it chooses. This belief has been further enforced with the administration's use of a wide range of precedent-setting arguments to keep its functionaries from testifying before Congress.

There is much more. In all instances, the 109th Congress and the public have rolled over without significant resistance.

Most crucial now are Presidential Directive #51, Executive Orders #13303, #13315, #13350, #13364, #13422, #13438, and more, by which Bush has granted himself an immense arsenal of powers for which the term "dictatorial" is a modest understatement.

The framers established our government with checks and balances. But executive orders have accumulated important precedent. The Emancipation Proclamation, by which Lincoln declared an end to slavery in the South, was issued under the "military necessity" of adding blacks to the Union Army, a step without which the North might not have won the Civil War. Franklin Roosevelt's Executive Order #8802 established the Fair Employment Practices Commission. Harry Truman's Executive Order #9981 desegregated the military.

More to the point, FDR's Executive Order #9066 ordered the forcible internment of 100,000 people of Japanese descent into the now infamous concentration camps of World War II.

There is also precedent for a president overriding the Supreme Court. In the 1830s, Chief Justice John Marshall enshrined the right of the Cherokee Nation to sovereignty over its ancestral land in the Appalachian Mountains. But President Andrew Jackson scorned the decision. Some 14,000 native Americans were moved at gunpoint to Oklahoma. More than 3,000 died along the way.

All this will be relevant should Team Bush envision a defeat in the 2008 election and decide to call it off. It's well established that Richard Nixon -- mentor to Karl Rove and d*ck Cheney -- commissioned the Huston Plan, which detailed how to cancel the 1972 election.

Today we must ask: who would stop this administration from taking dictatorial power in the instance of a "national emergency" such as a terror attack at a nuclear power plant or something similar?

Nothing in the behavior of this Congress indicates that it is capable of significant resistance. Impeachment seems beyond it. Nor does it seem Congress would actually remove Bush if it did put him on trial.

Short of that, Bush clearly does not view anything Congress might do as a meaningful impediment. After all, how many divisions does the Congress command?

The Supreme Court, as currently constituted, would almost certainly rubber stamp a Bush coup. If not, like Jackson, he could ignore it as easily as he would ignore Congress.

What does that leave? There is much idle speculation now about what the armed forces would do. We also hear loose talk about "90 million gun owners."

From the public side, the only conceivable counterforce might be a national strike or an effective long-term campaign of general non-cooperation.

But we can certainly a.ssume the mainstream media will give lockstep support to whatever the regime says and does. It's also a given that those likely to lead the resistance will immediately land in those new prisons being built by Halliburton et. al.

So how do we cope with the harsh realities of such a Bush/Cheney/Rove dictatorial coup?

We may have about a year to prepare. Every possible scenario needs to be discussed in excruciating detail.

For only one thing is certain: denial will do nothing.
Harvey Wasserman's "History of the United States" is at , along with "Solartopia! Our Green-Powered Earth, A.D. 2030." The Fitrakis Files are at (where this article was originally published), along with "How the GOP Stole America's 2004 Election & Is Rigging 2008," which Bob and Harvey co-wrote.


SOURCE:
 10 years ago '04        #3
Adam A 19 heat pts19
space
avatar space
space
$4,516 | Props total: 85 85
I certainly hope not, but it is very possible.
 10 years ago '05        #4
justindlawson 2 heat pts
space
avatar space
space
$3,860 | Props total: 0 0
this will not happen. this is absurd.


already been talked about in 2005. he would have to pass an amendment repealing the 22nd amendment. can we get some real news stories please..


ron paul is only an internet phenomenon. thats the truth. but oh well. we shall see soon. then maybe all this anti republican non sense can go away..even tho yall gonna vote for ron paul who is in fact a republican :banghead:
 10 years ago '07        #5
Goosie McNeen 11 heat pts11
space
avatar space
space
$3,756 | Props total: 762 762
*sigh*
pretty convincing,
but that sh*t is ree-diculous

n*ggas juss need ta vote.
 10 years ago '04        #6
djrdubz 
space
space
space
$1,304 | Props total: 0 0
fu*k if they do some sh*t like that expect another revolutionary war
 10 years ago '04        #7
igotgame4ya 
space
avatar space
space
$1,858 | Props total: 19 19
so what if there's an attack around that time, and the country goes into martial law....

couldn't the election be cancelled then as well?
 08-01-2007, 04:01 PM         #8
djmarkuz91  OP
space
space
space
$n/a | Props total:  
Can he really do that? I hear chanting from people outside!
 08-01-2007, 04:03 PM         #9
Mbrew457  OP
space
space
space
$n/a | Props total:  
hahha

SWEEEET SOURCE


that will never happen
 08-01-2007, 04:13 PM         #10
Karl Spackler  OP
space
space
space
$n/a | Props total:  
They tried that sh*t with f*g**t Giuliani as mayor of NY after 9/11. Most people there were scared pussified, they were willing to go along with anything.

The funny thing was that 9/11 was on election day. It was primary day in NYC.

If they decide to drop a nuke on a major city between now and the elections, you bet you a.sses there will be the stupidest people crying for Bush to stay in office. That's all you will see on TV.
 10 years ago '05        #11
justindlawson 2 heat pts
space
avatar space
space
$3,860 | Props total: 0 0
^^ya and if that happens i want him to stay as president. he has all the intelligence and the ability to defend us. not some liberal who doesnt think al qaeda exists.
 08-01-2007, 04:29 PM         #12
khmerraps  OP
space
space
space
$n/a | Props total:  
so this is why, in government class, they kept emphasizing the impact that executive orders can have and how important habeus corpus is. people are in total denial that this will happen. it may and it may not. the fact of the matter is that it IS possible. if it is possible, that means groundwork has already been laid down. and u don't lay down groundwork unless u plan to build on it.
 10 years ago '06        #13
Storchaveli 94 heat pts94
space
avatar space
space
$27,989 | Props total: 4020 4020
 Karl Spackler said:
If they decide to drop a nuke on a major city.
:rolleyes:

 justindlawson said:
^^ya and if that happens i want him to stay as president. he has all the intelligence and the ability to defend us. not some liberal who doesnt think al qaeda exists.
Bi*ch what the fu*k are you smoking?
 10 years ago '04        #14
uncfan888 5 heat pts
space
avatar space
space
$17,711 | Props total: 15 15
i feel dumber for reading this article.

everyone acts like it'll be better with Dems in office....

as Talib Kweli so eloquently put it:
"You go to church to find you some religion
And all you hear is connivin' and gossip and contradiction and
You try to vote and participate in the government
And the muh'fu*kin' Democrats is actin' like Republicans"
 10 years ago '05        #15
justindlawson 2 heat pts
space
avatar space
space
$3,860 | Props total: 0 0
 Storchaveli said:
:rolleyes:



Bi*ch what the fu*k are you smoking?
lol. why would i want a new president who wouldnt know what to do? hillary would send them flowers. and talk fu*k that. bomb those c*nts
 10 years ago '05        #16
justindlawson 2 heat pts
space
avatar space
space
$3,860 | Props total: 0 0
 khmerraps said:
so this is why, in government class, they kept emphasizing the impact that executive orders can have and how important habeus corpus is. people are in total denial that this will happen. it may and it may not. the fact of the matter is that it IS possible. if it is possible, that means groundwork has already been laid down. and u don't lay down groundwork unless u plan to build on it.


anything is possible.... ya like Ron Paul winning hahahahahaha
 10 years ago '04        #17
uncfan888 5 heat pts
space
avatar space
space
$17,711 | Props total: 15 15
 From Da Future said:
nah they will just put Schwarzenegger in as president.
i was elected to lead..not read
 08-01-2007, 04:50 PM         #18
the hater  OP
space
space
space
$n/a | Props total:  
voting for the president really dont matter. fact is that both parties are out to lie to the american people. one vote or 100 votes wont make a difference because its all a scam
 08-01-2007, 04:51 PM         #19
CMONEY  OP
space
space
space
$n/a | Props total:  
 justindlawson said:
^^ya and if that happens i want him to stay as president. he has all the intelligence and the ability to defend us. not some liberal who doesnt think al qaeda exists.
lol...some people just dont understand...al qaeda doesnt exist...our government made it up to scare people into thinking terrorists are a real threat when really bush planned out the whole attack on 9/11, you really think a plane can hit the pentagon but not the white house? if a plane can hit the pentagon a plane can hit anything, but george bush didnt want it to hit the white house cuz he was prolly in there...they want us to be scared of terrorists so they can keep passing rediculous a.ss laws and letting them fly because they supposedly increase security from terrorists...such as bush
s law where anybodies phone can just be tapped (invasion of privacy) under suspicion of terrorism...thats bullsh*t
 08-01-2007, 04:52 PM         #20
iThink  OP
space
space
space
$n/a | Props total:  
 justindlawson said:
^^ya and if that happens i want him to stay as president. he has all the intelligence and the ability to defend us. not some liberal who doesnt think al qaeda exists.
You lost all credibility the minute you decided to type those words in regards to President Bush.
Home      
  
 

 






most viewed right now
 42
Niggas just crucified Lil Kim
113 comments
20 hours ago
@hiphop
most viewed right now
 41
Image(s) inside Jeezy wildin 😩😩😂😂😂
111 comments
21 hours ago
@hiphop
most viewed right now
 39
joie chavis
45 comments
2 days ago
@thotsdimesetc
most viewed right now
 28
Image(s) inside Girl, you look so good, it's to die for (die for) | Ooh, that pus-y go..
21 comments
21 hours ago
@thotsdimesetc
most viewed right now
 19
Video inside Denzel speaking Realism!
30 comments
20 hours ago
@wild'ish
most viewed right now
 18
When Popeyes runs out of chicken
73 comments
20 hours ago
@wild'ish
most viewed right now
 15
50 cent did something to Comedienne Aarona Lopez. She has her friends worried!!!
116 comments
2 days ago
@hiphop
most viewed right now
 11
Image(s) inside Uncle Murda Comments On Chinx's Killer Who Is Linked To Him!
107 comments
20 hours ago
@hiphop
back to top
register contact Follow BX @ Twitter Follow BX @ Facebook search BX privacy