Jan 23 - DeSantis Responds To Backlash From Banning AP AA Studies Course |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
16261 page views 261 comments ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
|
|
1 week ago |
![]() ![]() | |
![]() ![]() |
What I posted previously: There have also already been reviewes carried out in public on the curriculum for this course. If leans heavily on marxist ideology and pushes a socialist agenda. The scholars they planned to study were neo-marxists and ultra radicalists such as Robin D. G. Kelley who was literally a communist. He was a member of the Communist Workers Party. Perhaps if they revamp what will actually be taught in this course then it could stand a chance. But as it stands, it is currently based around a framework that can heavily radicalize young people. The education system should not be used for pushing political agendas on students | |
|
1 week ago |
![]() ![]() | |
![]() ![]() |
read my other comments. the proposed course was gonig to be propoganda based on the teachings of radicalist communist extremists | |
|
1 week ago |
![]() ![]() | |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | |
|
1 week ago |
![]() ![]() | |
![]() ![]() |
Can't front that sounds crazy | |
|
1 week ago |
![]() ![]() | |
![]() ![]() |
i agree - the curriculum taught in regular US history needs to be reconsidered too. that's irrelevant to the discussion and point I tried to raise though. We should be teaching our kids REAL history. The proposed AA studies course relies on scholars that were literal communists and radicalists. | |
|
1 week ago |
![]() ![]() | ||
![]() ![]() |
| ||
|
1 week ago |
![]() ![]() | |
![]() ![]() |
Malcolm was considered a radical to some people but he loved his people and wanted us to excel | |
|
1 week ago |
![]() ![]() | |
![]() ![]() |
![]()
![]() | |
|
1 week ago |
![]() ![]() | |
![]() ![]() |
By that metric, MLK wouldn't be able to be studied because he had socialist leanings. All this sounds like is they only want to talk about the "safe" Black People and ignore a good chunk of history. Nat Turner would be off limits because he was radical in his actions. Malcolm. Baldwin. Etc. Would all be exempt from discussion. Even white people like John Brown would be considered too radical. I know one of the areas of study was Black Feminism. How are you going to study that without the work of bell hooks? Any well rounded curriculum about Black History is going to include all the above and more. You don't have to like or "push" an ideology to discuss it in a classroom setting. A lot of debate about the merits would be had in those classrooms. I think a lot of people complaining about this never went to college. So, they think you always have to agree with the teacher and everyone else in the class. I wrote several papers in school that went against what the teacher was trying to present. I got passing grades because I made a compelling argument which my teacher respected. Truthfully, any criticism towards those ideologies feels hollow when you are so scared of it you don't even want kids to learn about it and make up their own minds. | |
|
1 week ago |
![]() ![]() | |
![]() ![]() |
;t=IyQq-T_f72BwQOEvuv5seg
Undercover BXmember uncle Luke thinks black history shouldn’t be taught in schools and instead should be left up to the parents at home to teach. This can only end well.
;t=IyQq-T_f72BwQOEvuv5seg Last edited by Broseph Stalin; 01-23-2023 at 05:38 PM.. | |
|
1 week ago |
![]() ![]() | |
![]() ![]() |
I wrote pro-socialist essays when i was younger and malcolm x's teachings have been part of me since i was 9 years old. Bx posters seem to get it twisted because my opinions don't always fall in line with the mainstream (don't forget malcolm x warned us about dems). Colleges are well known for pushing specific agendas in the modern day, and this course seems to be tipping the line. Whilst there does seem to be a good amount of useful history included in the curriculum, a lot of the framework and a*signments etc are pushing children to think and act in a certain way. They should reconsider what's being taught in the course, and come back with a curriculum based on facts rather than personal opinions of radical figures. | |
|
1 week ago |
![]() ![]() | |
![]() ![]() |
Here's the curriculum for those of you who actually enjoy forming your opinions based on facts & research - Many good subjects focused around history. The main problem IMO is unit 4 - movements & debates. The vast majority of the content seems to be coming at it from a far left socialist viewpoint. It doesn't seem to even consider conventional liberal views, nevermind conservative views. It's clear that there's a political agenda they've tried to weave into the fabrics of the course | |
|
1 week ago |
![]() ![]() | |
![]() ![]() |
So this is p much par for the course | |
|
1 week ago |
![]() ![]() | |
![]() ![]() |
For example, if the course decides to teach about Malcom X, would that be considered anti American extremism ? | |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() | |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | |
|
|
|