britney griner answers a couple of quick questions |
![]() |
2 months ago |
![]() ![]() |
3955 page views 103 comments ![]() ![]() ![]() |
britney griner answers a couple of quick questions
|
|
2 months ago |
![]() ![]() | |
![]() ![]() |
You traded an arms dealer who has been connected to weapons that have k*lled Americans for a basketball player who decided that smoking weed in fu*king Russia made more sense than listening to US advisories to not travel there ![]() | |
|
2 months ago |
![]() ![]() | |
![]() ![]() |
You also forgot to mention that he was getting released from prison in 6 years anyway and Griner would still be sitting in prison when he got released | |
|
2 months ago |
![]() ![]() | ||
![]() ![]() |
. | ||
|
2 months ago |
![]() ![]() | |
![]() ![]() |
Here is some more for your dumbass to read. That judge doesn't think he is that bad Butttt Butttt the merchant of death. Butttt Butttt They made a movie about him he has to be bad ![]() Last edited by pippen33; 12-08-2022 at 07:49 PM.. | |
|
2 months ago |
![]() ![]() | |
![]() ![]() |
So he's "not that bad" but the judge still thinks the deal is troubling ![]() Which ever way you try to cut it the judge is saying it's a bad deal regardless of how much you wanna try to clean up the dude's image ![]() But but but tell me more about how he's not that bad of a dude ![]() | |
|
2 months ago |
![]() ![]() | |
![]() ![]() |
What part u not understanding champ? "The idea of trading him shouldn't be unacceptable" That means the government should be able to accept it You don't even comprehend basic sh*t And yes it could be "troubling" because it set a precedent but it shouldn't be unacceptable fu*k Last edited by pippen33; 12-08-2022 at 07:56 PM.. | |
|
2 months ago |
![]() ![]() | |
![]() ![]() |
This is literally the point everyone is making. You think there would be as much of a fuss if Bout was dealt for one of the US's spy's or something? Brittney Griner is not someone we should have released him for. I don't understand what you're not processing here. Everyone understands he was being released... but to give up a war criminal for Brittney Griner is not a good move but you're here talking about how he wasn't that bad of a person ![]() Then again this is coming from someone who conveniently either cropped that part out of the screenshot they've been posting on BX. I just don't understand how you're acknowledging it sets a bad precedence.. so you're processing that this is completely lopsided deal yet you're sitting here trying to justify it. It makes no sense. | |
|
2 months ago |
![]() ![]() | |
![]() ![]() |
"Shouldn't be unacceptable" means that the government should be able to accept it You are fu*kin remedial And she didn't even elaborate on why it was " Troubling". She said multiple times that he got fu*ked over and should be released and your dumbass focused in on one word hahaha She thinks he should be released. You are a fu*kin goof How do you know he is a war criminal? The Judge said nothing he did was a crime until The DEA setup a sting operation for him.. And if he is a war criminal then why did the judge say he should be released? Last edited by pippen33; 12-08-2022 at 08:13 PM.. | |
|
2 months ago |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
none of you bums would be let out
![]() |
|
2 months ago |
![]() ![]() | |
![]() ![]() |
Let's think about why a specific 1:1 trade would be troubling. You know what... I'll let you handle that ![]() Like this is just common sense here. You can play stupid... that's on you. If the word "troubling" while discussing trading a celebrity/athlete for an international arms dealer is throwing your brain in a pretzel there's nothing that can be said to you. Also, she didn't say he didn't commit a crime, he didn't commit a crime chargeable in an AMERICAN court... this man was an International arms dealer. This is a fact. ![]() "this arms dealer was being let go anyway" to "This trade can set a bad precedence" to "He didn't even commit a crime" ![]() | |
|
2 months ago |
![]() ![]() | |
![]() ![]() |
Never said that the judge said he didn't commit a crime. She said the crimes he committed didn't warrant a 20 year sentence. Which means she didn't think he was some big war criminal. But u said he is a war criminal so tell us specifically what war crimes he committed You are just making up sh*t fu*kin idiot. | |
|
|
|