BREAKING: Bish Made Trump BEGS Supreme Court To Keep His Tax Returns Hidden

https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1195104154823168000?s=21

New: Trump has asked the Supreme Court to bar his accounting firm from turning over eight years of his tax returns to Manhattan prosecutors.

The case could yield a major ruling on the scope of presidential immunity from criminal investigations. https://t.co/d0RyCWyage

— Kyle Griffin (@kylegriffin1) November 14, 2019

Trump Asks Supreme Court to Bar Release of His Tax Returns

By Adam Liptak Nov. 14, 2019

WASHINGTON — President Trump asked the Supreme Court on Thursday to bar his accounting firm from turning over eight years of his tax returns to Manhattan prosecutors.

The case, the first concerning Mr. Trump’s personal conduct and business dealings to reach the court, could yield a major ruling on the scope of presidential immunity from criminal investigations.

Last week, a unanimous three-judge panel of a federal appeals court in Manhattan ruled against Mr. Trump, rejecting his argument that he was absolutely immune from criminal investigation while he remains in office. The court, in a focused ruling, said state prosecutors may require third parties to turn over a sitting president’s financial records for use in a grand jury investigation.

Mr. Trump has fought vigorously to shield his financial records, and prosecutors in Manhattan have agreed not to seek the tax returns until the case is resolved by the Supreme Court. In exchange, they insisted on a very quick briefing schedule, one that would allow the Supreme Court to announce whether it will hear the case as soon as next month and to issue a decision by June, as the presidential election enters its final stages.

Other cases involving Mr. Trump are also in the pipeline. They involve matters as diverse as demands from House Democrats for tax and business records, a request for access to redacted portions of the report prepared by Robert S. Mueller III, the special counsel, and challenges to Mr. Trump’s business arrangements under the Constitution’s emoluments clauses.

https://twitter.com/genius/status/1193931241533378562?s=21

 https://twitter.com/genius/status/1193931241533378562?s=21

On Wednesday, the full United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit refused to rehear a ruling from a divided three-judge panel that Mr. Trump’s accounting firm must comply with the House Oversight and Reform Committee’s demands for eight years of his financial records. A lawyer for Mr. Trump said he would appeal that ruling to the Supreme Court, too.

The legal f*ght in the New York case began in late August after prosecutors in the office of the Manhattan district attorney, Cyrus R. Vance Jr., a Democrat, subpoenaed Mr. Trump’s accounting firm, Mazars USA, for his tax returns and those of his family business dating to 2011.

The prosecutors are looking into hush-money payments made to two women just before the 2016 presidential election. Mr. Trump and his company, the Trump Organization, reimbursed his former lawyer and fixer, Michael D. Cohen, for payments he made to the adult film actress Stormy Daniels, who claimed she had an affair with Mr. Trump.



Mr. Cohen was also involved in money paid to Karen McDougal, a Playboy model who also said she had a relationship with Mr. Trump. The president has denied the relationships.

Prosecutors say they need the documents to decide whether the payments violated state laws.

Mr. Trump’s lawyers sued to block the subpoena, arguing that criminal investigations of presidents are barred by the Constitution. They said sitting presidents are not only protected from being indicted, a proposition that is widely but not universally accepted, but also cannot be subjected to the burdens of criminal investigations, especially from local prosecutors who may use the criminal process for political gain.

When the case was argued last month before the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Judge Denny Chin asked about a statement Mr. Trump had once made — that he could stand on Fifth Avenue and shoot someone without political fallout.

Judge Chin asked William S. Consovoy, a lawyer for Mr. Trump, about the legal consequences of such a hypothetical crime.

“Local authorities couldn’t investigate?” Judge Chin asked, adding: “Nothing could be done? That’s your position?”

“That is correct,” Mr. Consovoy said. “That is correct.”

In a footnote to last week’s decision, Chief Judge Robert A. Katzmann, writing for the appeals court panel, said allowing a grand jury to inspect tax returns did not seem likely to impose a burden on Mr. Trump’s ability to fulfill his constitutional responsibilities.

“We note that the past six presidents, dating back to President Carter, all voluntarily released their tax returns to the public,” Judge Katzmann wrote. “While we do not place dispositive weight on this fact, it reinforces our conclusion that the disclosure of personal financial information, standing alone, is unlikely to impair the president in performing the duties of his office.”

Judge Katzmann noted that Mr. Trump had conceded that his immunity would last only as long as he held office.

“There is no obvious reason why a state could not begin to investigate a president during his term and, with the information secured during that search, ultimately determine to prosecute him after he leaves office,” he wrote.


 https://www.nytimes.com/2 .. eme-court.html

Why he so scared to show and prove he’s done nothing wrong on all fronts ?

He claims he's the most transparent president but yet he's doing the most to hide his dealings. What is lil Donny afraid of?

Totally normal and not a issue if Obama did this right

Was saying he would before he got elected then been hiding them since, wonder why? He usually loves things that validate or exemplify his wealth, but not the actual paper work that can flaunt it for him? Fake president is also fake billionaire

Most transparent President in history

Audits, he said,
"I would love to release my taxes,..." he said..
some not-stupid folks realized it was bullsh*t back then.. smfh

Sk8bamboo said Why he so scared to show and prove he’s done nothing wrong on all fronts ?

Probably hasn't paid taxes like every billionaire

Johnnytusanmi said Probably hasn't paid taxes like every billionaire

Wrong. They are going to show he’s not even close to being a billionaire after he’s boasted about that his whole damn life

yousabi*ch said Wrong. They are going to show he’s not even close to being a billionaire after he’s boasted about that his whole damn life

His properties alone are worth billions

Johnnytusanmi said His properties alone are worth billions

No they’re not. He makes his money from licensing his name which has been sullied by his unrepentant Fu€kery. But I digress. If your Fat Dear Leader is rich like he says he’d release that Kraken.

kiss0fdeath said No they’re not. He makes his money from licensing his name which has been sullied by his unrepentant Fu€kery. But I digress. If your Fat Dear Leader is rich like he says he’d release that Kraken.

That money is list there also if you can read the article

That's around 80 million

All the world really is a stage, political theater is top of the line drama. Obviously in my mind holding the office of President should not inherently make an individual above prosecution, but I guess the Supreme Court will have to decide that lol. Ethically it is clear to me but Trump has stacked the deck. It would be a rather low point in judicial precedent not to mention absolutely undemocratic to make any citizen just explicitly immune to prosecution. I would like to say it would be supremely unAmerican for whatever that’s worth but u know

view image

kiss0fdeath said No they’re not. He makes his money from licensing his name which has been sullied by his unrepentant Fu€kery. But I digress. If your Fat Dear Leader is rich like he says he’d release that Kraken.

All six New York buildings that held the name of “Trump Place” have decided to remove the President’s name—the final two buildings voted to take down the signs this week.

In a vote of the Manhattan’s Upper West Side condo board at 220 Riverside Blvd., that included 83 percent of the building owners, “74.7 percent voted to remove the signage, and 25.3 percent voted not to remove the signage,” according to an email obtained by the Washington Post.

Earlier in the week, the condo board at 120 Riverside announced they were doing the same. The email went on to say, that although the Trump Organization did an “outstanding job in ensuring the financial and operational well being of the condominium,” they would still go ahead and foot the costs of removing the signs. The price to remove each sign might be as high as $150,000 and $1 million each.

Johnnytusanmi said Probably hasn't paid taxes like every billionaire

The motherfu*ker said this during the debate. On live tv Hilary said he doesn’t pay and he said it’s cause he’s smart!

How has no one brought this up!!!?

Trump the Cowardly Lardass

Tha Boss said The motherfu*ker said this during the debate. On live tv Hilary said he doesn’t pay and he said it’s cause he’s smart!

Yep it's an open secret billionaire dont pay taxes because of loop holes. Even the IRS admitted it's too difficult to audit them.

view image

Johnnytusanmi said Yep it's an open secret billionaire dont pay taxes because of loop holes. Even the IRS admitted it's too difficult to audit them.

What makes u think trump is really a billionaire because he said so. Lol

Big Gurthy said What makes u think trump is really a billionaire because he said so. Lol

Because his properties alone that he purchased in the 80s and are probably trippled their worth for what he purchased them at are worth over a billion.

Tha Boss said The motherfu*ker said this during the debate. On live tv Hilary said he doesn’t pay and he said it’s cause he’s smart!

view tweet

view video

view image

Rich130 said All six New York buildings that held the name of “Trump Place” have decided to remove the President’s name—the final two buildings voted to take down the signs this week. In a vote of the Manhattan’s Upper West Side condo board at 220 Riverside Blvd., that included 83 percent of the building owners, “74.7 percent voted to remove the signage, and 25.3 percent voted not to remove the signage,” according to an email obtained by the Washington Post. Earlier in the week, the condo board at 120 Riverside announced they were doing the same. The email went on to say, that although the Trump Organization did an “outstanding job in ensuring the financial and operational well being of the condominium,” they would still go ahead and foot the costs of removing the signs. The price to remove each sign might be as high as $150,000 and $1 million each.

view image

Taxes will be released later this week. Orange man go down soon. He will be mint peached by the end of the month, mostly everyone in shambles!

view image