Makes sense to me.. JJ won on a few levels here. He could have easily just stayed in a relationship with her for the year and not had to pay anything.. Still did whatever he wanted and had her be his "Girlfriend in name only" at social events... I want to know why would she even agree to such a contract? The contract only benefits JJ
It also says he only has to pay if he terminates the relationship. He could have just had her be his girlfriend and not gave her sh*t financially.. Where does it say he has to give her financial support in the relationship? He could have just been a cheapskate and made her leave him...
Last edited by Nu Tymez; 07-25-2013 at 10:02 AM..