only read a couple parts and im sure the rest is irrelevant so i will comment on those.
first is that when it comes to your comparison im only speaking in generalities...really?
excuse my language but thats not a fu*king generality , that is a specific pinpoint as to why your comparison is stupid. you can agree or not agree, but dont be a dumbass and say thats not specific
as for your comment as to why quoted dudes post when referring to you...well you do know what perks are right? you know the word he used in that quote about the album releasing early...you are familiar right?
perks...exclusivity, you still dont get it? you highlight one word and completely miss the whole point of what he was saying as well as myself
and no, you literally have no idea what you are talking about, but you are type that will continue the back and forth with long winded post filled with BS to prove you do...so go ahead homie and dissert another post, its what you're good at...the content of those post are lacking, but at least we know you can form paragraphs nicely, like and middle school graduate can (congrats on that by the way.)
Nice Job only replying the points you found a way to somehow still wiggle an argument out of. It's okay though cuz I'm use to this with you by now. So let's just finish off the points that you tried to grab onto.
" a market's way to generate revenue isnt the same as the world we are talking about. "
If you think that's specific than my joke about the middle school education thing might have to be taken seriously. How are they different exactly ?? Why dont you specify that ?? and then from there actually demonstrate how those differences directly negate my analogy. THAT would be specific , not saying " Oh they do business differently, that's all I can say" . Both sell hard products for profit and both will use incentives/freebies/services to attract customers who will hopefully buy products. That's the basic gist of the comparison since you seem to not have noticed. Let me just strip down my analogy to the most basic point possible so the "bigger picture" stops confusing you.
" A company giving away something that alot of people are accustomed to getting for free as an incentive to consider another purchase. "
That's basically the concept that they have in common. You tell me exactly how that statement is inaccurate other than " Man the two companies do business differently, they're just different "
Now let's go on to the next dumb comment
" samsung cares more about the exclusive content than actually making a profit because its shown in some cases that one follows the other. "
I'm sorry I didn't fully recognize the sheer stupidity followed by the contradictory explanation in this statement the first time I read it. Samsung cares more about exclusive content than actually making a profit ?? Are you serious ?? Samsung cares about the profit first and foremost and see the content as a way of getting to the profit. Which you admitted and contradicted in the same statement. Samsung doesn't give a shyt about exclusive content that they're paying to obtain if that shyt isn't flipping a decent profit for them. Why the phuck would a company care about exclusive content they paid millions for besides profit ?? The end profit is the whole point of why they're paying to have the content in the first place. You actually think Samsung has any other reason for wanting to pay millions for the content other than hoping it raises their profit margins some how some way ?? That's the whole reason why they're doing it in the first place.
Right, I have no idea what I'm talking about but I seem to be the only one out of the two of us who seems to be able to use deductive reasoning and specifics other than generalities that you seem to be unable to elaborate on.
Once again you're free to pretend to "not read " the parts that you can't respond to and just finish off by saying " They're different, you dont know what you're talking about ".