Ghost Writer said:
Whatever, man. You said they didn't know if anyone else was in there. I posted information that stated that they did know and you came in on some, "Well, they don't know for sure. Just because no one lived there doesn't mean no one was in there".
That seems like a lot to a.ssume. The police did their investigation and determined no one was in the house.
Your basing your argument off the fact that maybe there was a bum hiding in the closet of a vacant, locked cabin in the middle of the woods.
i was hoping you would let this go but you already said something that was inaccurate, so everything else you say comes into question. so lets be clear the LAST thing you did was post "information", apparently all you did was post your "misunderstanding" of reports
and there you go saying someone is "assuming" when you "assumed" they chased him in a house...let it go homie, you're off on this one...try something else