10 Reasons the Moon Landings Could Be a Hoax

most viewed right now
 173
The internet reacts to people getting finessed by the mother of the viral bull..
101 comments
@wild'ish
most viewed right now
 124
Image(s) inside Dec 11 - Government agencies announce plan to sellout the internet
69 comments
@news
most viewed right now
 103
Rappers that have or had AIDS
83 comments
@hiphop
most viewed right now
 82
Video inside Response to Joyner Lucas 'I'm Not Racist'
114 comments
@hiphop

section   (0 bx goons and 1 bystanders) Share this on Twitter   Share this on Facebook
 

Props Slaps
 12-31-2012, 08:06 AM         #101
xeduran  OP
space
space
space
$n/a | Props total:  
Below is NASA's funding before the moon landing. You will see the huge increase in funding prior to the moon landing. That increase in money is how the U.S. improved its space program. Lack of funds will stunt growth of any program.

1958 0.1%
1959 0.2%
1960 0.5%
1961 0.9%
1962 1.18%
1963 2.29%
1964 3.52%
1965 4.31%
1966 4.41%
1967 3.45%
1968 2.65%
1969 2.31% Moon Landing
 5 years ago '05        #102
rawchester 14 heat pts14
space
avatar space
space
$5,391 | Props total: 4454 4454
 xeduran said:
Below is NASA's funding before the moon landing. You will see the huge increase in funding prior to the moon landing. That increase in money is how the U.S. improved its space program. Lack of funds will stunt growth of any program.

1958 0.1%
1959 0.2%
1960 0.5%
1961 0.9%
1962 1.18%
1963 2.29%
1964 3.52%
1965 4.31%
1966 4.41%
1967 3.45%
1968 2.65%
1969 2.31% Moon Landing
No one is denying they poured money into the space program. Doesn't take away the fact that they were behind!
 12-31-2012, 08:10 AM         #103
xeduran  OP
space
space
space
$n/a | Props total:  
 rawchester said:
I can't speak on the radio transmission, I'll have to look into it more. I see that you can't speak on the Van Allen Belts. And yes even if they had a blank check for the space program it doesn't take away the fact that the soviets were ahead of them each step of the way Until miraculously the USA leapfrogs the soviets and is on the moon.

So Russia is the first to send an animal into space and return, first to orbit a man and return, first to Spacewalk. Actually a month before Apollo 11 the USSR had an unmanned probe that was supposed to collects soil samples but it crashed on the moon. They would have been first to do that as well. Next month the USA has Men on the moon
Scientists have already spoken on it. The astronauts were not exposed to significant amounts of radiation due to traveling through it pretty fast. The Soviets did not know if it would cause significant amount of damage or not. Just because you can see a huge amount of light, that does not mean it is going to be harmful to you. How is that proof of anything? Do you even know how radiation works?

Exposure time is very important along with radiation levels. If you go quickly enough through an area that has higher radiation levels, you can very well be safe. It is not like the space craft and space suits did not have any protection.
 12-31-2012, 08:12 AM         #104
xeduran  OP
space
space
space
$n/a | Props total:  
 rawchester said:
No one is denying they poured money into the space program. Doesn't take away the fact that they were behind!
Again why did the Russians not call out the radio transmissions? To look over that is completely ridiculous. If you think the Russians would have let that slide, then you are in complete denial. That fact alone proves the moon landing did occur.

And you pointed to the Russians having superior technology at the time. So the funding proves how the U.S. caught up to the Russians. They increased their spending.
 12-31-2012, 08:19 AM         #105
xeduran  OP
space
space
space
$n/a | Props total:  
Is that good enough proof for the you on the Van Allen belt? It is wikipedia, but the sources are sited below. Or do you ignore scientific evidence?



The Apollo missions marked the first event where humans traveled through the Van Allen belts, which was one of several radiation hazards known by mission planners. The astronauts had low exposure in the Van Allen belts due to the short period of time spent flying through them. The command module's inner structure was an aluminum "sandwich" consisting of a welded aluminium inner skin, a thermally bonded honeycomb core, and a thin aluminium "face sheet". The steel honeycomb core and outer face sheets were thermally bonded to the inner skin.
In fact, the astronauts' overall exposure was dominated by solar particles once outside the earth's magnetic field. The total radiation received by the astronauts varied from mission to mission but was measured to be between 0.16 and 1.14 rads (1.6 and 11.4 mGy), much less than the standard of 5 rem (50 mSv) per year set by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission for people who work with radioactivity.[23]
 5 years ago '07        #106
Damagegadget 492 heat pts492
space
avatar space
space
$35,384 | Props total: 16023 16023
stanley kubrick.....stanley kubrick...redrum....


google moon and shining...pretty interesting to say the least
 12-31-2012, 08:23 AM         #107
xeduran  OP
space
space
space
$n/a | Props total:  
 Scouser said:
thread is pretty deep
my question is - why did they use a sh*tty black and white camera to record the footage
when color tv was already invented?
also where are the stars in the background?
how were they able to leave the moon, if the moon has no centripetal/centrifugal force to push them into and out the surface of the moon, since the moon has no atmosphere?

if someone can answer - greatly appreciated
Black and White cameras because they were easier to make smaller at the time.

Stars have been explained because of the lighting on the moon.

Low gravity means it is very easy to launch into space. Less force required to leave the moon's surface. Gravity is what makes it hard to launch off of the Earth.
 5 years ago '05        #108
rawchester 14 heat pts14
space
avatar space
space
$5,391 | Props total: 4454 4454
 xeduran said:
Is that good enough proof for the you on the Van Allen belt? It is wikipedia, but the sources are sited below. Or do you ignore scientific evidence?



The Apollo missions marked the first event where humans traveled through the Van Allen belts, which was one of several radiation hazards known by mission planners. The astronauts had low exposure in the Van Allen belts due to the short period of time spent flying through them. The command module's inner structure was an aluminum "sandwich" consisting of a welded aluminium inner skin, a thermally bonded honeycomb core, and a thin aluminium "face sheet". The steel honeycomb core and outer face sheets were thermally bonded to the inner skin.
In fact, the astronauts' overall exposure was dominated by solar particles once outside the earth's magnetic field. The total radiation received by the astronauts varied from mission to mission but was measured to be between 0.16 and 1.14 rads (1.6 and 11.4 mGy), much less than the standard of 5 rem (50 mSv) per year set by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission for people who work with radioactivity.[23]
This is akin to the 9/11 commission report saying that the towers fell from Fires The only difference is that real engineers and physicists could actually conclusively debunk that official lie. Unfortunately we don't have impartial independent bodies that could verify or debunk this claim of radiation levels.
 12-31-2012, 08:33 AM         #109
xeduran  OP
space
space
space
$n/a | Props total:  
 rawchester said:
This is akin to the 9/11 commission report saying that the towers fell from Fires The only difference is that real engineers and physicists could actually conclusively debunk that official lie. Unfortunately we don't have impartial independent bodies that could verify or debunk this claim of radiation levels.
Ok buddy. Believe what you want. I am not going to argue with irrational and illogical people. The smart people in this thread know that the moon landing was real.

The simplest question you can ask about whether the moon landing was real or not is:

Where did the radio signals come from?

If the signals came from the moon, then the landing has to be real. Only fools would doubt that conclusion.

The facts show that every news media and country including the U.S.'s well known enemy USSR concluded that the radio signals came from the moon.

So believe whatever you want. The best evidence you can get from the moon landing is the radio signals and you wackos dismiss that fact. Nobody has given evidence to the contrary.

Oh and all credible scientists and engineers believe the moon landing was real and that the Van Allen belt can be passed through just fine.

Seeing as how you are a 9/11 nut, I can already tell you love to believe in conspiracies. Keep your foil hat on.


Last edited by xeduran; 12-31-2012 at 08:35 AM..
 5 years ago '11        #110
KING JAYY 535 heat pts535
space
avatar space
space
$52,263 | Props total: 19971 19971
 xeduran said:
So how come the whole world detected the radio transmissions from the moon? You have the nerve to call other people dumb and you have no idea what you are talking about. You do not even understand the science behind it. You just listen to conspiracy nuts and think it is cool to fall in line with them.

Will some of these conspiracy nuts please give an explanation for the radio signals being detected from the moon? Everybody in the world detected them from the moon. That includes all major countries and some smaller countries. All amateurs with the equipment and news stations. Please conspiracy nuts, why did not one single person say that the radio signals were fake and from Earth?

Oh and at the time, they could detect if the radio signal came from a satellite as well, not to mention that there were a lot less satellites in space back then anyway.
you probably think Osama's henchmen ran planes into the twin towers
 12-31-2012, 08:36 AM         #111
xeduran  OP
space
space
space
$n/a | Props total:  
 DR JAYY said:
you probably think Osama's henchmen ran planes into the twin towers
And you are probably an idiot...correction, you are an idiot.
 5 years ago '11        #112
KING JAYY 535 heat pts535
space
avatar space
space
$52,263 | Props total: 19971 19971
 mcfalcons15 said:
Ignorant people gotta find something to try to make themselves relevant, so they say the moon landing was fake. Then they question the physics of it, when they have never taken a physics course, and could not even pass basic science and math courses, which is why they work at KFC now.

The only reason we went to the moon was to prove our technological dominance to the Russians. We knew there were no resources there, so its not like most people say, that we went there, found nothing, and never went back. We knew it was empty before hand. You can do tests from earth and know that.

It's expensive to go to the moon for no reason at all. If we had a reason, we would. There are talks of building an elevator to the moon, so that we can move resources to build a launchpad from the moon, because it is cheaper to launch spacecraft from the moon (due to low gravity) than from earth.

Some of you guys need to read a book, and do your own research, and stop following the crowd.

Worried about the moon landing when your rent is past due.
the most idiotic post in the thread

we knew there were no resources on the moon? How would they know that? Did they go there before?
 5 years ago '05        #113
rawchester 14 heat pts14
space
avatar space
space
$5,391 | Props total: 4454 4454
 xeduran said:
Ok buddy. Believe what you want. I am not going to argue with irrational and illogical people. The smart people in this thread know that the moon landing was real.

The simplest question you can ask about whether the moon landing was real or not is:

Where did the radio signals come from?

If the signals came from the moon, then the landing has to be real. Only fools would doubt that conclusion.

The facts show that every news media and country including the U.S.'s well known enemy USSR concluded that the radio signals came from the moon.

So believe whatever you want. The best evidence you can get from the moon landing is the radio signals and you wackos dismiss that fact. Nobody has given evidence to the contrary.

Oh and all credible scientists and engineers believe the moon landing was real and that the Van Allen belt can be passed through just fine.

Seeing as how you are a 9/11 nut, I can already tell you love to believe in conspiracies. Keep your foil hat on.
All the media?? This was one of the first time that such an event was completely controlled by government media. They controlled the flow of ALL information.

for calling me a 9/11 nut
 5 years ago '11        #114
KING JAYY 535 heat pts535
space
avatar space
space
$52,263 | Props total: 19971 19971
 rawchester said:
All the media?? This was one of the first time that such an event was completely controlled by government media. They controlled the flow of ALL information.

for calling me a 9/11 nut
That dude needs help

The type to believe everything reported on CNN
 5 years ago '07        #115
Damagegadget 492 heat pts492
space
avatar space
space
$35,384 | Props total: 16023 16023
I know ya'll gonna skip over words..so Ill make it visual






[video - click to view]

 12-31-2012, 08:59 AM         #116
Drone  OP
space
space
space
$n/a | Props total:  
 xeduran said:
Ok buddy. Believe what you want. I am not going to argue with irrational and illogical people. The smart people in this thread know that the moon landing was real.

The simplest question you can ask about whether the moon landing was real or not is:

Where did the radio signals come from?

If the signals came from the moon, then the landing has to be real. Only fools would doubt that conclusion.

The facts show that every news media and country including the U.S.'s well known enemy USSR concluded that the radio signals came from the moon.

So believe whatever you want. The best evidence you can get from the moon landing is the radio signals and you wackos dismiss that fact. Nobody has given evidence to the contrary.

Oh and all credible scientists and engineers believe the moon landing was real and that the Van Allen belt can be passed through just fine.

Seeing as how you are a 9/11 nut, I can already tell you love to believe in conspiracies. Keep your foil hat on.
 12-31-2012, 09:00 AM         #117
xeduran  OP
space
space
space
$n/a | Props total:  
 rawchester said:
All the media?? This was one of the first irst time that such an event was completely controlled by government media. They controlled the flow of ALL information.

for calling me a 9/11 nut
I was not talking about U.S. Media fool. Media around the world. Including the Soviets. You people are hopeless.
 5 years ago '06        #118
Yung Dilla 1478 heat pts1478
space
avatar space
space
$54,867 | Props total: 25630 25630
Why has no other country gone to the moon tho?
 12-31-2012, 09:14 AM         #119
xeduran  OP
space
space
space
$n/a | Props total:  
 Yung Dilla said:
Why has no other country gone to the moon tho?
Cause it costs a lot of money and has no benefit at this point. Mars would be a better idea. Money stopped that mission though.
 5 years ago '04        #120
HHS 1 heat pts
space
avatar space
space
$5,554 | Props total: 93 93
Why the hell are people so insistent on disbelieving this despite every claim made against the possibility of a real landing being repeatedly and easily debunked?
Home      
  
 

 






most viewed right now
 54
Image(s) inside Time Traveler Came From 4127 To Get Away From Child Support
44 comments
1 day ago
@thotsdimesetc
most viewed right now
 43
Elle Duncan got Cari Champion the F outta here!
84 comments
1 day ago
@thotsdimesetc
most viewed right now
 38
Video inside My experience after record deal (warning)
290 comments
1 day ago
@wild'ish
most viewed right now
 18
Image(s) inside I Wanna Fu** U Hard On The Sink, After That, Give U Sumthin 2 Drink
68 comments
1 day ago
@thotsdimesetc
most viewed right now
 15
Eminem's First Week numbers for every album ranked
46 comments
20 hours ago
@hiphop
most viewed right now
 14
Article inside Kodi addon site TVAddons to stop proactively checking for piracy
20 comments
1 day ago
@tech
most viewed right now
 11
Video inside Every retarded thot think they a dime on IG
38 comments
2 days ago
@wild'ish
most viewed right now
 7
50 Cent Says Jay Z Will Fail In Boxing Promotion....and he was right
65 comments
1 day ago
@hiphop
back to top
register contact Follow BX @ Twitter Follow BX @ Facebook search BX privacy