10 Reasons the Moon Landings Could Be a Hoax

most viewed right now
 122
Video inside Breaking News: Everyday Struggle W Joe Budden & Akademiks Won't Be Back..
37 comments
@hiphop
most viewed right now
 72
Article inside Details in Child Sex Complaint Against Rapper 6ix9ine Contradict His ..
240 comments
@hiphop
most viewed right now
 62
audio inside Jeezy - Pressure (Official Album Anticipation/Discussion Thread) 12/15
249 comments
@hiphop
most viewed right now
 54
NBA LeBron James Covered His Mouth While Talking To Lonzo Ball After The Game ..
60 comments
@sports

section   (0 bx goons and 1 bystanders) Share this on Twitter   Share this on Facebook
 

Props Slaps
 12-30-2012, 10:57 AM         #1
15970 pageviews
198 comments


ThatHustle 
space
space
space
$n/a | Props total:  
10 Reasons the Moon Landings Could Be a Hoax
 

 

[pic - click to view]

 10 Reasons the Moon Landings Could Be a Hoax - ThatHustle.com

The theory that the moon landings were hoaxed by the US government to a.ssert their victory in the space race over Russia, is something which has grown in popularity over time.

Recent polls indicate that approximately 20% of Americans believe that the U.S. has never landed on the moon. After the Apollo missions ended in the seventies, why haven’t we ever been back? Only during the term of Richard Nixon did humanity ever land on the moon, and after Watergate most people wouldn’t put it past Tricky d!ck to fake them to put America in good standing in the Cold War.

In this list I have presented some of the proposed evidence to suggest that the moon landings were hoaxes. I tried to include NASA’s explanations to each entry to provide an objective perspective.



10. The Waving Flag

[pic - click to view]

 
[pic - click to view]



Conspiracy theorists have pointed out that when the first moon landing was shown on live television, viewers could clearly see the American flag waving and fluttering as Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin planted it. Photos of the landing also seem to show rippling in a breeze, such as the image above which clearly shows a fold in the flag. The obvious problem here is that there’s no air in the moon’s atmosphere, and therefore no wind to cause the flag to blow.

Countless explanations have been put forward to disprove this phenomenon as anything unusual: NASA claimed that the flag was stored in a thin tube and the rippled effect was caused by it being unfurled before being planted. Other explanations involve the ripples caused by the reaction force of the astronauts touching the aluminum pole, which is shown to shake in the video footage.

9. Lack Of Impact Crater

[pic - click to view]

 
[pic - click to view]



The claim goes as follows: had NASA really landed us on the moon, there would be a blast crater underneath the lunar module to mark its landing. On any video footage or photograph of the landings, no crater is visible, almost as though the module was simply placed there. The surface of the moon is covered in fine lunar dust, and even this doesn’t seem to have been displaced in photographic evidence.

Much like the waving flag theory, however, the lack of an impact crater has a slew of potential explanations. NASA maintains that the module required significantly less thrust in the low-gravity conditions than it would have done on Earth. The surface of the moon itself is solid rock, so a blast crater probably wouldn’t be feasible anyway – in the same way that an aeroplane doesn’t leave a crater when it touches down on a concrete airstrip.

8. Multiple Light Sources

[pic - click to view]

 
[pic - click to view]



On the moon there is only one strong light source: the Sun. So it’s fair to suggest that all shadows should run parallel to one another. But this was not the case during the moon landing: videos and photographs clearly show that shadows fall in different directions. Conspiracy theorists suggest that this must mean multiple light sources are present -suggesting that the landing photos were taken on a film set.

NASA has attempted to blame uneven landscape on the strange shadows, with subtle bumps and hills on the moon’s surface causing the discrepancies. This explanation has been tossed out the window by some theorists; how could hills cause such large angular differences? In the image above the lunar module’s shadow clearly contradicts that of the rocks in the foreground at almost a 45 degree angle.

7. The Van Allen Radiation Belt

[pic - click to view]

 
[pic - click to view]



In order to reach the moon, astronauts had to pass through what is known as the Van Allen radiation belt. The belt is held in place by Earth’s magnetic field and stays perpetually in the same place. The Apollo missions to the moon marked the first ever attempts to transport living humans through the belt. Conspiracy theorists contend that the sheer levels of radiation would have cooked the astronauts en route to the moon, despite the layers of aluminum coating the interior and exterior of the spaceship.

NASA have countered this argument by emphasizing the short amount of time it took the astronauts to traverse the belt – meaning they received only very small doses of radiation.

6. The Unexplained Object

[pic - click to view]

 
[pic - click to view]



After photographs of the moon landings were released, theorists were quick to notice a mysterious object (shown above) in the reflection of an astronaut’s helmet from the Apollo 12 mission. The object appears to be hanging from a rope or wire and has no reason to be there at all, leading some to suggest it is an overhead spotlight typically found in film studios.

The resemblance is questionable, given the poor quality of the photograph, but the mystery remains as to why something is being suspended in mid-air (or rather lack of air) on the moon. The lunar module in other photos appears to have no extension from it that matches the photo, so the object still remains totally unexplained.

5. Slow-Motion Walking and Hidden Cables

[pic - click to view]

 
[pic - click to view]



In order to support claims that the moon landings were shot in a studio, conspiracy theorists had to account for the apparent low-gravity conditions, which must have been mimicked by NASA. It has been suggested that if you take the moon landing footage and increase the speed of the film x2.5, the astronauts appear to be moving in Earth’s gravity. As for the astronaut’s impressive jump height, which would be impossible to perform in Earth’s gravity, hidden cables and wires have been suggested as giving the astronauts some extra height. In some screenshots outlines of alleged hidden cables can be seen (the photograph above supposedly shows a wire, though it is extremely vague).

4. Lack Of Stars

[pic - click to view]

 
[pic - click to view]



One compelling argument for the moon landing hoax is the total lack of stars in any of the photographic/video evidence. There are no clouds on the moon, so stars are perpetually visible and significantly brighter than what we see through the filter of Earth’s atmosphere.

The argument here is that NASA would have found it impossible to map out the exact locations of all stars for the hoax without being rumbled, and therefore left them out – intentionally falling back on an excuse that the quality of the photographs washes them out (an excuse they did actually give).

Some photographs are high-quality, however, and yet still no stars are shown. Certainly eerie, considering you can take pictures of stars from Earth in much lower quality and still see them.

3. The "C" Rock

[pic - click to view]

 
[pic - click to view]



One of the most famous photos from the moon landings shows a rock in the foreground, with what appears to be the letter “C” engraved into it. The letter appears to be almost perfectly symmetrical, meaning it is unlikely to be a natural occurrence. It has been suggested that the rock is simply a prop, with the “C” used as a marker by an alleged film crew. A set designer could have turned the rock the wrong way, accidentally exposing the marking to the camera.

NASA has given conflicting excuses for the letter, on the one hand blaming a photographic developer for adding the letter as a practical joke, while on the other hand saying that it may simply have been a stray hair which got tangled up somewhere in the developing process.



[pic - click to view]

 10 Reasons the Moon Landings Could Be a Hoax - ThatHustle.com

198 comments for "10 Reasons the Moon Landings Could Be a Hoax"

 12-30-2012, 10:58 AM         #2
ThatHustle  OP
space
space
space
$n/a | Props total:  



2. The Layered Cross-Hairs


The cameras used by astronauts during the moon landings had a multitude of cross-hairs to aid with scaling and direction. These are imprinted over the top of all photographs. Some of the images, however, clearly show the cross-hairs behind objects in the scene, implying that photographs may have been edited or doctored after being taken. The photograph shown above is not an isolated occurrence. Many objects are shown to be in front of the cross-hairs, including the American flag in one picture and the lunar rover in another.
Conspiracy theorists have suggested NASA printed the man-made objects over a legitimate photograph of the moon to hoax the landings – although if they really planned on doing this, then why they used cross-hairs in the first place is a mystery.

1. The Duplicate Backdrop



The two photos from the Apollo 15 mission shown above clearly have identical backdrops, despite being officially listed by NASA as having been taken miles apart. One photo even shows the lunar module. When all photographs were taken the module had already landed, so how can it possibly be there for one photo and disappear in another? Well, if you’re a hardcore conspiracy theorist, it may seem viable that NASA simply used the same backdrop when filming different scenes of their moon landing videos.
NASA has suggested that since the moon is much smaller than Earth, horizons can appear significantly closer to the human eye. Despite this, to say that the two hills visible in the photographs are miles apart is incontrovertibly false.

BONUS. The Stanley Kubrick Theoryp


This loose extension of the popular conspiracy theory states that acclaimed film director Stanley Kubrick was approached by the US government to hoax the first three moon landings. There are two main branches of this somewhat implausible theory: one group of believers maintain that Kubrick was approached after he released 2001: A Space Odyssey (released in 1968, one year before the first moon landing), after NASA came to appreciate the stunning realism of the film’s outer-space scenes at that time; another group contends that Kubrick was groomed by the government to film the moon landing long before this, and that 2001: A Space Odyssey was a staged practice run for him.

So what evidence might support such claims? Well: apparently, if you watch The Shining (another Kubrick picture), you can pick up on some alleged messages hidden by Kubrick to subtly inform the world of his part in the conspiracy. The most obvious is the child’s Apollo 11 shirt worn in only one scene. Another supposed gem is the line written on Jack Nicholson’s character’s typewriter: “All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy”, in which the word “all” can be interpreted as A11, or Apollo 11.

If you aren’t convinced yet, Kubrick made the mysterious hotel room in the film number 237. Guess how many miles it is from here to the moon: 238,000. So divide that by a thousand and minus one, and you’ve got one airtight theory right there.

 5 years ago '11        #3
Brolicballer13 1 heat pts
space
avatar space
space
$2,503 | Props total: 1125 1125
Very interesting read
But I still think we landed on the moon
 5 years ago '10        #4
astarisborn 
space
avatar space
space
$804 | Props total: 534 534
 Brolicballer13 said:
Very interesting read
But I still think we landed on the moon
I don't. If we had the technology to do it then, why haven't we been able to do it since?
 5 years ago '10        #5
TheMindOf 21 heat pts21
space
avatar space
space
$27,749 | Props total: 16554 16554
 astarisborn said:
I don't. If we had the technology to do it then, why haven't we been able to do it since?
Basically.

You mean to tell me that we could do it with 1960's technology but have CHOSEN not to do it again, even with all the advances in technology since then?


That whole thing was politically motivated.

The US knew that if the Soviets had figured out a way to get there before us, it would have destroyed the morale of the American people and their excitement about the space program.

The US had to be first by any means necessary, even if it meant faking it.

It's pretty obvious.
 5 years ago '11        #6
Brolicballer13 1 heat pts
space
avatar space
space
$2,503 | Props total: 1125 1125
 astarisborn said:
I don't. If we had the technology to do it then, why haven't we been able to do it since?
My guess is that it costs too much money
And I know that statement doesn't make sense
Because we spend money on more wasteful stuff
 5 years ago '11        #7
Brolicballer13 1 heat pts
space
avatar space
space
$2,503 | Props total: 1125 1125
Also nothing is on the moon to my knowledge
It's not like they got diamonds or gold or any
"Natural resource"
 5 years ago '10        #8
walker2781 6 heat pts
space
avatar space
space
$1,826 | Props total: 4 4
 5 years ago '10        #9
rek0nize 66 heat pts66
space
avatar space
space
$9,238 | Props total: 1285 1285
reaching for the sky with this one
 5 years ago '09        #10
Spiffy 34 heat pts34
space
avatar space
space
$20,051 | Props total: 26 26
lol @ landing on the moon. Bunch of BS the government fed to its people to make it look like they were winning the space race vs the soviets.
 5 years ago '06        #11
RAZAH CUTS 5835 heat pts5835
space
avatar space
space
$54,057 | Props total: 18822 18822
They been hollering these things forever man..
 5 years ago '05        #12
ReppinDaBurghh 55 heat pts55
space
avatar space
space
$53,449 | Props total: 7094 7094
 5 years ago '10        #13
A.Dot789 1053 heat pts1053
space
avatar space
space
$13,942 | Props total: 8040 8040
I think the moon landing was faked aswell.
 5 years ago '12        #14
bkkid92 20 heat pts20
space
avatar space
space
$9,429 | Props total: 4069 4069
Buzz & Neil are the only ones who know for sure
 12-30-2012, 05:32 PM         #15
Cowboys All Day  OP
space
space
space
$n/a | Props total:  
Fake as fu*k
 12-30-2012, 05:33 PM         #17
Cowboys All Day  OP
space
space
space
$n/a | Props total:  
 bkkid92 said:
Buzz & Neil are the only ones who know for sure
Ummm no.... there are plenty of people who were involved in this sh*t who would know whether it was real or fake.
 12-30-2012, 05:34 PM         #18
kevante  OP
space
space
space
$n/a | Props total:  
I think the original landing was faked, but we probably have landed there since
 5 years ago '04        #19
bigdog232 2 heat pts
space
avatar space
space
$4,021 | Props total: 390 390
even though I think we have the tech to go to the moon, I believe that landing was fake b/c I dont think if you were standing on the moon, it would be so open out in space like that... I mean, they showed it like it could have been a street or rode just drifting out in the middle of space or something. Plus it just looks fake... it doesnt even look more real than the scene from the old Superman movie from the 80's when he was f!ghting on the movie.


Last edited by bigdog232; 12-30-2012 at 05:43 PM..
 5 years ago '12        #20
Vrl87 2 heat pts
space
avatar space
space
$2,591 | Props total: 375 375


I believe there is a lot of cover ups in history. This being one of them..
Home      
  
 

 






most viewed right now
 37
Video inside Who is she!!
28 comments
1 day ago
@thotsdimesetc
most viewed right now
 25
Video inside Throwback: Teen Gangbangers On Jenny Jones Show
62 comments
1 day ago
@wild'ish
most viewed right now
 25
Video inside T-Mobile about to save us from Comcast, Time Warner & AT&T
53 comments
1 day ago
@tech
most viewed right now
 19
Image(s) inside Ugly niggas watch ya step
83 comments
1 day ago
@wild'ish
most viewed right now
 10
Article inside Salma Hayek claims Harvey Weinstein threatened 'I will kill you, don'..
149 comments
1 day ago
@movies
most viewed right now
 10
Image(s) inside Learn the difference between a DR. Wife and a "Boxden Simp Thot"!
207 comments
1 day ago
@thotsdimesetc
most viewed right now
 9
Image(s) inside The Backshots would be crazy
29 comments
1 day ago
@thotsdimesetc
most viewed right now
 7
If it bleeds, you can now kill it in Ghost Recon: Wildland’s new free DLC.
35 comments
1 day ago
@games
back to top
register contact Follow BX @ Twitter Follow BX @ Facebook search BX privacy