Jury Finds in Favor of Apple in Apple vs. Samsung Trial, Awards More than $1 Billion in Damages

most viewed right now
 150
audio inside Meek Previews New Song "What Beef".. Mentions Drake
47 comments
@hiphop
most viewed right now
 105
Article inside New photo of Jet Li's physical deterioration is astonishing
79 comments
@wild'ish
most viewed right now
 66
2008-2018: The New Wave Where are they Now?
85 comments
@hiphop
most viewed right now
 59
NBA Lebron James just PUBLICLY ETHERED Stephen Curry CAREER and TOOK HIS SOUL ..
63 comments
@sports

section   (0 bx goons and 1 bystanders) Share this on Twitter   Share this on Facebook
 

Props Slaps
 6 years ago '04        #1
8138 pageviews
152 comments


hockeythug 66 heat pts66
space
avatar space
space
$19,303 | Props total: 848 848
Jury Finds in Favor of Apple in Apple vs. Samsung Trial, Awards More than $1 Billion in Damages
 

 

So far, the jury has found largely favor of Apple in the Apple vs. Samsung trial after three days of deliberations.

On the first claim, regarding the '381 "bounce back" patent, the jury finds Samsung guilty on all counts. Samsung infringed on Apple's patent on a wide variety of products.

On Apple's "pinch and zoom" '915 patent, the jury found that Samsung infringed on all but three products.

For the "double-tap to zoom" '163 patent, the jury found that Samsung infringed on a wide number of products, but not all.

The jury found that Samsung took actions that it knew or should have known were infringing across the '381, '915, and '163 patents on most, though not on all, counts.

For the '677 patent, covering Apple's trade dress registration of the look of the front of the iPhone, the jury found that Samsung did infringe on most devices, but again, not all.

For the D'087 patent, covering Apple's trade dress registration of the look of the back of the iPhone, the jury found that Samsung did infringe on some devices, but not all.

For the '305 patent, covering the trade dress registration of the iPhone's home screen, the jury found that Samsung infringed across most devices.

For the D'889 patent, covering the trade dress registration of the iPad's appearance, the jury found that Samsung's tablets do not infringe -- one of the first victories for Samsung.

On the question of whether Samsung Korea knew or should have known it was inducing US subsidiaries to infringe on the D'677, D'087, D'305 and/or D'889 patents, the jury found in favor of Apple across a wide number of phones and patents, though not on the '889 patent regarding the iPad. These two questions are significant for Apple to receive damages.

On the question of whether Samsung's infringement was willful, the jury again found for Apple on a number of patents and devices.

Finally, the jury ruled that all of Apple's patents are valid.

Regarding trade dress, Apple has proven that its unregistered iPhone 3G trade dress was protectable, and the jury found that a number of Samsung phone models violated Apple's trade dress, though not all of them.

Overall, the jury is finding for Apple on most counts.

Regarding damages, the jury finds that Apple should be awarded $1,051,855,000 in damages for willfully violating Apple's patents and trade dress.

Next up are Samsung's claims against Apple.

The jury has found for Apple regarding its alleged infringement of Samsung's utility patents on every claim, however Apple did not prove they were invalid. The jury did not award Samsung any damages.

Finally, Apple did not prove that Samsung violated antitrust obligations regarding its FRAND patents.

Apple did prove that Samsung is barred from enforcing its '516 and '941 patents.

Samsung has lost on almost every significant count



[pic - click to view]

 Jury Finds in Favor of Apple in Apple vs. Samsung Trial, Awards More than $1 Billion in Damages


Last edited by hockeythug; 08-24-2012 at 05:20 PM..

152 comments for "Jury Finds in Favor of Apple in Apple vs. Samsung Trial, Awards More than $1 Billion in Damages"

 6 years ago '04        #2
hockeythug 66 heat pts66 OP
space
avatar space
space
$19,303 | Props total: 848 848
3:41:39 PM PDT
For each of the following products did Samsung (SEC, SEA, STA) infringe claim 19 of /301 patent

Answer for all devices is YES

On the first claim, regarding the '301 "bounce back" patent, the jury finds Samsung guilty on all counts. Samsung infringed on Apple's patent on a wide variety of products. On Apple's "pinch and zoom" patent, the jury found that Samsung infringed on all but three products.


Last edited by hockeythug; 08-24-2012 at 04:47 PM..
 6 years ago '04        #3
hockeythug 66 heat pts66 OP
space
avatar space
space
$19,303 | Props total: 848 848
They are just going over every charge. This will take a while. Not going well for Samsung though
 6 years ago '06        #4
thugged 55 heat pts55
space
space
space
$2,139 | Props total: 537 537
first 4 counts sounds like the jury agreed that samsung infringed patents if im reading it correctly





^^thats live
 6 years ago '06        #5
thugged 55 heat pts55
space
space
space
$2,139 | Props total: 537 537
damn...not going well for samsung
 6 years ago '04        #6
hockeythug 66 heat pts66 OP
space
avatar space
space
$19,303 | Props total: 848 848
On Apple's "pinch and zoom" '915 patent, the jury found that Samsung infringed on all but three products.

For the "double-tap to zoom" '163 patent, the jury found that Samsung infringed on a wide number of products, but not all.

The jury found that Samsung took actions that it knew or should have known were infringing across the '381, '915, and '163 patents on most, though not on all, counts.

For the '677 patent, covering Apple's trade dress registration of the look of the front of the iPhone, the jury found that Samsung did infringe on most devices, but again, not all.

For the D'087 patent, covering Apple's trade dress registration of the look of the back of the iPhone, the jury found that Samsung did infringe on some devices, but not all.


Last edited by hockeythug; 08-24-2012 at 04:53 PM..
 6 years ago '11        #7
PTC 138 heat pts138
space
space
space
$9,068 | Props total: 1554 1554
Keep coke in coffee, keep money smellin mothy
Change is cool to cop but more important is lawyer fees

 6 years ago '04        #8
hockeythug 66 heat pts66 OP
space
avatar space
space
$19,303 | Props total: 848 848
For the D'889 patent, covering the trade dress registration of the iPad's appearance, the jury found that Samsung's tablets do not infringe -- one of the first victories for Samsung.
nice win for Samsung
 6 years ago '11        #9
PTC 138 heat pts138
space
space
space
$9,068 | Props total: 1554 1554
700 fu*king questions... are they going over all 700?
 6 years ago '04        #10
hockeythug 66 heat pts66 OP
space
avatar space
space
$19,303 | Props total: 848 848
On the question of whether Samsung Korea knew or should have known it was inducing US subsidiaries to infringe on the D'677, D'087, D'305 and/or D'889 patents, the jury found in favor of Apple across a wide number of phones and patents. This is significant for Apple to receive damages.
.......
 6 years ago '12        #11
SHADOW 327 heat pts327
space
avatar space
space
$8,679 | Props total: 464 464
first page...
 6 years ago '11        #12
PTC 138 heat pts138
space
space
space
$9,068 | Props total: 1554 1554
SEA - Samsung Electronics America
STA - Samsung Telecommunications America
SEC - Samsung Electronics Company
 6 years ago '04        #13
hockeythug 66 heat pts66 OP
space
avatar space
space
$19,303 | Props total: 848 848
 PTC said:
700 fu*king questions... are they going over all 700?
I think so. I am done posting updates. This sh*t might go on all night.
 6 years ago '04        #14
hockeythug 66 heat pts66 OP
space
avatar space
space
$19,303 | Props total: 848 848
Leo has a lawyer on his show and she is explaning every thing pretty well. Video stream


 6 years ago '10        #15
purpleaxxe 114 heat pts114
space
avatar space
space
$1,275 | Props total: 112 112



[pic - click to view]

 6 years ago '11        #16
PTC 138 heat pts138
space
space
space
$9,068 | Props total: 1554 1554
33 questions... they're on 19.
 6 years ago '04        #17
hockeythug 66 heat pts66 OP
space
avatar space
space
$19,303 | Props total: 848 848
Ok, only 33 questions.
 6 years ago '04        #18
hockeythug 66 heat pts66 OP
space
avatar space
space
$19,303 | Props total: 848 848
 6 years ago '11        #19
PTC 138 heat pts138
space
space
space
$9,068 | Props total: 1554 1554
Damages

1 billion, 51 million 855 thousand dollars
 6 years ago '04        #20
fat_boyy21 329 heat pts329
space
avatar space
space
$9,814 | Props total: 3505 3505
as long as samsung delivers another nexus phone I dont care what happens with this ... cant believe they gave apple the pinch to zoom victory even though it was shown the invention existed years before
Home      
  
 

 






most viewed right now
 39
Video inside Russians catching up on the the Culture too now, Jheeeeeeeze!!
66 comments
1 day ago
@thotsdimesetc
most viewed right now
 30
Ms Vicky gives my blicky a stiffy with them titties
60 comments
1 day ago
@thotsdimesetc
most viewed right now
 28
Video inside I’ll take “things a brotha wouldn’t do” for $200 Alex
154 comments
1 day ago
@wild'ish
most viewed right now
 12
Video inside Slut Amber Rose meets the Slut Maker
61 comments
2 days ago
@thotsdimesetc
most viewed right now
 11
May 20 - Europeans Clown US Gun Violence & The NRA - #MAGA
132 comments
1 day ago
@news
most viewed right now
 11
Video inside This was by far the best catfish
118 comments
1 day ago
@wild'ish
most viewed right now
 10
Image(s) inside Arab girls are leveling up too(got a booty and curves)
74 comments
1 day ago
@thotsdimesetc
most viewed right now
 7
Call Of Duty Black Ops IIII Gameplay
98 comments
2 days ago
@games
back to top
register contact Follow BX @ Twitter Follow BX @ Facebook search BX privacy