1. I am referring to KO percentages. Your logic states that percentages dictate how great someone is in the respective statistical category. KO% is a statistical category; disregarding the variables, Freitas & Klitschko would be viewed as the most prolific punchers in Boxing history...based on your logic.
2. If you expect me to believe that Manny has thrown more punches in a f!ght than Paul Williams & Juan Diaz...you're gonna have to prove that one. I'm not saying that you're wrong...but that is a helluva stretch.
UPDATE: You said "punches landed".
Volume is punches thrown.
1. So you're talking about % of knockouts out of total f!ghts then, okay, Prolific ? that's an extremely subjective term so I have no idea why you would use it. Would I call those two that ? absolutely not, like I said before offense in boxing is different from defense , it comes alot more naturally and easier to f!ghters, just look at the numbers. Many boxers have a resume full of knockouts and fewer have a resume full of impressive kockouts on other elite f!ghters. How many boxers do you know have a record of dropping a f!ghter's accuracy as drastically as Mayweather?? There's not many out there that can drop a f!ghter's accuracy so consistently to as low as 10% at times. Then of course you always have to look at the opponent's record, how many times have Klitschko or Freitas knocked out opponents been knocked out or lost other f!ghts and then how many of Mayweather opponents have had their accuracy and efficiency dropped that drastically ??? In this particular comparison, it's about rarity, and because there's such a discrepancy in boxing between executing great offense and great defense like I stated previously you have to look at this way. Are those other two knocking out a bunch of ppl that have barely been knocked out?? Now is Mayweather consistently dropping punch % of his opponents to rates they've never missed at before ?? Okay
2. Did you either ignore or were unable to comprehend what I typed ? I never said Manny "throws" more punches. I even said multiple times in my previous post that he THROWS less. Does that mean that he still doesn't throw alot more punchers than the average f!ghter? No, does that mean that mean he isn't a volume puncher ? No, Anyone who watches a Manny Pacquiao f!ght knows he punches ALOT more than the average f!ghter, the vast majority of people on here will tell you he's a volume puncher, and they call him the "punches in bunches" f!ghter, when you ask why Pactards believe he can crack Mayweather's defense they all say " he throws too many punches to dodge all of them, you can't dodge a 5-6 punch combo coming every 5 seconds ". Why do you think his stamina gets praised so much?? Nobody praises the stamina of a f!ghter who's punch output is nothing special. Volume is punches thrown but in order to land punches you have to throw them, kinda crazy logic huh ?? So if manny holds records for the highest landed punches in a f!ght that would mean he would have to throw alot too right ?? In those other guy's case , what's the point of throwing all those punches if you're missing a large portion of them ?? they're wasting energy which drains the power and impact of the punches that do hit. So they use stamina to make-up for such horrible accuracy. What's the point of being a volume puncher if alot of your punches dont even connect? Manny doesn't throw more but he lands more meaning his "volume" is actually alot more effective and isn't wasted on air, He holds records for most punches landed ahead of these guys and he's somehow NOT a volume puncher ??