Your only elaboration was resources, which i further went into in a brevity way by saying that it is false, the reason is the absent of the male figure. You can't have a women play both sides of the dominate and feminine role. If anything the brainwashing of society is on the gays side with the propaganda machine. Wait until the gays possibly lose their run and we'll see how beneficial their children grow up.
no i didnt just JUST say its resources. and no, YOU are wrong. how dare you say black ppl s problems after all we have to put up with, boils down to single parent households. that sh*t isnt even debatable really. and are you fu*kin sh*tting me dude? you telling me that s3xist brainwashing is less prevalent than this "gay propaganda machine" you speak of? the hell you talking about about man. women get treated like sh*t and media, magazines, religion, cultural practices reinforce that sh*t, which makes it harder for women to raise children at times.
furthermore, it doesnt have to be a "dominant and feminine role" when raising a child. values on humanity are not gender specific, nor should they be made to be and thus a woman can, and normally do, raise a child effectively without a male figure given the right amount of resources. sh*t dude, for much of this countries history, before the times we speak of now, the middle class household was practically run by the female, because many of those women were housewives while their husbands would be at work. child rearing was practically all female with male providing income. in fact this caused a lot of discontent in the middle class in the 50's and 60's and such. what you are saying is limited and no you havent explained at all how and why a male figure is needed and you damn sure havent linked that effectively to how that can and should stop homos3xuality. you are making a dry claim, again, with no evidence. and the burden is on you, because you are in support of the idea it seems that being gay is wrong and unnatural as the as*hole who said it suggests