at some of these casual basketball fans.. watching youtube videos and reading wikipedia to learn about these players.. it's obvious some of y'all ain't watch these two dudes play..
again.. playoff performances..
VC - 4 times out the 1st round
T-Mac - 0 times out the 1st round
who has the better career fg% and 3pt% despite some of y'all dumb a.ss fools saying t-mac the better scorer, shooter etc??
VC - .445% fg .375% 3pt
T-Mac - .435% fg .337% 3pt
After 02-03 T-mac was no where close to VC.. VC came in and was a superstar from 99' right through to 06-07 when he was with the Nets.. T-Mac barely had a prime.. two high scoring seasons, getting his team no where in the playoffs..
VC is the overall better player and better player in their primes compared.. T-Mac scored more in his prime but he obviously doesn't have anything else on Vince.. he scored 30+ ppg and that's all people see.. VC could have done that too but it doesn't get you anywhere being a selfless player, which is why both haven't attained a ring yet..
I see you like numbers alot
I watch games not stats and Tmac was a better passer, defender and scorer than vince. Besides Kevin Garnett in his Twolve days,barkley and grant hill, hes one of the few players ive seen in my life that werent actual point guards that brought the ball up the court, initiated the offense, set other players up for buckets or got buckets himself and then went down the floor and checked the oppositions sf or pf (he usually was on dirk during their playoff battles).
Vince was/is a scorer and has had a few clutch moments. Their both subpar leaders so throw that out the window. The playoff victories are suspect as well outside of the formentioned ECF battle against Iverson. He was playing with a championship contender level team when he first got to Newjersey in a week conference and orlando with a team that went to finals a year before.