Jun 6 - Man Receives Oral $ex, Ordered to Pay Child Support

most viewed right now
 127
Image(s) inside well damn Young Ma looking more swole than 95% of you niggas
42 comments
@hiphop
most viewed right now
 123
NBA We can all write the ending to this story, he's gone
20 comments
@sports
most viewed right now
 90
Pusha T Song leak snippet and Kanye verse
34 comments
@hiphop
most viewed right now
 64
Image(s) inside A Nice Palmed Sized Moroccan Ass
52 comments
@thotsdimesetc

section   (0 bx goons and 1 bystanders) Share this on Twitter   Share this on Facebook
 

Props Slaps
 7 years ago '04        #1
8209 pageviews
86 comments


DIGI 116 heat pts116
space
avatar space
space
$9,251 | Props total: 729 729
Jun 6 - Man Receives Oral $ex, Ordered to Pay Child Support
 

 
So, a man sued his ex-girlfriend for fraud and emotional distress after she secured a court order demanding he pay child support for their two year-old daughter. The reason? This woman saved his semen after performing oral s3x and secretly impregnated herself. No, this is not a new plotline of absurd television show One Tree Hill but actual events that formed the basis of a 2005 legal battle in Illinois.

Although this case is six years old and garnered some media attention at the time, we recently came across it on Professor Jonathan Turley’s blog and couldn’t resist an opportunity to discuss it.

But before we get to the legal issues presented in this case, namely how a man can be ordered to support a child when his sperm was used without his knowledge, the soap opera-esque facts surrounding this situation deserve to be explained in greater detail.* Trust us.

It all began when Dr. Sharon Irons (an internist) and Dr. Richard Phillips (a family practitioner) began dating in January 1999. Dr. Irons led Dr. Phillips to believe she was divorced and within a few months, they became engaged. According to Dr. Phillips, the two discussed the possibility of having children and he made clear his intentions: that he did not want children until after they were married and any pre-marital s3x would require the use of condoms. Throughout the course of their relationship, they engaged in only three instances of oral s3x: they never went “all the way.”

On one of these intimate occasions, Dr. Irons did something rather remarkable: After fellating Dr. Phillips, she held his semen in her mouth (where it was suitable to sustain viability) and then inseminated herself with it. She did not inform Dr. Phillips of her actions.

Dr. Irons also never informed her boyfriend that she was, in fact, still married. Five months into their relationship, she confessed to Dr. Phillips that she was not divorced and he decided to end their relationship.

Fast-forward to November 2000, when, surprise! Dr. Irons slapped her surely stunned ex-boyfriend with court papers to establish paternity and child support for “their” daughter.

To quote Justice Scalia in 1989’s Michael H. majority opinion (a paternity case also dealing with convoluted family relations, although not as entertaining as here), “The facts of the case are, we must hope, extraordinary.”

Extraordinary they are, indeed. And while Dr. Irons’ act of stashing semen away definitely made for attention-grabbing headlines, the media focused more on the s3xy- slash-crazy angle and less on the actual law. We decided to explore the legal claims advanced by the parties and the reasoning behind Dr. Phillips seemingly unjust obligation to support a child whose existence was beyond the realm of expectation.

In his suit, Dr. Phillips alleged the unauthorized use of his semen constituted actionable claims of fraudulent misconception, conversion and intentional infliction of emotional distress. A lower court dismissed these grievances, and he appealed.

The Appellate Court of Illinois found that a fraudulent misconception claim was only available for “economic” wrongs, and so dismissed this claim. (Dr. Phillips was suing for physical and emotional harms he alleged that he’d suffered as a result of Dr. Irons’ actions).

The court next turned its attention to the conversion claim. Conversion is “an unauthorized act that deprives a person of his property permanently or for an indefinite period of time.” The arguments on both sides of the conversion claim are worth noting.

Dr. Phillips argued that his ex-fiancé took his property, his sperm, without his permission to conceive a child. Dr. Irons countered by a.sserting the sperm was a gift: Dr. Phillips delivered it to her with the intention that she keep it because if he really wanted to retain his semen, he would have put on a condom and “kept its contents”.

The court agreed with Dr. Irons: Dr. Phillips cannot claim he was deprived of his property because he did not intend that the semen be returned.

Finally, the court considered Dr. Phillips’ claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED). To bring an IIED claim, the plaintiff must prove that 1) the conduct was “truly extreme and outrageous”; 2) the defendant had to intend, or be aware that, her conduct would cause severe emotional distress; and 3) the conduct did actually cause severe emotional distress.

The court stated that Dr. Irons’ conduct in deceitfully engaging in oral s3x to procure the sperm necessary to impregnate herself would, according to any reasonable person, be considered “extreme and outrageous” conduct (Ed. Note: well, duh).* Considering the nature of Dr. Irons’ actions and Dr. Phillips’ clear expression of not wanting a child out of wedlock, the second element of IIED was met. For the actual distress, Dr. Phillips claimed a whole slew of anguish including nausea, loss of appetite, interference with his profession, insomnia and more, which was enough to keep the case alive.

The final decision or current status of the case is unavailable which means that the case is still being litigated or the parties settled.

Regardless, what confused us most about the case was that the child support obligation on behalf of Dr. Phillips was not contested. How could a father be forced to pay child support if the conception of the child was beyond (way, way beyond) a reasonable person’s expectation?* The court itself stated that the mother’s actions were “extreme and outrageous”, after all.

The answer? Public policy. In a note for the Drake University Law Review, A Man’s Right to Choose: Searching for Remedies in the Face of Unplanned Fatherhood, author Adrienne D. Gross explained the general policy in law of looking out for a child’s best interest in both child support and paternity statutes. Undisputedly, a child’s best interest is to have the financial support of both biological parents, regardless of their marital status, and according to Ms. Gross, “the child should not suffer from a parent’s indiscretion concerning the events leading to conception.”

Basically, if you father a child and the paternity is established, you are on the hook for child support payments. (A father can sue for IIED, if the mother’s actions in the conception meet the requisite level of crazy, but there is no guarantee he will win.)

A 1983 paternity case sheds some light on how New York courts balance the best interest of the child with a father’s dealing with an unwanted pregnancy and child support obligations in unorthodox situations. The father, established by paternity tests, had been a.ssured that the mother was on birth control.* He alleged fraudulent misrepresentation and argued that he should not be responsible for child support. The court disagreed, and held that fraud and deceit have no bearing on determining child support obligations.

The court explained that the “primary purpose” of New York’s paternity statutes “is to ensure that adequate provision will be made for the child’s needs” and does not allow for the “consideration of the ‘fault’ or wrongful conduct of one of the parents in causing the child’s conception.” If the father really did not want to have a child, despite the woman’s a.ssurance that she was on birth control, he should have used a condom during s3x.

Decisions like this seem to signal, rather unfairly, we think, that a man can be held legally and financially responsible for any unilateral actions his partner takes to conceive a child, no matter how absurd or unforeseeable those actions are.

And Dr. Phillips seems to have been treated particularly unfairly. He didn’t even have intercourse which is the one and only act that, outside of fertility clinics, can foster a reasonable expectation of conceiving a child.* In fact, without intercourse (and outside of fertility clinics) creating a life is, simply, impossible.* There was no way, short of checking what his partner did with his semen after oral s3x (do you know anyone who does that?) that he could have known that he could possibly father a child.

But the courts don’t care about how the egg was actually fertilized: because at the end of the day, there’s a child now involved.* And the concern, from a legal perspective, is whether or not the child will be adequately cared for, regardless of its conception.

Lesson to be learned: If you don’t want any babies, use protection – and make sure your partner isn’t hiding a test tube under the pillow.


[pic - click to view]

 http://mensnewsdaily.com/ .. child-support/

86 comments for "Jun 6 - Man Receives Oral $ex, Ordered to Pay Child Support"

 7 years ago '04        #2
Skilllz 1 heat pts
space
avatar space
space
$7,686 | Props total: 2469 2469
Damn, super grimey. Wow, gotta be careful when fu*king with these ho's, mane.
 7 years ago '07        #3
Damagegadget 493 heat pts493
space
avatar space
space
$36,946 | Props total: 19903 19903
scandalous
 7 years ago '05        #4
Chuck_Remixed 288 heat pts288
space
avatar space
space
$17,550 | Props total: 4802 4802
And they wonder why some men go nuts and off bi*ch.


Last edited by Chuck_Remixed; 06-06-2011 at 09:00 AM..
 7 years ago '05        #5
Super-C 25 heat pts25
space
avatar space
space
$2,437 | Props total: 1 1


this is just


 7 years ago '04        #6
chirpflare 175 heat pts175
space
avatar space
space
$4,030 | Props total: 108 108
 Laduerb22 said:
So nuttin in their mouth doesn't cut it anymore huh? We actually have to check to make sure they swallow from now on.



 7 years ago '06        #7
504survivor 
space
avatar space
space
$1,205 | Props total: 37 37
 Laduerb22 said:
So nuttin in their mouth doesn't cut it anymore huh? We actually have to check to make sure they swallow from now on.
:laugh5:
 7 years ago '11        #8
Kid Zhaine 
space
avatar space
space
$132 | Props total: 0 0
:ahh: i propped most of yall lol,
 7 years ago '04        #9
liveson777 5 heat pts
space
avatar space
space
$3,585 | Props total: 366 366
No freakn way no way no way no way no way ........ No way....no way... Keep goin with the no ways.............................................. .....no way .... Heard it but damn no wayyyyyyyyyyyy
 06-06-2011, 09:44 AM         #10
Dedface 
space
space
space
$n/a | Props total:  
She use a turkey baster?
 7 years ago '05        #11
MysticKJ 28 heat pts28
space
avatar space
space
$15,766 | Props total: 5503 5503
 7 years ago '04        #12
realkilla3 
space
avatar space
space
$3,507 | Props total: 3314 3314
Thats why I bust on faces
 7 years ago '06        #13
BlackandGifted 17 heat pts17
space
avatar space
space
$24,467 | Props total: 836 836
 realkilla3 said:
Thats why I bust on faces
 7 years ago '09        #14
Msfourfteleven 23 heat pts23
space
avatar space
space
$6,878 | Props total: 827 827
That kinda sh*t calls for an a.ss beating within an inch of her life...
 7 years ago '05        #15
landlord151515 138 heat pts138
space
avatar space
space
$2,671 | Props total: 2849 2849
Looks like you need to have a bi*ch say ahhh before and after Brains these days
 7 years ago '07        #16
MythMade 6 heat pts
space
avatar space
space
$9,728 | Props total: 5 5
Lesson learned here: always punch that bi*ch in the throat after cause she will do one of two things

A) spit it out




or B) swallow it like the Good Lord intended
 7 years ago '08        #17
JRisgr8! 2 heat pts
space
avatar space
space
$2,718 | Props total: 497 497
she deserves a fully charged dragon punch to her ovaries
 7 years ago '10        #18
J AL7 1 heat pts
space
avatar space
space
$2,793 | Props total: 188 188
WOW, now thats straight maddness!
 7 years ago '06        #19
johnny 2 heat pts
space
avatar space
space
$3,180 | Props total: 341 341

[pic - click to view]

 7 years ago '06        #20
sunsetnVine 21 heat pts21
space
space
space
$9,274 | Props total: 4770 4770
And this my friends is why you never A) date at work. B) Give your last name. C) Give jumpoffs your real phone number aka keep a burner phone on hand D) Take em to ya crib E) Trust hoes


Granted he wanted to marry the broad.. but still.... after it went left.. cut all contact and get a new burner phone. he still woulda got hemmed up tho.. .he shat to close to home to run from this L.

... shoulda made her swalla that shyt.. dumb a.ss aint find it funny that she kept it in her mouth and left the room... prolly flushed the toilet all late too lMAO.
Home         
  
 

 






most viewed right now
 48
ashley graham killing it i'm sold yo!
77 comments
1 day ago
@thotsdimesetc
most viewed right now
 28
Image(s) inside Rosey Got Thickkkkkk
63 comments
1 day ago
@thotsdimesetc
most viewed right now
 23
Video inside F*ucking Black Guy
142 comments
24 hours ago
@wild'ish
most viewed right now
 19
Image(s) inside May 22 - Here’s how money is destroying the world and the people livin..
46 comments
23 hours ago
@news
most viewed right now
 18
Video inside Steph unveils the new Curry V Low, Finally a good looking Curry shoe?
42 comments
1 day ago
@gear
most viewed right now
 15
Donald Glover Backs Lando's Sexuality: 'How Can You Not Be Pansexual in Space?'
114 comments
1 day ago
@movies
most viewed right now
 12
Image(s) inside Fresh Prince Of Bel Air Mansion 2018
75 comments
1 day ago
@movies
most viewed right now
 6
Image(s) inside New Shazam Poster!!?
43 comments
1 day ago
@movies
back to top
register contact Follow BX @ Twitter Follow BX @ Facebook search BX privacy