beast mode said:
oh and as too brooks,you bums don't NEED brooks,a small low percentage bulk scorer who plays no defense and is not the passer that felton is. of course if you're just given him for nothing then yes but the topic was the knicks giving up felton in a 3 team package for him which NO the knicks don't need. now continue getting son'd pus*y
the trade had NOTHING to do with giving up felton idiot...we were trying to get brooks as a BACK UP PG ..which is what we've been looking for all season due to the heavy minutes felton has to log...DUE to the fact that toney douglas is a poor point guard,and would be better off at the 2...
and aaron brooks is averaging 12,and 4 in 24 minutes a game this year...and was averaging 19,and 5 last year in 35 a game...shooting 39 from the 3....and he can run the offense due his quickness,and ability to shoot....he would be ideal for us right now....
you're the same twit that doesn't know about AVERAGES..and called amar'e stoudemire soft....f**k outta here kid...go sit in the corner..