Hold That said:
This had nothing to do with situation, I'm basing my opinions on skill set.. Even at Duke he would still have a greater impact.. better scorer, better shooter, has an NBA ready body, can drive to the paint and also plays solid defense... Kyrie is the better passer but it's not like Irvings court vision is on the levels that we havent seen before..
I know how you are and extremely bias when anyone chooses another player over a beloved Duke player.. Relax calm down, and stop acting like if someone doesn't choose a Duke player, they are automatically calling that Duke player "garbage"
so all the scouts got it wrong rating Irving the better PG and better pro prospect?!
I was always high on Knight, been bigging up knight on this board since he was a 10th grader... Knight is not better than Irving right now at all. Irving is a much more complete PG.
Knight guns and has a bad shot selection. And if he's not on he hurts his team.
On Irving's off days he STILL makes players around him better and he doesn't keep gunning and hurt his team.
There's a reason why Duke STOPPED recruiting Knight who they had a good relationship with for years for Kyrie Irving.
If you think Knight and Irving were in swapped positions and u think Knight would have a bigger impact than Kyrie at UK... YOU ARE A TARD!
BTW, who wasn't relaxed and who said (or even hinted at) u calling kyrie garbage? U're just talking to be cool. stfu n*gga.