Cant wait

Im drafting 5th...i hate being in the middle...hoping foster drops to me. Already know first 2 picks are peterson vick and the guy picking 3rd is new so hopefully won't grab him....that leaves one guy in front of me and he took brees early last year so hoping he takes a qb again

Who cares who falls to you? At 5 your going to end up with either Charles/424/Foster. That person picking Vick is doing you a huge fu*king favor

-BigC- said: Who cares who falls to you? At 5 your going to end up with either Charles/424/Foster. That person picking Vick is doing you a huge fu*king favor

what kind of logic is that? u can say that about practically the entire first round. If I had 2nd pick id take foster so def want him at 5. Was the best rb in football last year injured...

Its a tier break thats why it matters. There is a clear tier break after AP/424/Foster/Charles as long as you get one your golden. You can have your preference but there is no reason to be mad about getting any of them...

In all honesty the tier break is ap/foster in this years draft...cj got most of his points in garbage time and until chiefs show me thomas jones aint going to be splitting carries im not taking him over foster or ap

Basically if u got first pick its between foster and ap for most (ap gets the nod because u know hes consistent and foster only started 1 year) but basically ap/foster is how ap/cj was last season so if I got a chance at a number 1 caliber player at 5 im going to be stressin hoping he falls to me

KC head coach has already talked about getting Charles more touches this year. 424 in garbage time will still be a top back. The only 100% lock is AP Foster has questions as well since hes the definition of a 1 year wonder...

-BigC- said: KC head coach has already talked about getting Charles more touches this year. 424 in garbage time will still be a top back. The only 100% lock is AP Foster has questions as well since hes the definition of a 1 year wonder...

Well if u consider foster a 1 year wonder thats where our disagreement is...i drafted him last year after watching him beast at the end of the season tge previous year and continue in pre season


On cbs its a clear tier break with ap/foster and will only continue to have larger gap as more drafts happen

Average draft spot is...

1. Ap
2. Foster

With average position taken at...

1. Ap 2.78
2. Foster 3.06
3. Cj 4.33
4. Charles 5.72

Ap got foster by .28 then cj is 1.27 behind foster and charles 2.66 behind foster


Its obvious top 2 spots everyone is taking ap/foster and cj/charles are a tier behind them (especially charles)

Especially Charles

I don't even need to argue for Charles considering what he has done so I will just stop

-BigC- said: Especially Charles I don't even need to argue for Charles considering what he has done so I will just stop

"especially charles" is not an opinion...it was based off factual numbers of average draft position so far this year...

ap is .28 higher then foster....that is same tier. Cj is 1.27 there is an obvious gap....and charles is 2.66 back which really isn't close.

Again these are facts not my opinion....ur saying charles is on same tier going into draft (not saying he can't perform better..u never know) but nobody in their right mind would draft charles #1 overall......and foster/ap are basically a toss up for #1 in most leagues

Maybe you have a different definition of a tier break? The majority of people I know use tiers to break up groups of players where you can draft based off of value. Say you draft at 5 and your top tier of RBs have 4 players, you would then probably not want to draft a RB to maximize your pick value.

hey guys i didn't realize football was back

whats poppin my fantasy fam!!!!!!!!!!

lets all cash this year

i see you Ill

not too sure ill be joing a league this year because i havent been able to find a competitive one

Not doing this anymore?

philly337 said: Not doing this anymore?

word we need to get this thread back going.

what yall think about Steve Smith's resurgence ?

im not sold just yet because he was going against Zona's young secondary. i still can see him getting the ball more this year (maybe wr3 potential) w/ newton taking shots down the field more than Clausen/Moore did last year. my 2 cents

I'm still around it's just that no one's really popping in to ask anymore questions.

Newtons arrival should breath some life back into the Panthers anemic areal attack, they seem to also be committed to throwing his way a lot more so depending on the matchup he should be a good WR2-3 going forward.

Don't expect any more single coverage though

ugh fu*k Brandon Lloyd for not playing. Screwed me over cause I couldnt be home to update my roster(don't have a Blackberry or smartphone)

Illuminati said: I'm still around it's just that no one's really popping in to ask anymore questions. Newtons arrival should breath some life back into the Panthers anemic areal attack, they seem to also be committed to throwing his way a lot more so depending on the matchup he should be a good WR2-3 going forward. Don't expect any more single coverage though

Let's get this going again....thread had been helpful in the past. I usually do my own thing but when I'm torn on a decision I like to get some input and u was pretty solid before


hasselback vs Denver
Grossman vs Dallas


And

packers vs Chicago
49ers vs Cincinnati

Prob going hasselback and packers....can't see myself starting Grossman but packers without Collins and back to back 400 yard passing games on them have me debating starting the niners against rookie qb

So I guess this is dead