Same here, I was watching last night game as just an unbias NBA fan (even though at heart I am a big a.ss Laker fan) and I saw alot of calls and fouls that could have went on the Lakers, but I guess they were make up calls from game 1 & 2. Kuz we all know that game 2 was fixed.
Nah, that game was reffed well because for every call you saw that could've gone against the Lakers there was the same that could be said for the Celtics. Next game, watch all the moving screens that the Celtics get away with. Hell, Kobe's 3rd foul I think it was in Game 2 when he "pushed" Paul Pierce was only because PJ Brown pushes Kobe from behind into Pierce and Pierce sells it perfectly.
Now for people (or haters, I see alot on this thread) to complain about how the Kings should have won in that series is ignorant. And I say that because the reason why the Kings were up 3-2 in the first place is because of a no-call on the Bibby shot.
Watch the moving screen by Chris Webber on Derek Fisher:
And the Lakers won that series because they were the better team that hit their freethrows in Game 7. Point Blank, end of discussion.
--Now people wanna complain about the Brent Barry no-call.
Well first of all, that possession should've never happened. Fisher's shot before that hit the rim so the Lakers should've had a fresh :24 but we didn't. Also, just as the "icing on the cake" Barry traveled on that last play but it wasn't called. Two no-calls in exchange for one? It ain't fair but considering the circumstances I'll take it.
And the funniest comment in this thread is that the Nets would've won a ring against the Lakers. How do you figure? The Nets got swept buddy, no way in hell they were winning that series in any way.