lmao how the fu*k u gon give me hate & say:

"who cares what u think ur not even a real sports fan u got like 5 different teams 2 basketball teams 2 football teams who are u really repping bro "

who cares what i think??? if u dont care what others think why post this??? u mad cuz i shutdown all the sh*t u said?? the funny thing is, u didnt even say this, u copy & pasted, lol...grow up & face it...none of the sh*t u listed(which was stolen from somebody else, lol u just like bellicheck, ) is on the same level as what the pats did


& for the last time, my teams r the dolphins & the lakers...but i rep hometeams too, cant hate on my home

beantown85 said This is getting off topic but of course it was a fumble... tahts why they changed the rule afterwards. But the fact of the matter was that going strictly by the rule, then yea it was a forward pass if you really break down the rule that much... Pats still had to come back and win that game with 2 rediculous vinatieri kicks

I don't know exactly how the rule is broken down that's why I bring it up any time I can! The way I see it, Brady's left hand touched the ball so there is no way he was still in the motion of throwing the ball!!! Woodson hit him, ball comes out Biekert recovers...

How Do I Teach These Keeeeeeeeeeedddsssss!!!

danny2132 said Like I said in the other forum...it really dont matter if they knew what plays to call, they still had to make the plays, they did and they won...and whos to say that they didnt have someone stealing signs in this years superbowl, the only difference is they didnt make the plays and they lost...the only thing they are guilty of is getting caught, most teams do things to have an edge, sometimes it works, sometimes it doesnt, but thats why they play the games....if it was such an advantage why did they only win each superbowl by 3 points, they would have murdered those teams if they had that much of an advantage...

So because they only won by 3 points, means it wasnt that much an advantage...

So lets go through winning 12 games in the regular season, and 4 or 5 in the playoffs, including the big one...

So knowing your opponents, signals, formations, audibles, situation in which they call certain plays... that means nothing?

typical boxden..full of haters

most teams change signals every game, sometimes even in between quarters

it's not illegal to steal signals..the position of the cameras is what got the patriots fined

$ is Me said The giants aint on that list for cheating

OWNED

they still cheated and got caught so uhhhh there you have it. in the end karma fu*ked them at the perfect time.

who cares, whatever happens, the patriots are going to have the mental "asterisk" in people's heads when they are discussing the patriots team of the 2000 decade.

i just wish espn and people would move on about it. people who think the pats are right are always gonna think that, people who thing the pats cheated will always think that.

"you play to win the game!!"

tommymm96 said typical boxden..full of haters most teams change signals every game, sometimes even in between quarters it's not illegal to steal signals..the position of the cameras is what got the patriots fined

its not even about just the signals


its about knowing "on 3rd & 6, when ___________(insert team) lines up in the I formation wit 3 wrs, they usually run ________________, but when they r in the redzone they use that formation but they do this ___________"

& the same goes for defensive packages & plays, zones, blitzes all of that

little sh*t like that, its having more then reasonable knowledge of tendancies...

casper said its not even about just the signals its about knowing "on 3rd & 6, when ___________(insert team) lines up in the I formation wit 3 wrs, they usually run ________________, but when they r in the redzone they use that formation but they do this ___________" & the same goes for defensive packages & plays, zones, blitzes all of that little sh*t like that, its having more then reasonable knowledge of tendancies...

my point exactly