Dec 13 - Men Are Now Afraid To Give Women CPR Because Of #metoo and False Accusations |
![]() |
2 months ago |
![]() ![]() |
1940 page views 80 comments ![]() ![]() ![]() $24,472 | ![]() |
Dec 13 - Men Are Now Afraid To Give Women CPR Because Of #metoo and False Accusations
![]() Women who fall over with a heart attack may be left unaided – as men are too afraid to give CPR in case they are accused of s*xual a*sault. Researchers from the University of Colorado surveyed people on their attitudes in the wake of the #MeToo movement. Interviewees said (among other things) that they feared being accused of inappropriate touching or s*xual a*sault, the researchers found. Men were twice as likely to cite this fear as a reason for not administering CPR, the researchers found. Study lead author Sarah Perman of the University of Colorado School of Medicine in Denver, said: ‘The consequences of all of these major themes is that women will potentially receive no CPR or delays in initiation of CPR. ‘While these are actual fears the public holds, it is important to realise that CPR is lifesaving and should be rendered to collapsed individuals regardless of gender, race or ethnicity.’ Administering CPR at the moment of a heart attack roughly triples a person’s chances of surviving, the researchers said. ![]() |
|
2 months ago |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() $7,161 | ![]() |
[pic - click to view] I don't think you even have to use mouth to mouth for CPR any more. But if it's the only way a person knows how to save a life, and that woman screams r*pe, that's just wild |
|
2 months ago |
![]() ![]() | |
![]() ![]() ![]() $28,226 | ![]() |
These newly made victims look like bi*ches. Ain't no real HUMAN afraid to help someone dying It's just an excuse to be a piece of sh*t and whip out your phone and record , as opposed to helping | |
|
2 months ago |
![]() ![]() | ||
![]() ![]() ![]() $5,447 | ![]() |
[pic - click to view] keeping it 100, after dude got shot trying to help during that shooting in Alabama I'll be watching from the sidelines like [pic - click to view] no fu*ks given | ||
|
2 months ago |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() $24,545 | ![]() |
Bullsh*t
Anybody saying that is just looking for a reason to criticize the movement. Like you really think a woman is going to accuse you of r*pe after you save her life, just take a moment think about how fu*king stupid that sounds. |
|
2 months ago |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() $5,447 | ![]() |
Man revives woman with AED, but branded 'pervert' for removing her clothes to apply electrode pads
A man in Japan says he was questioned by police and branded a “pervert” after providing emergency medical a*sistance to a woman. The man was attending to the woman who had been involved in a traffic accident when he believes someone who saw him cutting through the woman’s clothes to apply a defibrillator to her bare chest called the police and reported him for behaving inappropriately. An Automated External Defibrillator (AED) analyses the rhythm of the heart and, if necessary, delivers an electrical shock to help it return to normal. AEDs are provided in public places and are designed to be operated by members of the public, even those with no medical background. The man is now calling for better understanding of the correct use of AEDs. In a series of posts on Twitter earlier this month, the unnamed Japanese man described the incident. He happened upon the scene of a traffic accident in which the driver was not seriously injured, but a female passenger was unconscious and he could not detect a pulse. The man began to administer artificial respiration and CPR to the woman, and contacted the emergency services. After an AED was procured from a nearby convenience store, the man began to cut through the woman’s clothes in order to administer it. An AED, which applies an electric shock to a patient suffering cardiac arrest, requires direct contact between the pads and the skin. Any clothing which is in the way must be removed. However, when the man started to use the scissors, which were included in the AED’s box, to cut through the woman’s clothes, the driver of the vehicle told him to stop, asking what he was doing and calling him “hentai” (pervert). At this time, he believes, the driver of the car contacted the police to report him as a “chikan” (s*xual molester). After the injured parties had been taken to hospital, the man who had administered the AED gave his account of the incident to police. He was then handed over to a separate police authority, who questioned him about the report they had received that he was acting inappropriately at the scene of the accident. Once the man explained that he had been cutting through the woman’s clothes in order to use the AED, he was not questioned any further. The man was later informed that – thanks to his bravery and quick-thinking, not to mention correct use of the AED – the woman had survived. He also reported that he was offered a certificate of appreciation, which he declined. The Twitter user ends his story with this comment: “An AED is supposed to be applied directly to the skin. Because the electric current it produces is strong, the underwire of a bra could prove extremely dangerous [if not removed before using]. Please remember this.” In Japan, as in other countries, AEDs are provided in public spaces such as shopping centres, schools and sports facilities. They are designed to be operated by members of the public who may not have received training, and their use is covered in first aid courses. Time is of the essence in the event of a sudden cardiac arrest: after only three to five minutes, the patient can start to suffer irreversible brain damage. The Red Cross states that for each minute defibrillation is delayed, the chance of survival drops by 10 percent. Increased public awareness about where to find AEDs and how to use them, as well as increased provision of the devices, are therefore vital to reducing deaths from cardiac arrest. It seems like this incident had a happy ending, but it seems that if the person who called the police – or indeed the police officers themselves – had known that it was necessary to remove clothing to use an AED, they wouldn’t have had to waste time interviewing someone who was acting entirely appropriately. [pic - click to view] |
|
2 months ago |
![]() ![]() | |
![]() ![]() ![]() $1,958 | ![]() |
![]() | |
|
2 months ago |
![]() ![]() | |
![]() ![]() ![]() $7,033 | ![]() |
![]() | |
|
2 months ago |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() $11,880 | ![]() |
Let me enlighten yal how dumb people are.
On multiple ( >10) occasions I have responded to calls where a person was dying or a out to die. In which o either had to take off a womans shirt or pick up her nekkid body to get her to a unit. And family members/friends wanted me to stop what I was doing because they thought we were going to look at them in some s*xual manner. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
2 months ago |
![]() ![]() | |
![]() ![]() ![]() $7,033 | ![]() |
| |
|
2 months ago |
![]() ![]() | ||
![]() ![]() $7,161 | ![]() |
You don't have to Gat damn it You still have to open the shirt, just the chest area not brea*t. But she may have big t*tties so.... Man if she wake up and scream r*pe after I save her life, I'm putting that food back in her and save fu*k you | ||
|
2 months ago |
![]() ![]() | |
![]() ![]() ![]() $28,250 | ![]() |
| |
|
2 months ago |
![]() ![]() | |
![]() ![]() ![]() $13,690 | ![]() |
| |
|
|
|
|