Damagegadget said
says your not basing, but you are ..not being aware is solely based on the lack of education by the occupiers, the aztecs wasnt their name, and again the info you have is based on making them savages... but you ignored the part in which columbus himself wrote this as a utopia
in the end, it is the devils tongue at work, man is not inherently bad, but tempted..
now if people are warring with each other, most often it wasnt some sneaky stab you in the back while acting like Im your friend isht ..that has plagued "european" war culture from our perspective in america..
now am I here to say all europeans are inherently evil..no 1st because the terms like "white" includes arabic muslims and "black" skinned people of north africa..
what war boils down to is greed...so tracking back to when greed was introduced to us as people will perhaps better identify the underlying cause..now Im not one to generalize, but the european culture or "westernization" is inherently evil, until its dismantled than you are inherently evil under the supremacy agenda
|
So you're telling me before Columbus arrived there was no war in the Americas. Not a single person in those societies was guilty of greed? The same for Africa? If you want to single out the way the Europeans went with it, I'm fine with that. I'm not here to defend Europeans or western civilization. My question remains, was it ever okay for any group anywhere to subject the next group and are there some factual examples of societies that operated outside of the might makes right rules? I'm asking this about ancient civilizations entirely, not the relatively recent imperialistic era.
Put it this way, without any outside interaction you have bloody wars fought all over the world. You don't have to look at Europe, take China or Japan. Millions of people are k*lled internally all for the sake of some group to reach the pinnacle of power. This isn't a uniquely European thing. The Mongols damn near overran the entirety of Europe and were it not for internal succession issues probably would have. Centuries years later, opinions on them vary strongly based on how close you were impacted by their actions.
I will say I disagree with this notion of "Noble war", but this is all based on my understanding of "Western" history. If you have any alternative historical accounts, I'm always interested in learning.