Mperfection said
Um that's like asking how is clearing a sample different than using a different person to replicate a singers voice. There is a clear distinction between the two to me. You can't sample dude voice and repurpose it for free... or so I would a*sume. Would you be cool with your job firing you and then repurposing samples of your voice to continue making money?
That's like saying someone could sample Beyonce, use AI to transpose her voice, and then put out an album and it would all be fine.
If they hire a new voice actor, I imagine that voice actor will be paid and credited for their work.
This whole thing is a slippery slope. How many hours of recordings do they need to generate an imitation of your voice and cut you the person out? Same can go for images with the proliferation of AI? They could sample cuts of a person in a movie and create an entire film starring said person without crediting or paying them? sh*t sounds dystopian and is disturbing af if you ask me.
|
They wouldn't be using Roiland's real voice though just the character's voice. I'm not sure about the law for that but that's beside the point anyway.
Whether or not they use AI to generate the voice, they are still using the voice created by Justin. It's just as morally (again, not sure about lawfully) wrong to steal the voice someone's created as it is to use an AI to generate it. The end result is them still using the voice created by Justin. The only moral angle I see is leaving someone without a job (which isn't what you were talking about anyway)
A better comparison is using AI to release a Beyonce album vs someone imitating Beyonce and releasing it as a Beyonce album. I think both are equally fu*ked up but I guess to each their own
![Shrug]()