2,178
 

Study claims 5G 'overheats insect antennas'


 


section   (0 bx goons and 1 bystanders) Share this on Twitter       Share this on Facebook
 

New replies show every 10 seconds
 4 weeks ago '05        #26
Y.G. 27 heat pts27
space
space
space
$44,099 | Props total: 20445 20445
 Dawknight316 said
Why do we need 5G again?

My phone is fast enough and If I can't recieve data Big Deal, unless I am using google maps then I care, but I don't need 5G for google maps.
5G isn't about phones. It's geared more towards IoT and home internet. 1Gbps speeds will be more attainable with mass deployment of 5G. You're not getting that with 4G.
+2   

 4 weeks ago '14        #27
Dawknight316 3 heat pts
space
avatar space
space
$3,262 | Props total: 4216 4216
 Y.G. said
5G isn't about phones. It's geared more towards IoT and home internet. 1Gbps speeds will be more attainable with mass deployment of 5G. You're not getting that with 4G.
Exactly. So why do we need 5G again?

There's not 1 positive thing I see coming from 5G.
+1   

 4 weeks ago '05        #28
Y.G. 27 heat pts27
space
space
space
$44,099 | Props total: 20445 20445
 Dawknight316 said
Exactly. So why do we need 5G again?

There's not 1 positive thing I see coming from 5G.
I just told you dude.

It will provide more accessible internet at an affordable price. There are people in America that are stuck on internet plans that are less than 5Mbps. Those of us that are fortunate to have decent speeds are usually stuck with one choice for home internet. 5G will change all of that.
+2   

 4 weeks ago '18        #29
Rasheed Walrus 2 heat pts
space
avatar space
space
$1,428 | Props total: 5908 5908
 Nike said
Facts b with the up most
Utmost
+1   

 4 weeks ago '14        #30
Dawknight316 3 heat pts
space
avatar space
space
$3,262 | Props total: 4216 4216
 Y.G. said
I just told you dude.

It will provide more accessible internet at an affordable price. There are people in America that are stuck on internet plans that are less than 5Mbps. Those of us that are fortunate to have decent speeds are usually stuck with one choice for home internet. 5G will change all of that.
We don't need more ignorant motherfu*kers on the internet. Just look at half the people on this site.

From what I have gather over the past few week about 5G is that 5G is bad for our health and environment. Smaller radio towers that can only transmit short distance and struggles getting through walls and Trees.

5G will also lead industry 4.0... AKA automation and robotic technology.
+1   

 4 weeks ago '05        #31
lamarowns 
space
avatar space
space
$3,374 | Props total: 3895 3895
Stuff like this makes me think we aren't the pinnacle, and that the dolphin ppl got next
+1   

 4 weeks ago '05        #32
Y.G. 27 heat pts27
space
space
space
$44,099 | Props total: 20445 20445
 Dawknight316 said
We don't need more ignorant motherfu*kers on the internet. Just look at half the people on this site.

From what I have gather over the past few week about 5G is that 5G is bad for our health and environment. Smaller radio towers that can only transmit short distance and struggles getting through walls and Trees.

5G will also lead industry 4.0... AKA automation and robotic technology.
Yeah, let's prevent poor and disenfranchised or rural communities from having the same tools that the rest of the population has, just so we can keep them off Boxden and other social media. Seems legit.

I don't know about the long-term affects of 5G, no one does at this point. But I do know having competition in the home broadband market will make my internet bill cheaper.
+1   

 4 weeks ago '14        #33
Dawknight316 3 heat pts
space
avatar space
space
$3,262 | Props total: 4216 4216
 Y.G. said
Yeah, let's prevent poor and disenfranchised or rural communities from having the same tools that the rest of the population has, just so we can keep them off Boxden and other social media. Seems legit.

I don't know about the long-term affects of 5G, no one does at this point. But I do know having competition in the home broadband market will make my internet bill cheaper.
Facebook and twitter spread a lot of ignorance my guy. Not just BX. You don’t understand how the internet is dumbing down society. How they are using it to control people and thought. But remember this day when a robot takes your Job.
+2   

 4 weeks ago '05        #34
Y.G. 27 heat pts27
space
space
space
$44,099 | Props total: 20445 20445
 Dawknight316 said
Facebook and twitter spread a lot of ignorance my guy. Not just BX. You don’t understand how the internet is dumbing down society. How they are using it to control people and thought. But remember this day when a robot takes your Job.
Not everyone uses social media.

I'm a Sr. software engineer, my job won't be automated anytime soon.
+1   

 4 weeks ago '13        #35
BLACK MAMBA 56 heat pts56
space
avatar space
space
$4,348 | Props total: 4796 4796
 Dawknight316 said
Facebook and twitter spread a lot of ignorance my guy. Not just BX. You don’t understand how the internet is dumbing down society. How they are using it to control people and thought. But remember this day when a robot takes your Job.
bruh i saw some propaganda post about r*pe, then i saw this chick a couple weeks later and she’s like “ did you hear? they’re legalizing r*pe”

social media is influencing weak minded people in real life

sh*ts scary low key
+1   

 4 weeks ago '14        #36
Dawknight316 3 heat pts
space
avatar space
space
$3,262 | Props total: 4216 4216
 Y.G. said
Not everyone uses social media.

I'm a Sr. software engineer, my job won't be automated anytime soon.
You sure about that?


 4 weeks ago '14        #37
Dawknight316 3 heat pts
space
avatar space
space
$3,262 | Props total: 4216 4216
 BLACK MAMBA said
bruh i saw some propaganda post about r*pe, then i saw this chick a couple weeks later and she’s like “ did you hear? they’re legalizing r*pe”

social media is influencing weak minded people in real life

sh*ts scary low key
This is how Trump got elected. People didn't know what to believe, what was fact or fiction about Bernie, Trump, Hilary...

People need to learn to properly research things and make judgement for themselves. Stop getting info from Memes. The first thing I learned before logging on the internet is don't believe everything you read on the internet. It's really sad.

 4 weeks ago '05        #38
Y.G. 27 heat pts27
space
space
space
$44,099 | Props total: 20445 20445
 Dawknight316 said
You sure about that?

Yes. Automation for database oriented engineers (SQL devs) is low. Do your Googles. Sorry to disappoint you.

 4 weeks ago '18        #39
David akaLegion 7 heat pts
space
avatar space
space
$995 | Props total: 2613 2613
Good fu*k them wasps/hornets

 4 weeks ago '04        #40
grydlok 42 heat pts42
space
avatar space
space
$10,719 | Props total: 4822 4822
 Y.G. said
Yes. Automation for database oriented engineers (SQL devs) is low. Do your Googles. Sorry to disappoint you.
How they are going to Google search when they don't even read the source article, where it clearly states in the original source material written in English

5g has not shown to cause problem with insects but they worry when they move to 10g in the future.


The entire article is full of speculation and you are arguing with people using who are using strawman arguments.
+2   

 4 weeks ago '14        #41
Dawknight316 3 heat pts
space
avatar space
space
$3,262 | Props total: 4216 4216
 Y.G. said
Yes. Automation for database oriented engineers (SQL devs) is low. Do your Googles. Sorry to disappoint you.
They gonna take everything my guy. They are going to be creating the algorithms soon. You know about quantum computing?

 4 weeks ago '06        #42
Doe Sun 3 heat pts
space
space
space
$973 | Props total: 567 567
^ oxymoron. If 4G can't prevent an ignorant like you from coming on, your point is moot about 5G.
+3   

 4 weeks ago '05        #43
Y.G. 27 heat pts27
space
space
space
$44,099 | Props total: 20445 20445
 grydlok said
How they are going to Google search when they don't even read the source article, where it clearly states in the original source material written in English

5g has not shown to cause problem with insects but they worry when they move to 10g in the future.


The entire article is full of speculation and you are arguing with people using who are using strawman arguments.
You're right. Now dude is saying quantum computing will take everything.
+2   

 4 weeks ago '11        #44
Slingy 71 heat pts71
space
avatar space
space
$6,081 | Props total: 6013 6013
 Kdub31 said
Do we really need faster service on our phones?... this 4g is straight its not like anybody wants to pay more money for 5g especially with the risk of getting some exotic a*s cancer
Exactly. If they just upped the speeds we get already and didn't cap them everything would be fine.

This 5G sh*t is for military use and it's being pitched to us as faster internet.
+1   

 4 weeks ago '06        #45
presto 7 heat pts
space
space
space
$2,400 | Props total: 404 404
my n*gga, 4g good enough.. chill off that sh*t. i aint tryna burn up

 3 weeks ago '18        #46
Most Palone 
space
space
space
$1,162 | Props total: 1996 1996
 FrankAndBeans said
You believe that sh*t? You think a bee can pollinate better than a human? Get the f*ck outta here.

 3 weeks ago '05        #47
autoraptronix 14 heat pts14
space
avatar space
space
$5,574 | Props total: 1622 1622
The scientist in the article below predicted 5G would affect insects due to their high volume to surface area (small bodies). You know what else has small bodies? Fetuses and infants.

This scientist also predicted an epidemic in blindness, cataracts, kidney damage, and spontaneous abortions and an astronomical rise in autism cases due to the high frequency, pulsed microwaves acting on areas of the body with more water volume.



Top Scientist: 5G Is ‘Criminally Insane’ & Will ‘Fry Living Things’
Published on March 18, 2019
Written by John O'Sullivan


Warning of grave danger to life due to the mass 5G roll out is issued by Dr. Martin Pall, Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences at Washington State University. Real risk of fires, organ damage.

Professor Pall, is a widely cited scientist on the biological effects of electromagnetic fields and a leading expert in how wireless radiation impacts the electrical systems in our bodies, He warns:

“I predict that many organisms will be much more impacted than we will. This includes insects and other arthropods, birds and small mammals and amphibia. It includes plants including even large trees, because trees have leaves and reproductive organs that are highly exposed. I predict there will be major ecological disasters as a consequence of 5G ….. This will include vast conflagrations because EMF exposures make plants much more flammable.

In a world where shocking behavior has become less and less shocking, I consider EU and U.S. views and actions to be shocking. The U.S. situation is mass insanity. I would have hoped that the Europeans, who think of themselves as being much more thoughtful than Americans, would have been genuinely more thoughtful.”

Professor Pall has published 7 studies showing there exists exquisite sensitivity to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) in the voltage sensor in each cell, such that the force impacting our cells at the voltage sensor has massive impact on the biology on the cells of our bodies.


Read the PDF (4 Pages): Pall-Letter-to-CalLegis-FINAL-8-7-17

Professor Pall also offers a 90 page, seven chapter document on EMF effects, how they are produced in the body and the corruption of the international science:



Chapter 7 from the book:

5G: Great risk for EU, U.S. and International Health! Compelling Evidencefor Eight Distinct Types of Great Harm Caused by Electromagnetic Field(EMF) Exposures and the Mechanism that Causes Them

Written and Compiled by Martin L. Pall, PhD, Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences, Washington State UniversityAddress: 638 NE 41st Ave., Portland OR 97232 USA, 503-232-3883 May 17, 2018

Chapter 7: The Great Risks of 5G: What We Know and What We Don’t Know ( See the book for references)

We have already discussed two issues that are essential to understanding 5G. One is that pulsed EMFs are, in most cases, much more biologically active than are non-pulsed (often called continuous wave) EMFs.

A second is that the EMFs act by putting forces on the voltage sensor of the VGCCs, opening these calcium channels and allowing excessive calcium ions to flow into the cell. The voltage sensor is extraordinarily sensitive to those electrical forces, such that the safety guidelines are allowing us to be exposed to EMFs that are something like 7.2 million times too high.

The reason that the industry has decided to go to the extremely high frequencies of 5G is that with such extremely high frequencies, it is possible to carry much more information via much more pulsation than it is possible to carry with lower frequencies even in the microwave range.

We can be a*sured, therefore, that 5G will involve vastly more pulsation than do EMFs that we are currently exposed to. It follows from that, that any biological safety test of 5G must use the very rapid pulsations including whatever very short term spikes may be present, that are to be present in genuine 5G.

There is an additional process that is planned to be used in 5G: phased arrays ().


[pic - click to view]



Here multiple antenna elements act together to produce highly pulsed fields which are designed for 5G, to produce increased penetration. 5G will entail particularly powerful pulsations to be used, which may, therefore, be particularly hazardous.

The only data we have, to my knowledge, on millimeter wave frequencies of 5G used non-pulsed EMFs in the millimeter frequency range of 5G, not genuine 5G. Such millimeter waves have been shown to produce a number of downstream effects of VGCC activation.

One millimeter wave study showed that it activated both the VGCCs and also the voltage-gated potassium channels, suggesting that it worked via the voltage sensor, as do other EMFs [136]. Any such data tells us almost nothing about how biologically active genuine very highly pulsed 5G will be.

I take it that from their statements, that both Mr. Ryan and Dr. Vinciūnas are ready to put out 10s of millions of 5G antennae to afflict every single person in the EU with 5G radiation without even a single biological test of safety of genuine 5G.

Why does 5G need such high numbers of antennae? It is because the 5G radiation is much more absorbed as it enters various materials. The approach is to use many more antennae with one found every few houses, such that 5G can sufficiently penetrate local walls. Such absorption usually involves the interaction with electrically charged groups, such that such high absorption is likely to involve placing forces on electrically charged groups.

Because such forces are the way in which EMFs activate the VGCCs, it seems highly likely, therefore, that 5G radiation will be particularly active in VGCC activation.

In summary, then, 5G is predicted to be particularly dangerous for each of four different reasons:

1. The extraordinarily high numbers of antennae that are planned.

2. The very high energy outputs which will be used to ensure penetration.

3. The extraordinarily high pulsation levels.

4.The apparent high level interactions of the 5G frequency on charged groups presumably including the voltage sensor charged groups.


Now what the telecommunications industry argues is that 5G radiation will be mostly absorbed in the outer 1 or 2 mm of the body, such that they claim that we don’t have to worry about the effects. There is some truth to that, but there are also some caveats that make any conclusions made from that, much more suspect. In any case, these surface effects of 5G will have especially strong impact on organisms with much higher surface to volume ratios.

Consequently, I predict that many organisms will be much more impacted than we will. This includes insects and other arthropods, birds and small mammals and amphibia. It includes plants including even large trees, because trees have leaves and reproductive organs that are highly exposed. I predict there will be major ecological disasters as a consequence of 5G. This will include vast conflagrations because EMF exposures make plants much more flammable.

But let’s get back to humans. The industry has also made claims that more conventional microwave frequency EMFs are limited in effect to the outer 1 cm of the body. We know that is not true, however because of the effects deep in the human brain, on the heart and on hormone systems.

Perhaps the most important two studies demonstrating effects deep within the body are the studies of Professor Hässig and his colleagues in Switzerland on cataract formation in newborn calves [137,138]. These two studies clearly show that when pregnant cows are grazing near mobile phone base stations (also called cell phone towers), the calves are born with very greatly increased incidences of cataracts.

It follows from these findings that even though the developing fetuses are very deep in the body of the mother and should be highly protected from the EMF exposures, they are not so protected. And because the EMF safety guidelines in Switzerland are 100 times more stringent than are the safety guidelines in most of the rest of Europe, in the U.S., Canada and most of the rest of the world, the more general safety guidelines allow greatly excessive exposures and penetration of effects.

The claims of industry that microwave frequency EMFs only act in the outer centimeter of the body are clearly false.

How then can both conventional microwave frequency EMFs and 5G radiation act deeply within the body? You may correctly observe that the electrical effects of the EMFs activate the voltage sensor and that the direct electrical forces are rapidly attenuated in the body. So how can we get deep effects?

I think the answer is that the magnetic parts of the EMFs have been known for decades to penetrate much more deeply than do the electrical parts.

The magnetic fields put forces on mobile electrically charged groups dissolved in the aqueous phases of the body and small individual movements of the charged groups can regenerate electric fields that are essentially identical to the electric fields of the original EMFs, carrying the same frequency and same pulsation pattern, although with lower intensity. An example of this is given in the Lu and Ueno [139] study.

Because the voltage sensor is so stunningly sensitive to electrical forces and part of the reason for that is the very high level of amplification of the electrical field across the plasma membrane, we have an almost perfect way in which to produce EMF effects deeply within our bodies.

I am very concerned that 5G may produce effects like those we already see produced from lower frequency EMFs but are much more severe. I am also concerned that we will also see responses that are qualitatively different.

Let me give you three possible examples of the latter type and one quantitative example. Each of the four types of blindness, have downstream effects of VGCC activation as causal factors: cataracts, detached retinas, glaucoma and macular degeneration. The aqueous and vitreous humors in the eye may be an ideal environment for the regeneration of the electrical fields within the eye.

Retinoblastoma; Glioblastoma, Retinal; Glioma, Retinal ...
We may, therefore have a gigantic epidemic of each of the four types of blindness. Another concern focuses on kidney dysfunction, which was shown in Chapter 5 to be impacted by EMFs. The kidneys have much fluid, both blood and also what will become urine, which may allow efficient the regeneration of electrical fields. Such regeneration may be expected to impact both the glomerular filtration and also the reabsorption, both essential to kidney function.

Does this mean that 5G will produce very large increases in kidney failure? The only way to find out is to do biological safety testing of genuine 5G radiation. Let me give you a third example. Fetuses and very young babies have much more water in their bodies than do adults.

Therefore, they may be a special risk for impacts of 5G, because of great increases in the regeneration of the electrical fields. Here one can think of all kinds of possibilities. Let me suggest two. We may have a gigantic (sorry about using that word again) epidemic of spontaneous abortion due the teratogenic effects.

Another possibility is that instead of autism being one birth in 38, however horrendous that is, it could be one out of two, or even a majority of births.
I don’t know that these will happen, but these are the kinds of risks we are taking and there are many others one can think of. Putting in tens of millions of 5G antennae without a single biological test of safety has got to be about the stupidest idea anyone has had in the history of the world.

This brings us back to the earlier point. The only way to do 5G safety testing is to do genuine 5G biological safety testing. I have published on how this can be done relatively easily at relatively low cost and have, as you saw in the Chapter 6, told the FCC how this can be done. Those tests must be done by organizations completely independent of industry and that leaves out both ICNIRP and SCENIHR and a lot of other organizations.


Last edited by autoraptronix; 06-03-2019 at 12:39 PM..
+2   

 4 days ago '14        #48
Leadfoot 79 heat pts79
space
avatar space
space
$3,093 | Props total: 2303 2303
Keep the Bees, take the mosquitoes.
+1   

New replies show every 10 seconds
Home      
  




 


 
 




most viewed right now
online now  14
Jun 24 - McDonald's started using fresh meat. Here's what happened to sales
194 comments
2 days ago
@news
most viewed right now
+125online now  11
Video inside “While yall were screaming oscars so white I went and built my own, I d..
94 comments
2 days ago
@movies
most viewed right now
online now  8
Game Theory: YOUTUBE IS KILLING GAMING!!!
47 comments
2 days ago
@games
most viewed right now
online now  7
Image(s) inside HOLY sh-t: NIPSEY MOM Is EXPOSING LAPD & MEDIA At BET AWARD DURING SPE..
311 comments
2 days ago
@hiphop
back to top
register contact Follow BX @ Twitter Follow BX @ Facebook search BX privacy