4,591
 

Sony owns 900 marvel characters



ADVERTISEMENT
 
topics gone triple plat - Number 1 spot 3X PLAT




section  x1   |  0 bx goons and 1 bystanders Share this on Twitter       Share this on Facebook

section games
  
New replies show every 20 seconds
 1 month ago '15        #26
satsuma  topics gone triple plat - Number 1 spot x1
Props total: 7328 7 K  Slaps total: 3261 3 K
The real question is which one's don't they own?

 1 month ago '15        #27
SSJ4 Goku  topics gone triple plat - Number 1 spot x10
Props total: 101644 101 K  Slaps total: 10094 10 K
Sony owns anything spiderman related. Villlains, different variations of him; if they wanted too, sony could make a an uncle ben movie. So the idea of sony owning isn't too far fetched but this a reach.

Disney/Marvel Owns what see now except for hulk, whose contractual obligated to only appear in marvel films with another character, no solo films. Because his rights are still owned by universal studios.

Info-graphic for anyone who cares


+3   

 1 month ago '15        #28
SSJ4 Goku  topics gone triple plat - Number 1 spot x10
Props total: 101644 101 K  Slaps total: 10094 10 K
 Ippo said
Hulk
Wendigo
Sabertooth
Magneto
Prof x
The thing
Cyclops
The blob
Venom
Quicksilver
Omega red
Silver samurai
Thor
Silver surfer
Thanos
Apocalypse
Mordok
Juggernaut
Colossus
Rogue
Gambit
Blade
Kravin
Carnage
Cyber
Sabertooth
Mr sinister
Archangel
Deadpool
Disney owns half of who you just mentioned because of the fox deal.
+1   

 1 month ago '05        #29
jwill 
Props total: 1565 1 K  Slaps total: 287 287
 Faythung said
At no point did I say they should alienate Marvel. The article implied that's what they're doing with Venom, which it isn't and as others in here have said isn't really something they can do.

If they want to keep using Spiderman and Wolverine on PS then they need to play nice with Marvel.
Wrong. They own those characters. They just need to continue to make movies every x number of years so that their ownership does not expire and can renew the license. However realizing by incorporating their spiderman (Tom Holland) into Marvel's spiderman and not confusing people guarantees way more money at the box office and in homes. From that standpoint they take into consideration what Marvel would like for spiderman but are not obligated to do so. They are well within their rights to make a spiderman that destroys the possibility of crossing with Marvel but that would be financially idiotic.

 1 month ago '12        #30
Faythung  topics gone triple plat - Number 1 spot x1
Props total: 23317 23 K  Slaps total: 2106 2 K
 jwill said
Wrong. They own those characters. They just need to continue to make movies every x number of years so that their ownership does not expire and can renew the license. However realizing by incorporating their spiderman (Tom Holland) into Marvel's spiderman and not confusing people guarantees way more money at the box office and in homes. From that standpoint they take into consideration what Marvel would like for spiderman but are not obligated to do so. They are well within their rights to make a spiderman that destroys the possibility of crossing with Marvel but that would be financially idiotic.
They do not own the rights to Spiderman in video games, only movies, or live action. If Marvel wanted to give the character to someone else to make a game then they could but they won't because Sony own the rights to him in movies and they need to cooperate.


Last edited by Faythung; 09-12-2021 at 01:38 PM..
+1   

 1 month ago '07        #31
killacar 
Props total: 18586 18 K  Slaps total: 1169 1 K
 SSJ4 Goku said
Sony owns anything spiderman related. Villlains, different variations of him; if they wanted too, sony could make a an uncle ben movie. So the idea of sony owning isn't too far fetched but this a reach.

Disney/Marvel Owns what see now except for hulk, whose contractual obligated to only appear in marvel films with another character, no solo films. Because his rights are still owned by universal studios.

Info-graphic for anyone who cares


Graphic outdated now, all those Netflix properties back with Marvel

 1 month ago '07        #32
killacar 
Props total: 18586 18 K  Slaps total: 1169 1 K
 SSJ4 Goku said
Disney owns half of who you just mentioned because of the fox deal.
Disney owns all of what he mentioned except for like 4
+1   

 1 month ago '15        #33
SSJ4 Goku  topics gone triple plat - Number 1 spot x10
Props total: 101644 101 K  Slaps total: 10094 10 K
 killacar said
Graphic outdated now, all those Netflix properties back with Marvel
True, just used that as example. But i'll take that as a lesson. Disney strong arming companies for their properties.
+1   

 1 month ago '12        #34
Bazileus 
Props total: 7522 7 K  Slaps total: 1756 1 K
Make an X-Men Legends 3 or fu*koff
+1   

 1 month ago '15        #35
SSJ4 Goku  topics gone triple plat - Number 1 spot x10
Props total: 101644 101 K  Slaps total: 10094 10 K
 killacar said
Disney owns all of what he mentioned except for like 4
That too. Because i was looking at that like? Didn't they just get the rights back for mutants?
+1   

 1 month ago '07        #36
killacar 
Props total: 18586 18 K  Slaps total: 1169 1 K
 SSJ4 Goku said
True, just used that as example. But i'll take that as a lesson. Disney strong arming companies for their properties.
Lol right, Sony just need to make a deal where they get a percentage of all the Spider-Man and Spider-Man related movies and don't have to actually do anything, like fu*k it cuz Spider-Man is great stand alone, but he shines being in the mix with other super heroes, and now ain't no way to to mix him in without Marvel

Universal just need to let go of those distribution rights or sell them off because Hulk also shines being mixed in with other Superheroes, and they can easily tell his stories now and more accurately without it necessarily being a full on solo Hulk film

 1 month ago '15        #37
SSJ4 Goku  topics gone triple plat - Number 1 spot x10
Props total: 101644 101 K  Slaps total: 10094 10 K
 killacar said
Lol right, Sony just need to make a deal where they get a percentage of all the Spider-Man and Spider-Man related movies and don't have to actually do anything, like fu*k it cuz Spider-Man is great stand alone, but he shines being in the mix with other super heroes, and now ain't no way to to mix him in without Marvel

Universal just need to let go of those distribution rights or sell them off because Hulk also shines being mixed in with other Superheroes, and they can easily tell his stories now and more accurately without it necessarily being a full on solo Hulk film
Sony is throwing sh*t out there hoping it sticks, imo.

Universal? Idk what the fu*k they're doing. I agree with just let it go. We haven't haven't had soldi hulk film in a minute. I see film characters like that and dwell on the potential. I wouldn't be shocked if we were to see him in a film with the xmen & have them both f*ghting.
+1   

 1 month ago '16        #38
Pyschic  topics gone triple plat - Number 1 spot x1
Props total: 35212 35 K  Slaps total: 1746 1 K
The rights for Marvel characters are all over the place .

 1 month ago '15        #39
SSJ4 Goku  topics gone triple plat - Number 1 spot x10
Props total: 101644 101 K  Slaps total: 10094 10 K
 Pyschic said
The rights for Marvel characters are all over the place .
Anything spiderman- Sony Studios

Anything Ironman/Thor/Capt America/Xmen- Disney/marvel studios

Anything Hulk/Namor Related- Universal

 1 month ago '05        #40
jwill 
Props total: 1565 1 K  Slaps total: 287 287
 Faythung said
They do not own the rights to Spiderman in video games, only movies, or live action. If Marvel wanted to give the character to someone else to make a game then they could but they won't because Sony own the rights to him in movies and they need to cooperate.
No one is talking about video games. Don’t try to change the subject. We are talking about movies.

Edit: and I don’t even think that is correct, otherwise you would see Spider-Man on Xbox in the avengers game which you don’t.

 1 month ago '12        #41
Faythung  topics gone triple plat - Number 1 spot x1
Props total: 23317 23 K  Slaps total: 2106 2 K
 jwill said
No one is talking about video games. Don’t try to change the subject. We are talking about movies.

Edit: and I don’t even think that is correct, otherwise you would see Spider-Man on Xbox in the avengers game which you don’t.
You're in the video game section bro.

And the reason Spiderman is exclusive to Sony in video games is because that's part of the bargain. Marvel need Spiderman in film, and Sony want big AAA exclusives.


Last edited by Faythung; 09-12-2021 at 03:35 PM..

 1 month ago '05        #42
jwill 
Props total: 1565 1 K  Slaps total: 287 287
 Faythung said
You're in the video game section bro.

And the reason Spiderman is exclusive to Sony in video games is because that's part of the bargain. Marvel need Spiderman in film, and Sony want big AAA exclusives.
So what we’ve been talking about movies the entire time, now you want to bring games into it. Fine, but just to summarize this pointless argument:


Spider-Man movies are exclusive to Sony.

Spider-Man games are exclusive to Sony.

 1 month ago '12        #43
Faythung  topics gone triple plat - Number 1 spot x1
Props total: 23317 23 K  Slaps total: 2106 2 K
 jwill said
Spider-Man movie rights are owned by Sony.

Spider-Man games are exclusive to Sony.
FTFY and yes, that is correct.

New replies show every 20 seconds


Sign me up
 
 

yesterday...


most viewed right now
+25online now  30
[Health] Magic 🍄 Chocolate 🤯
47 comments
1 day ago
@misc
most viewed right now
+77online now  30
Ending Happy
151 comments
21 hours ago
@wild'ish
most viewed right now
+47online now  27
Looks like Fila is back with vengeance
69 comments
22 hours ago
@gear
most viewed right now
online now  15
MKBHD: Pixel 6/6 Pro Unboxing & First Look!
43 comments
2 days ago
@tech
back to top
register register Follow BX @ Twitter search BX privacyprivacy